Heyo
Veteran Member
You can say "****", "****" and "***" in most German media without it being censored.Yeah, they have state-sanctioned censorship of media in many European nations, too. Germany is bonkers with the censorship.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You can say "****", "****" and "***" in most German media without it being censored.Yeah, they have state-sanctioned censorship of media in many European nations, too. Germany is bonkers with the censorship.
I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you.You can say "****", "****" and "***" in most German media without it being censored.
You can say "****", "****" and "***" in most German media without it being censored.
Hmm, a libertarian giving the Sermon on the Mount...
I use the regulatory environment as a litmus test as to weither one is actually and truly free or not or just one thinks they are.It seems like in former years liberals valued freedom and liberty more than at present. When I was younger the more liberal-minded people were considered anti- establishment. I’m starting to notice that now a dramatic change; it’s those on the left that are very establishment leaning and appear to be all to ready to give up liberty.
What are your thoughts?
Ron Paul Liberty Report
And why is the exposure indecent in the first place and require punishment by the law? Why is that not authoritarian? What principle did you use to judge indecent exposure laws as liberal and those against spitting on sidewalks to be authoritarian?
Then they demand your papers....So RF is more authoritarian than Germany because I only see stars.
your argument is flawed, because I never said I was for any particular law.
Would a libertarian urge his followers to obey the Scribes and Pharisees (Matthew 23)?
It is less about how much is censored, but what is censored. I guess I could say some things on RF that would bring me in hot water in Germany.So RF is more authoritarian than Germany because I only see stars.
You seem to tolerate and even support laws against indecent exposure. Are you in favor of such laws? Is such law authoritarian and what's your reasonning?
My point is that it is no more or less authoritarian than a law against urinating in public, which many countries have, including, I suspect, yours.
Perhaps the church needs to look at itself and ask, "Why are we losing the young people?"Yes, that is true about young people there. It is unfortunate, IMHO.
My support for any proposed law depends - rather obviously - on the subject matter of the law in question.That is correct. So do you support more laws like this or less? Do you want to add authoritarianism or decrease it?
My support for any proposed law depends - rather obviously - on the subject matter of the law in question.
You seem to be trying to argue that passing any new law is "authoritarian", which is ridiculous. There was a post earlier today, which you refused to read, which explains why that is a wrong use of that label.
There's a big difference between pulling your genetals out and defecating on the sidewalk, and spitting. Most people don't want to swallow their flem, and there is no smell.
...But yes, if I can't hold it, I will defecate behind a bush.
Most people will probably overlook the guy ducking behind the bush(provided its not on someone's front lawn or something), even though its technically against the law. Nature calls, and keeps calling back until you answer. That being said, if you found you really needed to spit, you could probably duck behind a bush and do the same thing with little consequence...
Perhaps the church needs to look at itself and ask, "Why are we losing the young people?"