List of Nobel Prizes for Theory of Evolution

[Mock Turtle]

What you will give to God?

Blame?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I like to find parallels in songs and my life. Yes, I have some unpublished results.
So, if one of them gets published in a good journal, all my town will go party.
But in this song of D.J. Bobo tells me that it is only a dream, and I must go to Heaven first, and in Heaven will be this party. The words "party just for you", means that I will be reason for this celebration.

Nothing wrong with hoping. Good luck with publishing if the conclusions follow the evidence. But not receiving a Nobel Prize is not evidence that a concept or the work of individuals or groups is falsified.

 

[The Kilted Heathen]

Please, list the names of the Nobel Prizes.
If Darwinism or Theory of Evolution got any Nobel Prize, devil seems to won this fallen world.

Please, list any Nobel Prizes or Scientific recognition awards for Creationism or the myth of Jesus.

Why no Nobel Prize for Jesus? Not a great myth.

 

[questfortruth]

Please, list any Nobel Prizes or Scientific recognition awards for Creationism

Dark Energy got Nobel Prize. So, in Universe are these three: Dark Energy, Dark Matter, matter. Therefore, if person is religious, he places God as Dark Energy, Paradise as Dark Matter, matter as matter. If person is not religious, he invents new essences, which go against of the Ockham Razor.

 

[The Kilted Heathen]

Dark Energy got Nobel Prize. So, in Universe are these three: Dark Energy, Dark Matter, matter. Therefore, if person is religious, he places God as Dark Energy, Paradise as Dark Matter, matter as matter. If person is not religious, he invents new essences, which go against of the Ockham Razor.

That's a lot of mental gymnastics to try and make a square block fit into a triangle hole.

Those are not Nobel Prizes for Creationism and Jesus myths. Must not be very good myths.

 

[PruePhillip]

Please, list the names of the Nobel Prizes.
If Darwinism or Theory of Evolution got any Nobel Prize, devil seems to won this fallen world.

So, the first Nobel recognition of Evolution is 2022 AD. Why no Nobel Prize for Darwin? The first prize is 2022 AD. And no single prize before 2022 AD. Not a great theory.

Svante Pääbo
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2022

Born: 20 April 1955, Stockholm, Sweden

Affiliation at the time of the award: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany; Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan

Prize motivation: “for his discoveries concerning the genomes of extinct hominins and human evolution”

Prize share: 1/1

Haven't you read Genesis 1 ?
God commanded the earth to bring forth life, and then He commanded the seas to bring forth life.
God didn't create life directly, He caused his creation to create life. That's what evolution does.

 

[questfortruth]

Haven't you read Genesis 1 ?
God commanded the earth to bring forth life, and then He commanded the seas to bring forth life.
God didn't create life directly, He caused his creation to create life. That's what evolution does.

Non-believer PruePhillip: "God didn't create life directly, He caused his creation to create life. That's what evolution does."
But you are non-believer, so, you wrote a nonsense. Why? You are not believing the things you wrote.

 

[HonestJoe]

So, the first Nobel recognition of Evolution is 2022 AD. Why no Nobel Prize for Darwin? The first prize is 2022 AD. And no single prize before 2022 AD. Not a great theory.

Well, Darwin himself died before the Nobel Prize was even established and they're only awarded to living recipients for recent work. The science prizes also focuses on practical research rather then theories so it shouldn't be a surprise that evolutionary theories themselves haven't been the basis for any prizes. That said, there appear to be a number of prizes under Physiology or Medicine and Chemistry over the years that relate to evolutionary theories.

 

[YoursTrue]

Sheesh.

In actuality, he did research into the theory, didn't he? I may check it out but did he prove the theory? Oh sorry, science doesn't prove a theory, does it?

 

[YoursTrue]

Non-believer PruePhillip: "God didn't create life directly, He caused his creation to create life. That's what evolution does."
But you are non-believer, so, you wrote a nonsense. Why? You are not believing the things you wrote.

If a person is going to quote the Bible, the Bible does not promote evolution, the theory of. Life did not evolve into organisms.

 

[ChristineM]

In actuality, he did research into the theory, didn't he? I may check it out but did he prove the theory? Oh sorry, science doesn't prove a theory, does it?

Another sheesh.

If he did any research into the question i would be very surprised

No he didn't prove anything, in fact he failed miserably. A simple internet search will return several names over the years.

Science does not prove anything. But it does research to ensure it doesn't made a complete fool of itself

 

[Astrophile]

In actuality, he did research into the theory, didn't he?

Who is 'he' in this sentence? Charles Darwin, Svante Pääbo, or questfortruth?

I may check it out but did he prove the theory? Oh sorry, science doesn't prove a theory, does it?

Again, who is 'he' in the first sentence, and which theory did he prove or fail to prove?

 

[YoursTrue]

Another sheesh.
If he did any research into the question i would be very surprised

No he didn't prove anything, in fact he failed miserably. A simple internet search will return several names over the years.

Science does not prove anything. But it does research to ensure it doesn't made a complete fool of itself

That's one of your posts I really like!

 

[PruePhillip]

Non-believer PruePhillip: "God didn't create life directly, He caused his creation to create life. That's what evolution does."
But you are non-believer, so, you wrote a nonsense. Why? You are not believing the things you wrote.

I believe in both God and Science. There's no problem for me.

 

[YoursTrue]

Nothing wrong with hoping. Good luck with publishing if the conclusions follow the evidence. But not receiving a Nobel Prize is not evidence that a concept or the work of individuals or groups is falsified.

You really got me on that one, Dan. Maybe some day a scientist can prove beyond doubt that the theory of evolution is true. Oh forget prove, it's not provable, right?

 

[ChristineM]

You really got me on that one, Dan. Maybe some day a scientist can prove beyond doubt that the theory of evolution is true. Oh forget prove, it's not provable, right?

It's never been falsified despite the religious naysay doing their best

 

[Mock Turtle]

That's one of your posts I really like!

So you perhaps do agree that religious beliefs so often makes fools of the believers? Like perhaps the Taliban currently, and those who seem to dismiss scientific evidence, and often as to a low appreciation and/or knowledge of the particular issue.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Non-believer PruePhillip: "God didn't create life directly, He caused his creation to create life. That's what evolution does."
But you are non-believer, so, you wrote a nonsense. Why? You are not believing the things you wrote.

That is quite the arrogant accusation.
And also quite a dodge of the actual, very valid, point made.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

In actuality, he did research into the theory, didn't he? I may check it out but did he prove the theory? Oh sorry, science doesn't prove a theory, does it?

Is this supposed to be an attack on science? An attempt at brushing it off as "not very relevant" or important or similar, because theories are never considered "proven"?

It must be. Why else would you ask a question to which you already know the answer and acknowledge exactly that in the next breath?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

If a person is going to quote the Bible, the Bible does not promote evolution, the theory of. Life did not evolve into organisms.

"into organisms"?

What a weird thing to say.