John D. Brey
Well-Known Member
I would support the change to using the majority vote to decide national elections.....Whatever system we use to select our President, the opposing parties should have the right to challenge the vote count if necessary. If Trump wins, Trump should be respected as our President....If someone else wins, they should be respected as the President..Sometime, it is necessary to state the obvious...
We have a national problem when one of our political party's power and influence is entrenched too deeply into the machinery of state, or when the machinery of state has a political bias that they're willing to enforce using the machinery of state.
We have another problem when the voters of one of the parties are ok with the machinery of state trying to tilt the election in the direction they, and the voters of one party, want the election to go.
We have a further problem when the media outlets of the nation link up with the machinery of state, and the voters of one party, to knowingly tilt the vocabulary, and focus, of the news media, to back up the machinery of state, and the party of preference, in order win elections the old fashion way that has always been the problem with democracy.
Democracy in the USA has run it's course. Something else is on the wings. Amen.
Republicans can pivot easily and naturally. Not so democrats whose only power comes from the nature and machinery of democracy. While for republicans the collapse of democracy will likely be a good thing (in the long run), for democrats it's fatal. Which is why the stakes are so high for the democrats that their biases have become absolute blinders to anything but whatever will keep their cornucopia of redistribution of power, wealth, and self-esteem ---i.e., democracy --- intact.
It's one thing to chain and beat the goose that lays the golden egg. It's quite another to gang rape it and threaten to slay it when the other party refuses to abort the offspring of the crime so that a family resemblance can convict the perp (the 2020 election in a nutshell). The FBI went into the sanctity of a man's temple to attempt to locate and abort the evidence of one of the most damning crimes in the history of the USA. They then have the audacity to attempt to accuse him (and anyone who agrees with him) of the crime of calling their abortion of justice a crime. Worse, democrats applaud such abortions of justice and literally make the crime of abortion their rallying cry.
John
Last edited: