• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg falls and fractured three ribs

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
On the other hand, given what the opposition DID to Kavenaugh, do you thing Justice Ginsberg would want to expose anybody she LIKES to that?

The opposition lost-- and a known rapist was put into SCOTUS anyway.

Considering that was the ... ahem... "best" the GOP had to offer? I doubt Ginsberg trusts the orange NAZI any more than most of America does: which is, not at all.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
She was planning on retiring, until the orange liar stole the elections. So, yeah, she's having to serve longer than she wanted, in an effort to save the Republic from Nazis.

Hey.

Are YOU one of the guys who posted the home address of Tucker Carlson on the internet, along with the address of his best friend and his brother, and who shouted (his wife was home but he wasn't) "WE KNOW WHERE YOU SLEEP"????

That group claims to be anti fascist, too.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
The opposition lost-- and a known rapist was put into SCOTUS anyway.

Sorry, but that's simply untrue.

And you know that.

..............................................and I would be saying that if Kavenaugh had been a known socialist being proposed by Obama. That whole thing was an embarrassment...and not to Kavenaugh

Considering that was the ... ahem... "best" the GOP had to offer? I doubt Ginsberg trusts the orange NAZI any more than most of America does: which is, not at all.

What IS it with you people? Someone has the unutterable gall to disagree with the politically correct in ANY way.....and they are suddenly Nazis?

This is getting more than scary.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What IS it with you people? Someone has the unutterable gall to disagree with the politically correct in ANY way.....and they are suddenly Nazis?
Welcome to RF!
maxresdefault.jpg


Also....
a-lietle-golden-book-d-25-everyone-i-dont-like-is-27601027.png
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Hey.

Are YOU one of the guys who posted the home address of Tucker Carlson on the internet, along with the address of his best friend and his brother, and who shouted (his wife was home but he wasn't) "WE KNOW WHERE YOU SLEEP"????

That group claims to be anti fascist, too.

no. I do not dox. In direct contrast to every trumpie I've ever met...
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Sorry, but that's simply untrue.

And you know that.

No-- what I know is that multiple numbers of very credible witnesses testified that K is a serial rapist of women, especially when they are drunk.

THAT is what I know. So anyone who supports the GOP? Is now supportive of a group who thinks nothing of rape...
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
What IS it with you people? Someone has the unutterable gall to disagree with the politically correct in ANY way.....and they are suddenly Nazis?

This is getting more than scary.

No-- tЯump is a known NAZI. He admitted it in public, when he called NAZI's "some very fine people".

His father was a card-carrying KKK member-- also NAZI sympathizers.

There is no suddenly here-- this is tЯump's behavior all along.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
It was YOUR false accusation. You figure it out.

(shrug)

Well, I'm old and not cognizant of the more contemporary slang, political or gang related.

..............on the other hand, I like to read Beowulf in the original old English because the jokes are better.

I guess everybody has his or her own set of skills and linguistic abilities.

I had no idea whatsoever what 'dox' means. Following your (not very) courteous suggestion, I looked it up. So...you do not 'dox.'

..............does that mean you'd have no problems standing outside the home of a political commentator, scaring his wife by shouting 'we know where you live?"

Ah, well. Your standards of courtesy do seem consistent.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
..............does that mean you'd have no problems standing outside the home of a political commentator, scaring his wife by shouting 'we know where you live?"

No... that would be acting like a trump supporters act. Exactly like, in fact-- I can even point to examples where trumpists did exactly that-- on National Radio and worse....

heck: trump himself said such things direct from his "bully pulpit".

Ah, well. Your standards of courtesy do seem consistent.

Dude! You started off ranting AT ME-- your very first comment to me was one of the least polite I've seen in these forums. From post 1, you've been nothing but rude, and assumed horrible things that I supposedly might do.

Geeze. ...and you have the unmitigated GALL to complain of "courtesy"?

You reap what you sow, buddy. You reap what you sow.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
No... that would be acting like a trump supporters act. Exactly like, in fact-- I can even point to examples where trumpists did exactly that-- on National Radio and worse....

heck: trump himself said such things direct from his "bully pulpit".

Really? I'd like to see the references and quotes regarding that...you know, mobs standing outside the homes of liberals and Democrats shouting at defenseless women that 'WE KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE" amid demands that the family move out of town....G'head.




Dude! You started off ranting AT ME-- your very first comment to me was one of the least polite I've seen in these forums. From post 1, you've been nothing but rude, and assumed horrible things that I supposedly might do.

Geeze. ...and you have the unmitigated GALL to complain of "courtesy"?

You reap what you sow, buddy. You reap what you sow.

Do please learn the difference between an accusation and a question.

And I am not a 'dude.' I find that your assumption that "dianaiad" (you DID pay attention to the name, yes?) must be male COULD be considered, by the politically correct, sexism. Were you assuming my gender because, since you were impressed by my erudition and writing that you didn't think a woman could have written as I have, or don't you think a woman would have been, as you seem to think, a 'ranter' and discourteous? Either way, the far left feminists would have your hide. ;)

(thinking)

Or perhaps not. My own personal experience is that the far left feminists only protect those who agree with them. They are as nasty to conservative women as they are to men in general.

Ah, well.

I'm old, and cranky, and some might call me curmudgeonly.I do think sometimes that Trump would serve his nation best in silence. I'm a libertarian and I'm not really fond of EITHER side, but I do lean right fiscally and am somewhere in the middle socially. Right now, though, the preponderance of nastiness is coming from the left.

Just so you know, I am not, and have never been, a 'dude.' Having given birth to five children, trust me on this, I know this about myself.
 
Last edited:

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Really? I'd like to see the references and quotes regarding that...you know, mobs standing outside the homes of liberals and Democrats shouting at defenseless women that 'WE KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE" amid demands that the family move out of town....G'head..

The tЯump has literally called for this very thing from his bully pulpit.

And the "example" you cleverly listed? Has no actual references to actual real-world events, so it's pretty safe to assume it's pure horse exhaust.




Do please learn the difference between an accusation and a question..

The tone of your... ahem... "question" left no doubt as to your thoughts. Your language easily placed your attitude as one of hating liberals, but giving a "wink-wink-nudge-nudge" to CONservitives. As I said: extremely rude, from your first post. This post? Just as rude.

It's what I have come to expect from CONservitives, however, so you are nothing new...
And I am not a 'dude.' I find that your assumption that "dianaiad" (you DID pay attention to the name, yes?).

No. They [forum handles] are just random letters in a row, and unpronounceable anyway. Doesn't much matter, as black-and-white printing is gender less anyway. The majority of folk on forums are male, and in English, if it's unknown, the default is "male".

But. In "hippy parlance", "Dude" is also gender neutral; always has been really.

But I see you are one of those who likes to be "persecuted" because you are female? Is that fair? Let's see...

.... must be male COULD be considered, by the politically correct, sexism. .

There you go! Are you happy, now, that you have invented "persecution" where there was none?

Here's a cupcake.
Were you assuming my gender because, since you were impressed by my erudition and writing that you didn't think a woman could have written as I have, or don't you think a woman would have been, as you seem to think, a 'ranter' and discourteous? Either way, the far left feminists would have your hide. ;).

No-- in truth? I did not care one way or another, and I still don't. And no-- so far? "Impressed" is not an adjective I would apply to you in any way. Wordy? sure. Has a persecution complex? Absolutely. Rude? 100%. Quick to ASSume false attitudes about others? 100% again. Loves to build Straw Men, then brag about knocking them down? I'd say high probability.

Impressed with your own words? Well... probably, although I cannot see the justification myself.
(thinking).

<citation needed>

Or perhaps not. My own personal experience is that the far left feminists only protect those who agree with them. They are as nasty to conservative women as they are to men in general..

I don't even know that that is-- and I doubt you do either....
Ah, well.

I'm old, and cranky, and some might call me curmudgeonly.I do think sometimes that Trump would serve his nation best in silence..

He would serve us even better, in jail where criminals like him belong. He IS a criminal, but obviously, that's not something you find ... bothersome.
I'm a libertarian and I'm not really fond of EITHER side, but I do lean right fiscally and am somewhere in the middle socially. Right now, though, the preponderance of nastiness is coming from the left..

Libertarian? Oh! No WONDER you like trump: Libertarian is Rule By The Biggest Bully, and you cannot get much more bullying than with tЯump.

LMAO! That explains so ... much! You live in the land of Delusions (libertarian)

Just so you know, I am not, and have never been, a 'dude.' Having given birth to five children, trust me on this, I know this about myself.

Just so you know, "dude" is a generic term, and can be genderless, which is how I intended it.

Since forums are sexless? (has to be-- written medium) I tend to ignore gender.

Be that as it may, but dude or not? Rude you are. Still.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
The tЯump has literally called for this very thing from his bully pulpit.

And the "example" you cleverly listed? Has no actual references to actual real-world events, so it's pretty safe to assume it's pure horse exhaust.

From the person who has just refused to give me the references for any example (including the quotes from Trump from the 'bully pulpit') ????

Yeah, right. Double standards are not going to make me want to play, Bob the unbeliever.

.....
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
In the news....
RBG scare: David Axelrod warns Supreme Court vacancy fight could 'tear this country apart'
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.c...1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=618&h=410&crop=1
Excerpted....
A former Obama adviser set the stage for a potentially nasty confirmation fight in the Senate next year within an hour of the Supreme Court announcing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently completed three weeks of radiation treatment after doctors found a localized cancerous tumor on her pancreas.

"If there is a SCOTUS vacancy next year and @senatemajldr carries through on his extraordinary promise to fill it-despite his own previous precedent in blocking Garland-it will tear this country apart," David Axelrod said in a tweet Friday afternoon.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
From the person who has just refused to give me the references for any example (including the quotes from Trump from the 'bully pulpit') ????

Yeah, right. Double standards are not going to make me want to play, Bob the unbeliever.

.....

And your rudeness continues unabated. Dude.
 
Top