• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Just another shocking Conspiracy by Religion

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
th


Most people are unable to pinpoint the meaning of Christian establishment in the world. The English background makes people from a naturally Anglican background. The Anglican compromise already put Government over solid control over the apparatus of established Religion. Anglicanism/via media/secularism these are a lot of ways to say that.

The separable and promotable institutions of Christianity are hard to pinpoint. We read from the very first Anglican wedding vows how Christ attended a marriage in Canaan? Jesus Ordered Christians not to divorce their wives. Their hearts were hard when Moses Allowed divorce and Jesus did not Allow divorce, and that word is given to whom its not given to act as eunuchs , for the Kingdom of God, in Matthew.

The Christian institution does not exist as the Roman or Hellenistic Gods did in an all-absorbing all-comers equal knowledge environment , or at least not to the same historical extent. The 10 commandments that preserved the land of Israel state, in there, no God shall be worshipped before God.

This is before the undisputed work of Jesus Christ to redeem as an advocate toward , without colorful language, the vengeful Creator whom all humanity has original sin of the fall of Adam and Eve, and to inherit as would be understood, the rights as like a family, to the Kingdom of Heaven which is God's alone.

Mostly the work of the Apostles as recorded in the Bible are undisputed , Mostly. The twelve Apostles in the book of Acts spread Christianity to the entire world. Paul's missions show a route from Jerusalem through Anatolia, to Athens.
This video is from Acts 17 . There is relevance today on how the Greek Orthodox Church would be organized. People again, will have very little connection to Eastern Europe, which is fairly easy to point out , not with the Communist era, but by the Orthodox Church. The writing systems, the beliefs, these are not direct Roman descendants.
Looking back on history, the idea that Zeus became the Greek language for God as "Theus". The Parthenon of the pagan Athena would develop into a temple to the Virgin Mary. The video expresses a much deeper concept, that the original Apostles, accepted that God had acted in Athens Before their arrival. After all, the saving Grace and the Soul of each individual being only one Aspect of God. Late in the video, an Unknown God whom had saved sheep from plague before Paul's arrival is the God that he wishes to proclaim as the God of the Bible. These Were the Acts of God already in the land of Greece by natural discovery. Church planting is mentioned as they wanted to have planted Christianity in this culture.

We may briefly review how it is that we can Stand for their to be Denominations of a religion. How can people Stand it?! How can their be but only One belief in Jesus Christ?! How did a Denomination ever come about?! Do we not have a populace that yearns for the undivided group of followers? How is it that a Pope can claim this effort?

Admittedly from a Biblical, Orthodox, and Presbyterian favoring perspective, we may briefly review the Great Schism from 800 ad to 1200 ad. The Pope, was a position, that used to meet as equals with the others in the Pentarchy. Pentarchy - Wikipedia
The Pope claims to hold office from Saint Peter who was granted "keys to the Kingdom". Most Presbyterians and Orthodox instead favor "Saint Andrew" the "First-called", brother of Saint Peter. Saint Andrew is generally given to have preached in the East. The Pope in order to have Thrown Off and disclaimed the other half of the Church, had to have named himself the Only Church, then he placed himself not in an equal meeting with the others. In 800 ad, Germany, neither Roman, nor Holy, was proclaimed the Holy Roman Empire, a title grantable by the Pope, since this did upset and unthrone the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine Empire believed itself Eastern Rome, the Greek Roman Empire, and generally the Churches of Orthodoxy were among, around or missioned by the Byzantine Empire. They had created up until then, standards that still define accepted Christianity, in the 400s, the Nicene Creed, the Chalcedonian Creed.

These produced the common phrases many will see such as the Trinity, or Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. These decided that Jesus Christ was fully Human and Divinity. This wasn't like Hercules, a simple half-man Half-God whom Zeus had in a love affair.

These decisions did produce relevant schisms still today. The Ethiopians used to be aligned with the Coptics of Egypt, these all very historical people, whom disregarded the rulings of the 400's in Egypt and Ethiopia. The Scots Confession of 1560 also notes the heresies of Nestorius, Arius, and others whom disregard those rulings. Arius found favor among the disorganized Visigothic tribes during the fall of Rome.


So this video has several nice features. It offers a fairly abstract idea about, how the Orthodox could repair the one Catholic or Universal Church of all Christians. They suggest the recapture of Rome, Antioch, Jerusalem, would allow promotion of the Pentarchy, which simply puts the Bishop of Rome back among equals and in equal council and anyone who must meet is no longer infallible, we can assume.

Late in the video shows off the basic concept of Autocephaly. Besides the Pentarchy, the mended Great Schism has produced autocephaly in the non-standard area of that Pentarchy set out by the Byzantines, such as, the autocephalic Kingdoms of Poland, and Hungary, whose Bishop would meet representing that would meet or "synod" representing that area and its religious history.

Presbyterian is a Greek Word. In the 1500's the Byzantine Empire would have been conquered by the Ottomans. The Greek Scholars by necessity flee with the actual history, education, and concepts of the Byzantines, the obscure name for that was humanist renaissance, not humanism. The name tries to describe having multiple educational histories and innovating, opening the student's minds and learning by the debates of Socrates over rote memorization learning.
 

Attachments

  • thJNMPXEMY.jpg
    thJNMPXEMY.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 0

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
John Calvin as a school of thought in Europe had made a thoughtful sermon on every chapter of the Bible, purposefully for sermonizing, on every single chapter of the Bible. This represents Knowledge spreading to all the people. not all of John Calvin's works were Ever translated from French to English. Every realm of society was meant to have the knowledge of their station to Biblical principle and rejoicing in knowledge.

The history of corrupt indulgence produced a maligned theory focusing , in Many verses and Chapters, on the Offspring of God, how God predetermined to Know whom was saved, which is no magic bullet, its no magic shot in the arm, it supposes that through obedience over the debased and sinful nature, God is leading the way through a fate of his Choosing, whom all Should be pre-ordained, I've never heard one confirmation to this extremely Hopeful ideology, of exclusion to populations, nations, or entire races. Much maligned due to the theology, or philosophical context, fueling very few Religious denominations today.

What is our Place as Americans in this Christian World? Is it disguised? People with enough experience in Europe know how awfully different it is. The established religion of these places stands for their history, their people, a standing of its Church in relation to other peoples and inseparable. Other experiences and histories, could be a challenge to the people of Europe in every country the missionary visits, those are 1000 year old Churches.

Most of Christian identity has been forged by warfare with the Pagan and the Muslim. The Templar, Hospitaller, and Teutonic Knights were military orders that attacked the Muslim held lands on the Mediterranean coast. The Byzantine Emperor had written the Pope for help, in the end effect that the Pope's military outlook had landed in Jerusalem. This was in fact largely at odds with the Byzantine Empire on many points. The dirty crusaders seemed Barbarian in the old Roman usage of the word, as the passed through the necessary gate of Constantinople. King Richard the Lionheart extended the Crusades into the 1200s as a notable English historical example, his reportedly abusive steward during his absence, King John, and the fables of Robinhood who robbed the rich for the poor. The 4th Crusade would finally Betray the Byzantine Empire disastrously. Many Orthodox inside Turkey still today have equal blame for the West on many accounts with their circumstances, regardless of the topic. The effect of Venice's crusade was to attack Constantinople and set up a Latin Empire, which of course the Greeks were not Latin, in alphabet or anything else.

Relevantly with Protestant Reformation then, was Russia's claim to become the Third Rome, having been taught that Constantinople was the 2nd Rome, Moscow claimed to be the 3rd Rome on the fall of Constantinople. This has effects today in religion. The Patriarch of Moscow, setup as an equal with the Ecumenical Patriarch Batholomew, rarely appears to meet with the Orthodox Communion.

The history of Presbyterianism in focus, includes several nuances, not that at odds or different or alien from the common British experience. Scots were enrolled throughout the British Empire for patriotic expression in equality with English thought, with known and open philosophers, and sources. The Pope had proclaimed that the line of Protestant Anne Boleyn and King Henry, whom having convinced King Henry also to separate and form a Church of England, to not divorce, to have proclaimed his marriage in consanginuity or closeness of relation, had not been the formation of a marriage with the Queen Catherine, which the Pope had not allowed. That would make a Protestant claim to Anne Boleyne as the first wife of King Henry. By either semi-salic or salic primogeniture, their first-born daughter Queen Elizabeth is by law the heir of England, France, and Ireland.

Queen Elizabeth I was raised Protestant and represented Protestant ascendancy. Her inauguration was the reading of Scripture, rose pedals, and poetry from children, rejection of the old image of the Virgin Mary is notable for the Virgin Queen.

The Pope has infallibly declared, in his line of religion, that the Queen Elizabeth I is excommunicate from Catholic Faith in the Papal bull named Regnan in Excelsis, or Ruling on High. "God Save the Queen" is commonly declared a British Anthem, possibly by a pianist in her personal employ. She was excommunicated in that time by the pope for "the Rule of Calvin".

Did Elizabeth ever profess herself a Calvinist? I don't think her nature accurately demands this question. John Knox was the closest contact of instituting religion, whose "First Blast of the Trumpet" carried by accident an unfortunate indictment on the rule of women, which politically allows no need for this endorsement. The Acts of Uniformity and the Act of Supremacy serve to mean that the Queen of England for the Church of England selects the leadership of the Church of England, in unity of that realm, in avoidance of the religious strife inflicting all the rest of Europe, inducing the peasantry to directly confront the Papal bull declaring heresy to any following her orders, with an equal position, that one is no longer Catholic, just by the obeyance to the order of the Queen, would make an Anglican. Several 100 martyrs of Catholic Faith are known to have refused a single attendance of Anglican service on pain of death.

She has been an inspiration to Calvinism as well as Protestant Reformation regardless it seems, especially due to the direct military conflict of any later ruler, even protestant ones. Her government's forces,n ot necessarily under her supervision, led reinforcing aid to the Church in the Netherlands , notably the Spanish Armada, to France, notably aid to the Huguenots, and in Scotland, notably John Knox's arrest of Queen mary of Scotland and the declaration of the Church over the Royalty within its Kingdom.

Scotland's own King James would be a detriment to religion in its Kingdom then. He demanded a book of Common Prayer, the King James Bible was falsely promoted toward a single Church in Britain. The Episcopacy of Bishops was demanded.

Issues would lead to war during the Bishops' War where finally, the Presbyterian Church of Scotland was outlawed. A "Covenanticle" was an illegal meeting of the Presbyterian Church in Scotland. The Covenanter Army was when again, the Church has assumed supremacy over the political Government of the Kingdom. This religious force signed a Solemn League and Covenant. The Covenant demanded the return of Reformed Religion in Scotland, England, and Ireland. The Scottish were eventually victorious in the Bishops' War, which however, would prelude Civil War throughout the Three Kingdoms.

Reformed Religion had also seen development during Elizabeth's reign in England, again, under a different name the Puritans. The Puritans sought full Reform of the Church of England, which may have even backslided since Elizabeth had removed statues in the Churches in favor of the royal arms of England. They counted any and all practices not in the Bible as superstitious, a list that could include candles to Christmas.

In fact in 1648, the Puritan Parliament at odds with King Charles who had assumed a Catholic government over England. The Scottish Bishops war would be seen as a prelude to the Covenanters invasion in the North of England attacking King Charles' Royalists. Oliver Cromwell would appear as the leader of the Puritan Parliaments' forces roughly confederate with the Covenanter Army.

However, Oliver Cromwell's forces would become rather self-appointed as time moved toward an insular outlook that defeat both the Scots and Dutch, though worse by far is Catholic persecution in Ireland.

Common law today disallowed Catholic rulers of the very ceremonial Monarchy. The Presbyterians had been summoned by the Puritan Parliament and together had signed to Westminster London the Puritans' new Westminster Confession.


With this history, the Religious history of the United States becomes much clearer. The celebrated Puritan Pilgrims, seem a distant icon, and their religion has become truly unattainable. It seems to suggest that to have placed Religion above the State in leaving England, to be a Pilgrim leaving for American colonies, is unattainable. It seems that the Mayflower , the Mayflower Compact, John Winthrop, and Reagan's "City Upon a Hill" are hardly relevant. Had Andrew Jackson seen a Christian Character of Civilization in the Indians then a direction of development that could include them rather than form the Trail of Tears ran in large detail.

So we see how when George Washington declared independence we have several reasons to proclaim a switch back to Presbyterianism rather than Anglicanism. The Anglican Clergy had in fact sailed across the sea in fright! The King and Queen were such heads of Religion in that practice to make "Little Bo Peep" a political statement. The Puritan outlook was overwhelming in some colonies around Boston to have illegalized Christmas. There were existant Puritan "alcoves" into the 1700's , though, noted, they had assimilated at the time of the Revolution, its widely believed.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
George Washington remarked of the Hessians that "Germans have much to do about Christmas" and the implication is much deeper. This foreign German force employed by the British on the native land of Americans, were thoroughly routed as almost 1000 of these men surrendered on Christmas Morning, to a newly invigorated American resistance. The Continental Army had been suffering a harsh previous winter. They went on to the Battle of Princeton and Trenton and on to a "somewhat" final victory. Princeton, by the way, released from British hands, has a commissioned Portrait of Washington along with exchanged pleasantry. Princeton is the theological heart of American Presbyterianism already at this time. Their ancient mottos would be "Under God's Power She Flourishes" which is a very good description toward the 1789 widely international distributive anthem of Washington's Government, "Hail Columbia". Princeton also has "old Nassau" since during the Glorious Revolution, William of Orange Nassau, or, the Netherlands, had relieved Britain finally after the long English Civil Wars of any Catholic Government.


George Washington would be the First to make the date of today's Thanksgiving proclamation. George Washington credited the Ruler of the Nations and thanks to this Great God for the last Thursday of November.

A truly small occurrence in terms of national Thought processes, the US Civil War happened at very great misunderstood cost of human life. The arguments of antiquated defeated government should be far and away, from here, as if to reclaim, all compensation and all rights and claims granted to one side of a war even, which is absurd, or to reclaim anything from that era. Much worse than that, much worse, is Innovations of Punishment. That is Different. That is so totally a Different discussion as to continue a bit on the Civil War.

Robert Lewis Dabney was a source on the illegalized Southern Presbyterianism. So he may be an interesting starting point particularly on how I'm leaving the Civil War discussion. Said to be of an English Puritan strain, he was the Chief of Staff of the First Brigade, the army of Stonewall Jackson. Stonewall Jackson is named "Blue Light" referencing a Scottish strain. There is a high level discussion to start with.

In 1860, in Jefferson Davis, drawing on the occurrences of a Catholic King Charles' attempt to dissolve a Puritan Parliament, Jefferson Davis shook the mighty stick that represents a God that represents the history of a People. The God of the Fathers of a Nation had guided by great Providence through numerous enemies and dangers and that Almighty God in the Sovereign Character of the States went with him out of the Senate and National fame to the localized seat of Power of inauguration in Montgomery Alabama. In this very capitol building went up a Religious Constitution , that being having all of the Constitution plus Religion, in the Year of our Lord, 1861. In the Montgomery Capitol building occurred the writing of that Confederate Constitution that Established Presbyterian-led government, and also wrote the Bonnie Blue Flag, shown on the first flag of Alabama.

I may say the media unfair, obviously, but humanity may demand notice to to other peoples, the living, for instance. Nowhere can we truly find this singular goal of EITHER Slavery or States RIghts. The inauguration of Jefferson Davis was the true return of governance faithfully executed. It was guided by great Providence. The Provisional government was humbly established. a Quick search will discover 0 instances of 'slave' or discussion. In higher level of government, in internal communications, slavery was seen as a singular source of frictions. The cause of the Confederacy as should be expected and expectable, is a delightful blend of the honorable, the gallant, the high-minded, and etc.

So what can we singularly make of our unique American experience today having had 5 of a Christian population shouting Christian over 1 fifth of that other screaming Christian population? What is the right situation today? Why would it be arrived at with any flippancy?

The international world remarks with our unique amazing qualities. The war amendments , the 13th and 14th, disallow return of the Confederates ( not a Union government at that point). They create birthright citizenship. We have the unique viewpoint that immigrants born here are Americans because that isn't the viewpoint of the rest of the World. Napoleon had been in the very front of minds in 1866 whos activities from 1800 to 1820 were remarkable throughout Europe, in toppling the old Order, in "Equality , Fraternity". The Statue of Liberty would be presented to America by the French Antislavery society.




Eisenhower: Peace and Presbyterianism





https://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/theologyandworship/pdfs/belhar.pdf


 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Admittedly from a Biblical, Orthodox, and Presbyterian favoring perspective, we may briefly review the Great Schism from 800 ad to 1200 ad. The Pope, was a position, that used to meet as equals with the others in the Pentarchy. Pentarchy - Wikipedia
The Pope claims to hold office from Saint Peter who was granted "keys to the Kingdom". Most Presbyterians and Orthodox instead favor "Saint Andrew" the "First-called", brother of Saint Peter. Saint Andrew is generally given to have preached in the East. The Pope in order to have Thrown Off and disclaimed the other half of the Church, had to have named himself the Only Church, then he placed himself not in an equal meeting with the others.
I don't have much time, but thanks for posting your beliefs on this.

As far as the above is concerned, it's simply wrong in some parts. The "Bishop of Rome" was recognized in the 2nd Century church as being the one's bishops would go to if there were controversies and disputes that needed to be settled, and that clearly shows up in Ignatius' (of Antioch) letter to Clement (of Rome) saying that the Bishop of Rome had a certain priority because it is where Peter and Paul were executed. Even though the title "Pope" wasn't used until centuries later, only that bishop had the designation of such leadership.

And it is Peter ("Kephas" in Koine Greek, who was changed by Jesus to that name, obviously for a reason), whom is designated by Jesus as being "Rock", which is what "Kephas" translates out to in Koine Greek. At the beginning of that verse, Jesus makes it clear that he's referring to Kephas with "Thou art Peter [Kephas}, and upon that rock... ". And there is a play on words (i.e. "Petros" and "petra") that's involved since Greek is gender sensitive.

It was understood back then that the true church was the Church of Jesus and the Apostles, and all other groups were deemed heretical. In the first two centuries, different names for the Church existed over that span of time, starting with "the Way", then "Christian", and then "Orthodox" (truth) and "Catholic" (universal), but when we get into the 3rd century "Catholic" begins to be most commonly used as its formal name. "Orthodox" wasn't used as a formal name until the Great Schism many centuries later.

The "mark" of the early Church was whether one's bishops (episcopo) could trace their appointments back to the apostles, and it was this [Catholic] Church that eventually decided upon the canon used by the vast majority of Christians worldwide today.

Even Wikipedia covers this quite adequately, btw.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Just Another Shocking Conspiracy By Religion
Confederate Veterans were a swarm of political focus at the turn of 20th Century. Especially, in every resurgent Democratic Southern state. The United States should be proud not to harass human beings, to care for the sick, and similar causes. At the height of Confederate Memorials and acceptance, Woodrow Wilson ran for President and won, twice. His Southern Presbyterianism would be in every facet almost a blueprint of inalienable outlook.

His viewpoint would gain nationwide acceptance by a number of factors. The New York region and the new Factory boss Republican ascendancy were causing labor abuses, particularly among poor immigrant, Eastern European immigrant women. Common phrases of this time included Tammany Hall - Wikipedia and William M. Tweed - Wikipedia. The Democratic establishment, having only readmitted the last Southern States into the Union and out of Military Occupation, at the start of the 1880's, was also dominated by these anti-Union sweatshop kingpens and mobsters. This prelude may explain the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire - Wikipedia. In this famous incident distributed by newspaper, 120 women and 20 men burned alive in a building that the Bosses had locked from the outside to prevent any breaks, stealing or labor shortage.

The surprising Democratic victory of Woodrow Wilson as a returned wing of the Democrat Southern party, represents the fall of Tammany Hall, the Boss Tweed character, the greatness of life in the face of our new industrial machine. Communism was yet an Unknown quantity at this point in the entire world, in the Innovation of our language on these topics. Rocking Chairs and lemonade.

Alma Gluck would officially be a partner of the presidency, having immigrated and converted to Christianity, and having enjoyed a recording hit of religious tunes and Southern Favorites, including "Carry me Back to Ol' Virginny".

Many issues were Thrust on President Woodrow Wilson, which is unfortunately how we associate this president later. Woodrow Wilson refused joining World War 1. His conservative homelife had women's suffrage forced upon him. The winds of change introduced a new political anthem as the Star Spangled Banner. Though, the League of Nations was extremely his entire architectural achievement. With a central meeting ,all the Nations of the world after world war 1, would meet once a year, to settle issues of international peace with no central federalized army, that is, until basically the start of world war 1, or the Japanese condemned invasion of Manchuria where Japan was removed from the League of Nations.

Why would Southern Presbyterianism be outlawed today?
When President Eisenhower's D-Day radio and address called for the Crusade of Free men, it was a start of the disintegration of Nazi Germany. In everyone's minds, was the discovered prisoners, the previously unknown state of the minority populations under the Nazis. Often forgotten on top of 10s of millions of outright planned Deaths, was a status of Forced Labor. Eisenhower declared a new religious leadership of America against the total Evil of Slavery to be defeated by Total Good.

This era produced "In God We Trust" as a national motto. It made the pledge of allegiance a particular religious quality with "Under God", which has gone through many interpretations in the Courts. Most remarkable is how it leads in his second term to a cooperative rebranding of the Presbyterian Church. The start of the 60's saw the once 8 million strong USA Presbyterians, and around the world were many Presbyterians, merged into other Churches without any independent Character.

As we can see with the link, is a nearly Obvious conspiracy in international politics regarding Korean Presbyterianism.

If we bring together all the major over 1 million centers of Presbyterianism as a side-effect of British Empire, or American, or British Mission, or all three, then Koreans would have, as a result of these conspiracies, over Half of the entire Presbyterian Communion today.

9 million may be Presbyterians or claimed as Presbyterians according to Wikipedia and various sources, particularly during Presbyterian Presidents in South Korea.


Presbyterian Church of South Korea
The history of Presbyterianism in South Korea is part of an active, vibrant, controlled narrative involving South Korea, in a region of Political activity uncomprehended by the sedentary American mind. I once read an entire book already available in English on Exactly why the international law promotes that the 1910 Annexation of Korea by Japan by Force would not meet standards for any legal international document.

Horace Underwood mainly ,the "millionaire missionary", and his relationship with Horace Allen, meets frequent comment. Horace Allen is the man of action, not the single Minister of the Parish of Korea, that would be Horace Underwood, perhaps to suggest family relation, in a country of the switching of surnames, and family names. Horace Allen would nurse back to health the attempted assassination of a nephew of King Gojong, and ever since, was a trusted ally of Korea in attempting American involvement in politics in Korea, EITHER as the ambassador of America, or the ambassador of Korea TO America wherever that makes more business sense. They successfully setup trollies, telephone line, and innovations in the King's capitol Seoul which should exclude the previous era's mindset from most people's minds, that only by some European invasion of civilization , of a couple officers and personnel, would those nations become Developed. This is Already to be understood as the "Living Space" that Hitler envisioned in removing the Polish people closer to their Russian cousins. Japan used unemployed Samurai to enforce strict economic and social controls of newspaper, communication, economic exchange, and total robbery of land from 100% Korean land ownership to about 20%, within those 30 years, with over 2 million Japanese immigrants looking for space in Korea.

The Presbyterian Church of Korea did comply with Japanese orders to worship at Shinto Shrines. Obviously Presbyterian connection to Shinto, is nonexistent. That's incorrect. They're applauded in Korea as a patriotic organization. Horace Underwood is displayed prominently at the Yonsei University Campus, which similarly, proudly displays its heritage of orace Underwood and Horace Allen's Jejoongwon Hospital on DVD program, as well as the Severance Hospital as the first western medicine hospital in Korea. The mission represents in the Old Order of the 1900's, the Western Nations whom saw themselves as opposed to the the East or the other Barbarians. One could take King Gojong's spare Prussian Uniforms to a particular meaning of Korean history. King Gojong had purged Catholics in his country, while Otto Von Bismarck of international celebration and fame, would be the leader of the Prussian Kulturkampf - Wikipedia.

Then this again presents a direct competition we could imagine to how it is Japan viewed itself as imitating the old order of the Imperial Powers.

Conflicts through Kissinger-like Espionage
We see that the offpsring of Eisenhower's Presbyterianism the PCUSA, has subscribed to the Belhar Confession. https://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/theologyandworship/pdfs/belhar.pdf
This is very similar structure to what they had said in their language with the "Covenant Relationship" with the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad that had "Somehow chose" to "not participate in the Church life" of the PCUSA "due to many Korean hardships".
The Belhar Confession has the PCUSA disclaiming the Communion format of the worldwide Presbyterian Church, in favor of their Indivisible , second protestant reformation, "Always Reforming", outlook.

This would mean where as every Orthodox and Reformed Church in the World now has its own religious heritage safeguarded in the United States, that the Korean Presbyterian Church Abroad came into existence in 1972 through its own sheer will and funding.

We will essentially be grouping their experience with the African American integration during the Eisenhower administration, where no "two separate things can ever be equal". This unspoken conspiracy must be in discouraging the Communist Era alcove of Korean activities.


END Thanks so much.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
-That marked the end of my article formally, or , attempted formality.
I don't have much time, but thanks for posting your beliefs on this.

As far as the above is concerned, it's simply wrong in some parts. The "Bishop of Rome" was recognized in the 2nd Century church as being the one's bishops would go to if there were controversies and disputes that needed to be settled, and that clearly shows up in Ignatius' (of Antioch) letter to Clement (of Rome) saying that the Bishop of Rome had a certain priority because it is where Peter and Paul were executed. Even though the title "Pope" wasn't used until centuries later, only that bishop had the designation of such leadership.

And it is Peter ("Kephas" in Koine Greek, who was changed by Jesus to that name, obviously for a reason), whom is designated by Jesus as being "Rock", which is what "Kephas" translates out to in Koine Greek. At the beginning of that verse, Jesus makes it clear that he's referring to Kephas with "Thou art Peter [Kephas}, and upon that rock... ". And there is a play on words (i.e. "Petros" and "petra") that's involved since Greek is gender sensitive.

It was understood back then that the true church was the Church of Jesus and the Apostles, and all other groups were deemed heretical. In the first two centuries, different names for the Church existed over that span of time, starting with "the Way", then "Christian", and then "Orthodox" (truth) and "Catholic" (universal), but when we get into the 3rd century "Catholic" begins to be most commonly used as its formal name. "Orthodox" wasn't used as a formal name until the Great Schism many centuries later.

The "mark" of the early Church was whether one's bishops (episcopo) could trace their appointments back to the apostles, and it was this [Catholic] Church that eventually decided upon the canon used by the vast majority of Christians worldwide today.

Even Wikipedia covers this quite adequately, btw.
Even the Catholic Church subscribes today to the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian Creed , those city names are in the middle of Byzantine Anatolia in 200-400 AD, that means the "Pope" went and met them there. He came back with those Creeds to his Autocephaly. I think You are totally making up something convenient to you for some reason. So you deposit, that because the Roman slaves were being eaten by lions under the rules of the Roman Emperors for 200 years while the Bible has the successful establishment of the entire Byzantine world's Churches in Biblical times in the Book of Acts, that the persecutorial seat of Rome of any power after the 500 fall of Rome, should be the center of Religion? Your link was of little use.

I don't see why anyone should accept Any of your version of events. So you believe the Pope attacking and Successfully Destroying the Byzantine Empire is of little relevance to the development of Denominations, is that right? The Communicant European Church before the disagreements of supremacies starting in 800 ad and actually emergent in the 1000 AD are said as "Nicene Christianity" or "Chalcedonian Christianity" in HUNDRED unarguable articles.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
-That marked the end of my article formally, or , attempted formality.

Even the Catholic Church subscribes today to the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian Creed , those city names are in the middle of Byzantine Anatolia in 200-400 AD, that means the "Pope" went and met them there. He came back with those Creeds to his Autocephaly. I think You are totally making up something convenient to you for some reason. So you deposit, that because the Roman slaves were being eaten by lions under the rules of the Roman Emperors for 200 years while the Bible has the successful establishment of the entire Byzantine world's Churches in Biblical times in the Book of Acts, that the persecutorial seat of Rome of any power after the 500 fall of Rome, should be the center of Religion? Your link was of little use.

I don't see why anyone should accept Any of your version of events. So you believe the Pope attacking and Successfully Destroying the Byzantine Empire is of little relevance to the development of Denominations, is that right? The Communicant European Church before the disagreements of supremacies starting in 800 ad and actually emergent in the 1000 AD are said as "Nicene Christianity" or "Chalcedonian Christianity" in HUNDRED unarguable articles.

Can you summarize this wall of text?
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Can you summarize this wall of text?
Wellllllll…. I could come up with some more catchy one-liners than I had anticipated...

Land of the Free has Limits.
Big Government thinks its Bigger Than God. -Governor George Wallace 1960 inauguration. Which is true, because we no longer can be the Puritan mind that envisions Oliver Cromwell's "God is King".
FIrst title I ever had on this website was more like, the extreme American Nationalist Patriotism assumes command of the world.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Wellllllll…. I could come up with some more catchy one-liners than I had anticipated...

Land of the Free has Limits.
Big Government thinks its Bigger Than God. -Governor George Wallace 1960 inauguration. Which is true, because we no longer can be the Puritan mind that envisions Oliver Cromwell's "God is King".
FIrst title I ever had on this website was more like, the extreme American Nationalist Patriotism assumes command of the world.

I still don't know what you are talking about and George Wallace was a second cousin of mine.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
I still don't know what you are talking about and George Wallace was a second cousin of mine.
That sounds pretty silly. Strom Thurman said all the Army rifles were forcing Churches to integrate. What if the whole crisis is about promoting the idea that every Church here is divided by schism and none of the Churches here are pre-ordained divided by Autocephaly, like Horace Underwood easily proclaimed the separation of the Korean Church without innovations or divisions. The United States Henry Kissinger type has to divide that Orthodox style group by conspiracy, the United States and Korean religious leadership.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
That sounds pretty silly. Strom Thurman said all the Army rifles were forcing Churches to integrate. What if the whole crisis is about promoting the idea that every Church here is divided by schism and none of the Churches here are pre-ordained divided by Autocephaly, like Horace Underwood easily proclaimed the separation of the Korean Church without innovations or divisions. The United States Henry Kissinger type has to divide that Orthodox style group by conspiracy, the United States and Korean religious leadership.

I loved Strom.. He was so kind to my family.. In fact my daughter gave him her convertible limo in the parade. He did a good job of representing his constituents and hired the first black staffers after the passing of the civil rights act.

So what are you talking about?
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
The only platform of the George Wallace campaign is actually shrouded behind the waterhoses and soundbites and he had a solid mind of the entire history of the State, obviously. He was involved in limiting Federal powers. Integration and equality of Skills and Education and integration and equality from Eisenhower's Civil War era interpretation of "All Men Are Created Equal" blend here to the majority concern of all these parties, which saw Marriage as being the decision of Churches, in definition or performance of the Ceremony. They didn't want racial integration of Churches. The platform eventually wanted to elect George Wallace as President could overturn the Federal Judges on important integration rulings. of couse Clarence Thomas represents the Chief Justice at the Supreme Court today.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Even the Catholic Church subscribes today to the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian Creed , those city names are in the middle of Byzantine Anatolia in 200-400 AD, that means the "Pope" went and met them there. He came back with those Creeds to his Autocephaly.
The eastern and western church were one Church then as the Great Schism didn't occur until much later. Maybe look up the "Great Schism" for confirmation of this, and even the Wiki article on this is a good and unbiased source.

I think You are totally making up something convenient to you for some reason. So you deposit, that because the Roman slaves were being eaten by lions under the rules of the Roman Emperors for 200 years while the Bible has the successful establishment of the entire Byzantine world's Churches in Biblical times in the Book of Acts, that the persecutorial seat of Rome of any power after the 500 fall of Rome, should be the center of Religion?
The above is nothing short of nonsensical babel that takes events out of context.

Your link was of little use.
It's of "little use" to you because it doesn't conform to your predetermined opinion-- that's all. It's a link not from any specific denomination.

Obviously, you have not done the homework on this, so maybe spend some time, and please make sure you use sources not affiliated to any particular denomination.

Until then, ...
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
The eastern and western church were one Church then as the Great Schism didn't occur until much later. Maybe look up the "Great Schism" for confirmation of this, and even the Wiki article on this is a good and unbiased source.

The above is nothing short of nonsensical babel that takes events out of context.

It's of "little use" to you because it doesn't conform to your predetermined opinion-- that's all. It's a link not from any specific denomination.

Obviously, you have not done the homework on this, so maybe spend some time, and please make sure you use sources not affiliated to any particular denomination.

Until then, ...
Your Stuff literally Has No Sensical Logic to it. " They all met the Bishop of Rome because he would know best because its where the blood and bones of all the martyrs just got spilled, proves the letter of Clement". So you are reaching into the Byzantine world of the New Testament Greek where Revelation is concerned with a New Babylon , like the Babylonian Empire and then the Roman Empire were persecutors tax collectors and rights restrictors over the state of Israel, in a metaphor about overthrowing the Roman Emperor, a constant theme of the entire New Testament, and you accept the Whore of Babylon whom John Knox preached the eternal hellfire of Revelation, as a Lord and Master and Antichrist? You reach in there to say Jesus says that. How does the Church Doctor Augustine of Hippo in that tradition trace to the Apostles? The Pope wouldn't recognize any of the twelve brother Apostles in the most dictatorial institution.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Today, the Further Conclusions
Building on this essay and building on raw data, several obvious problems historically about this. Catholics are engaged in ordering disobeying in the Korean culture. Koreans then persecuted catholics in atleast something similar to the Kulturkampf. Then again, can anyone be considered a Presbyterian who disagrees with the only Minister of Korea's focus on the home life. PCUSA will sell us this same story as anti-sexism, is sexism roles of the sexes, then no. Is anti-classism the destruction of being a Rockefeller-backed mission and a personal millionaire missionary, then no. Then Horace Underwood asked that these home furnitures named women traditionally enjoy the innovations of the western age so are the very rare but expensive photography shown where they're out in a row boat, or women the western trolley in Seoul.

Has irrelevance and antiquity made these circumstances possible? Europe had pushed itself on most of the world already before the Ideological age or the Nationalist age. Although Napoleonic France may not fit in any easy categories, we could suggest the Nationalist self-destruction of Europe in World War 1, or the Ideological age that divided along Capitalist/Communist/Fascism.

The civility of the Christian directed Russian Emperor, or the Kingdoms of Europe, or the old world, there's evidence and push back. In the case of Russian royalty, I've been noting Anastasia from Disney, the Rite of Spring is written right at the fall of the Russian Empire. Those unused to Russian music should still recognize a frantic chaos in the music score. The tale is of pagans before the Christianity, Communists we should assume, and the sacrifice during the ceremony of Spring of a young woman to dance to death, accompanied by the 200 year old woman and the Old Sage and Rus' Tribesmen.

By contrast America's Hail Columbia again echoes marriage relations of Washington and the District of Columbia, or like his portraiture that Martha Washington had chosen the spot for the capitol, or the new Whitehouse.

The acceptance of the King and Yangban and Korea reflect , as they said, association of the Western Nations. The autonomy of no aggression especially in Church politics, if the Russian Orthodox , which is actually an offshoot branch of Orthodoxy proclaiming itself Byzantine Empire anew, suggests a superior relationship of that Russian Orthodox Church to new members.

The Christians so comfortable in their institutions are never made aware of their alien nature. There are concubines, harems, prostitutions, rites of spring, various non Christian institutions Throughout the world before and after Christianity. Pagans at any level do not focus on nuclear family development. Muslims actively argue the increased effectiveness over Christianity of Bulls over harems, or the 2-year contract to produce children to a Sultan for instance. Muslim men are allowed up to 3 "wives". The Christian slavery is different in some ways to a more common sex slavery in Islam, a converted Muslim must be let go at once as well.

The Hindus practice different yet similar practices . The Confucian world practices different but similar practices. A man might adopt a newer wife along side another wife. Children and wives travel behind the master of a household , there is especially a specific kind of slavery that can occur.

Then the Catholics may also be a different practice. Muslims may have just a Husband and a wife's Father approve a marriage and its sealed. The consent in Catholicism is also largely at question, religion can seal betrothed matches at young ages. There are international events at the marriage of the Royalty of different countries. Marrying a non-Christian wife in Catholicism used to be advanced in cuasing conversion of the woman, while the Reformed Westminster Confession demands no 'yoking of two different animals'.

Further I briefly discussed to political importance today to Korea that the PCUSA is distancing from. Korea did not suffer Western Imperialism. It suffered under Japanese Imperialism. The suggestion of association with Western Nations in traditional Christianity is no way and no longer a clear suggestion by PCUSA. Yonsei University has in all aspects this suggestion centered on Horace Underwood. Prosperity is also a suggestion.

Christians have developed gallantry, chivalry, from Spain to Polish knights saving Ladies from Mongolian hordes, and Knights who Defeat Dragons are the subject of the White Army during the Russian Revolution.

So I can conclude that there is a broad problem of racism in the world, but then what are Cassus Belli , causes of war, to the Europeans throughout the Imperial period? Imperial Britain had at most 300,000 officers at any given time in India, already 400 million people, that's a cooperative relationship. 2 Million Japanese immigrated to Korea in a tiny country of about 12 million.

Religious Cassus Belli and Holy War are solid domains of the Reconquista, the reconquest, that Castile, Leon, Aragon, Portugal, Spain, it recaptured Iberia. Byzantines of course held less celebrated Holy ar in effect, or defense, against seljuk Turks, or with allies, to less effect. Orthodoxy of course cooperates today, tis of course a widely noticed institution today, say for instance the Ukrainian orthodox Church developing, or Putin's Church. Religious Casus Belli is obvious in the Pope's Crusade to Jerusalem which produces no command there today. Lithuania vs the Teutonic Knights would produce Prussia.

There is racism in religion, of assuming that prejudicely a race is stereotypically immoral and not in religion, like Dixie. This is solidly the case. Its solidly taught to children that there is a hierarchy of learning, of teaching and books, and that the salve race is at the bottom, solidly. Robert E Lee proclaimed Christianity should free the slaves. Thomas Stonewall Jackson proclaimed that God had instituted slavery. He proclaimed the Old Testament defense of a holy Land. Nowhere is Horace Underwood, Northern Presbyterian, often discussing the New York parish or India, interested in any antagonism, or harm, internationally, to have proven Koreans and Yangban capable of picking up the New Testament.

Colonial Casus Belli is Sometimes existant totally separately from Religion. The British Empire Company never Slightly has a claim on India through religion. No discrimination , no evangelism was ever promoted in India. The Belgian Companies, the British Companies, or like East Africa, operated on pretty much the same causes. The Spanish Casus Belli is mixed on most all occasions, that the Pope commanded a New World Crusade to Convert the Americas, but the plunder and personal goals of the Spanish are very evident.

Any other conversion outside Europe in the colonial and modern Era has occurred by the Religious institution's efforts.

Napoleon's "Laicite" for America

So if someone proclaimed us not too long ago part of the "Christian Nations",I think its a wide world where people understood that. There were places totally not part of that , such as West Africa. In 1860 the joke was loud about Ethiopia being the Christian Kingdom of Africa. The Nations have not move much today since the 1900's where we are concerned with Religion. Modern Conflict is not today concerned with Religion. World War 2 involved Fascists , deriding religion, Communists, destroying religion, and Japanese imperialists, destroying religion, and Franklin Roosevelt kindly appearing as an Anglican, to Winston Churchill's Anglican service aboard an HMS ship.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Governments are requiring Napoleonic Laicite when we can imagine no scenarios in which Moral habit and character of the people comes into full professional conduct. The proposition of Laicite, after having drowned monks and Nuns in 'republican marriage', is that the State itself is threatened , society is threatened by intrusion at the citizen-level of religion. The strange new application has been having no Muslim hair-coverings in school, this is a public mark of a private matter, it'd be wearing underwear on your head, isn't that right? They also cannot wear any crosses in French schools, Universities, or Employment we should assume.

What the United States borrowed from France was "Fraternity, Liberty, Equality", without "Laicite". The seemingly small position is causing havoc in many ways. We know about Religious Accommodation just like other Reasonable Accommodations, Employers cannot try to put a Religious worker on Sunday hours and put Atheist workers on Saturday hours. Extended outward, Diligent and not just Reasonable conduct is to give prayer mats to a Muslim student, Diligent behavior is how Eisenhower saw every American to protect a Mosque like every other Religion, whom set the 2nd term course of the United Presbyterians and the PCUSA. When the Developed Western Nations in Canada's United Church of Canada or Australia's Uniting Church have destroyed the Denomination.

This problem exists that Moral Character of our people in Christian practice is unidentified. Without proving any Personal quality of Myself, having not socialized with anyone, or needing clarifications on any religious topics, we should assume that Professors, Employers, Government, will negligently lean toward discriminating Students on the topic of engrained Moral character in Religion of these United States.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
The current, non-evangelistic, non-Pentecostal, non-revival, non-enthusiastic, non-charismatic, non-Free will, Establishment, if the United States has Establishment, is a bureaucratic mess, under constant courtroom editing. Eisenhower's in-house conversion with Presbyterianism, from Presbyterian suggestion introduced "Under God" to the previous pledge of allegiance. The motto "In God We Trust" is the Current motto of the United States, which Eisenhower has institution. The National Presbyterian Church in Washington has hosted some events. I've never needed , ached, expressed, anything to anyone before Presbyterianism besides accounting and graduating in Accounting afterwards. Succeeding in Accounting related jobs. A majority of Asians aren't aware of a discussion of religion I ever made relevant in contact with me. Koreans self-identify in business environments all their positions. Reasonable accommodation exists. The courts have decided that "In God We Trust" since the 70's has indicated a more vague Higher Power without Christian belief, and that we're against Establishment which is ruled out in the 1st amendment.

Every professor of an entire Business Building will have ordered no more communication, have security concerns to remove people from campus, will have denied further Applications for Graduate School, this will have been Harmfully and Openly associated not on 4.0 gpas or 750 gmats set aside expressively with pushing Religion which individuals have no evidential need for at any time.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Further, Further Conclusions
Our entire society is going to remain focused on "Asian American". "Asian American" allows for a few phrases of schooling concerning the diversity of "Asian Americans" while the diversity is openly sacrificed or demanded by US Government Citizenship. Julia and Anna Jackson of whom Stonewall Jackson had memorized the Shorter Catechism together would represent 100 year residents only displaying a Scottish religious flag, Scottish medals of valor are displayed, in the appropriate conduct of resident Scotspeople.

This will all persecute the most generic of students, in a pool of students driving to the University, with no part whatsoever in it social life, who take any and without bias any extra credit and remain focused on that credit for 3 years of our Colleges, it will attack that Korean Americans, professed immigration from an ROK homeland, who offer very open generic and friendly and safe attainment as publicly as possible in classroom announcements with equal attainment. Universities will hear Asian and destroy their own decisions. We've made some choice of students racial identifications or national identifications. What their white in-state students of careful attention should be sacrificed to pretend distractions for the public universities who quest for social acknowledgment and international recognition, will knock over their most straightforward students.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
I can't have made the initiative on their campus for any of the problems that face me at any time. What Presbyterianism has done is produce chaotic insanity. The people with racial biased decisionmaking and national origin comments and actions will be just fine with their care. All sides will attack that I have any actions I take on any biases about any history of any peoples when that's impossible. There are no judgments I ever produce or state anywhere. They don't have any judgment I make about any people in emails.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
Their professors officially defend putting sexual Asian images, accusing 6 year older student leaders of being like all other younger Asians that we all have this post free-love hippie student environment, make all Open accusations of insulting nature and supervise throwing students on an insulting Facebook experience where everyone Disclaimed any Persons being ther,e just their general stereotypes of useless white racist arrogance the professors already expound.
 
Top