Albel
New Member
Reading Devi Bhagavatam (transl. Ramesh Menon).
This includes a passage quoting Narayana saying that Ganga and Sri (Padma River) shall only flow for 5000 years of the Kali Yuga, and then return to Vaikutha, and all the sacred tirthas (crossing places or fords) shall return with them; with the exception of Kasi (Varanasi) and Vrindavana which shall remain even in the deepest night of the Kali.
According to Wikipedia, the Kali Yuga commenced Kali Yuga - Wikipedia in 3102 BCE, so 5000 years after would be 1899 CE.
How is the fact we still have these rivers (and the other holy sites) understood?
Did subsequent texts indicate a new interpretation?
I note there was also a near grand-conjuction in December of that year too - how would that have been interpreted in light of the 5000-year milestone
Were the various Indian Famines between 1886-1900 believed to be an outplaying of Kali Yuga in its 5000th year?
This includes a passage quoting Narayana saying that Ganga and Sri (Padma River) shall only flow for 5000 years of the Kali Yuga, and then return to Vaikutha, and all the sacred tirthas (crossing places or fords) shall return with them; with the exception of Kasi (Varanasi) and Vrindavana which shall remain even in the deepest night of the Kali.
According to Wikipedia, the Kali Yuga commenced Kali Yuga - Wikipedia in 3102 BCE, so 5000 years after would be 1899 CE.
How is the fact we still have these rivers (and the other holy sites) understood?
Did subsequent texts indicate a new interpretation?
I note there was also a near grand-conjuction in December of that year too - how would that have been interpreted in light of the 5000-year milestone
Were the various Indian Famines between 1886-1900 believed to be an outplaying of Kali Yuga in its 5000th year?