not even of himself?
No.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
not even of himself?
I find Daniel 11:32-43 is in connection to the both changing King of the North, and King of the South roles.
In our time frame, the King of the North was the episode of the Communist bloc including the cold war era.
Whereas the King of the South saw the world power come from England to America, an Anglo-American power.
Seems as if Now the King of the North could Now be in connection to the 8th King of Revelation 17:11.
Thus, none of those Kings are the God of the Bible.
However, Jesus, as King of God's Kingdom government of Daniel 2:44, reigns over Earth for a thousand years before Jesus will hand back God's Kingdom to his God at the end of his millennium-long day of governing over Earth as per 1 Corinthians 15:24-26.
from the link you provided
In ancient times the priests were persons dedicated to God (Ezek. xliv. 20; I Sam. i. 11), and it follows from the juxtaposition of prophets and Nazarites (Amos ii. 11-12) that the latter must have been regarded as in a sense priests.
Jesus was referred to as a priest, rabbi, prophet.
History of the Christian Religion to the Year Two Hundred
The Essenes: Their History and Doctrines ; And, The Kabbalah : Its Doctrines ...
None of which proves a Jesus jump to Essene.
That "history" has a bunch of junk in it. He talks about Zealots and the Sicarri and says these were Essene. He says the Zealots were called Sicarri after 54 AD. and they are the Essenes.
In reality the Iskariōtēs" and Zelotes were Guerilla fighters, fighting for Jewish freedom from the Romans.
The Bible says one of Jesus' apostles was called Iscariot, and another Zelotes, obviously before 54 AD.
And again - Guerrilla fighters not a religious group "Essene." Guerrilla fighters did not become the Essenes.
Judas Iscariot and Simon called Zelotes,
Luk 6:15 Matthew and Thomas, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon called Zelotes,
Luk 6:16 And Judas the brother of James, and Judas Iscariot, which also was the traitor.
Joh 6:71 He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve.
Zēlōtēs
The same as G2207; a Zealot, that is, (specifically) partisan for Jewish political independence: - Zelotes.
"Zealot" the name given to members of the extreme nationalist party founded about A.D. by Judas of Gamala"
"Iscariot" "Iskariōtēs" identifies Judas as a member of the Sicarii These were Jewish rebels intent on driving the Romans out of Judea.
We know of the Sicarii from later historians that wrote about them.
It is very interesting that both father and son have identifiers which are Guerrilla - Freedom Fighter groups.
Interesting that they are part of Jesus' circle, and pack short fighting swords (machaira), while Jesus is stirring up the crowds, and eventually gets killed for his actions.
*
Jesus isn't God, - nor did he ever say he was.
He taught Tanakh, - ONE God, - and claimed he was the awaited Jewish Messiah, - whom was to be a special HUMAN from the line of King David.
*
The Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe Jesus was human. They believe he was a reincarnated angel.I agree with you ^ above ^ because of Jesus' own words at John 10:36 where Jesus says he is God's Son.
Even gospel writer John wrote at Revelation 1:5; Revelation 3:14 that Jesus is the beginning of the creation by God.
So, only God was before the beginning as per Psalms 90:2, so Jesus was Not before the beginning as God was before the beginning - Colossians 1:15.
The Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe Jesus was human. They believe he was a reincarnated angel.
Who Is Michael the Archangel? Is Jesus? | Bible TeachI can't find what you wrote ^ above ^ at their offical web site at www.jw.org.
Their?their
What I meant was when you say, "their" you exclude yourself. Are you not one of them?Yes, their offical web site is www.jw.org
It doesn't say he "has the voice of an archangel." En is more often translated in.I find at 1 Thessalonians 4:16 that the 'Lord' mentioned there is Lord Jesus, and according to that verse Lord Jesus has the voice of the Archangel. Jesus in Scripture is also: Son of man (human but sinless).
When his God resurrected the dead Jesus he was resurrected back to his pre-human spirit body.
Did Jesus explicitly, or implicitly, oppose Deut 5:8-9
"You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,
Was Idolatry the abomination that caused desolation for nebuchadnezzar?
I'm just curious as to how you come by
( Punishing ) in Deut 5:9?
When it's Written ( Visiting )
How do you come by to visit someone to come to be punishing them ?
It just means that God saw, seen, their
father's iniquity to be seen upon their children up to the third and fourth generation. Which has nothing to do with punishing.
Did Jesus explicitly, or implicitly, oppose Deut 5:8-9
"You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,
Was Idolatry the abomination that caused desolation for nebuchadnezzar?
Zealots Also Essenes.
"For some of these observe a still more rigid practise in not handling or looking at a coin which has an image, nor will they even enter a city at the gates of which statues are erected [comp. Yer. 'Ab. Zarah iii. 42b, 43b]. Others again threaten to slay any Gentile taking part in a discourse about God and His Law if he refuses to be circumcised [comp. Sanh. 59a, Ex.R. xxxiii.]. From this they were called 'Zealots' [Ḳanna'im] by some, 'Sicarii' by others. Others again will call no one lord except God, even though they be tortured or killed.
Not sure what you are trying to say here?
Carefully reread my post.
Also note I used the Christian translation of Zealot.
Zēlōtēs
The same as G2207; a Zealot, that is, (specifically) partisan for Jewish political independence: - Zelotes.
Your link had misinformation.
For instance it says the 54AD.
That "history" has a bunch of junk in it. He talks about Zealots and the Sicarri and says these were Essene. He says the Zealots were called Sicarri after 54 AD. and they are the Essenes.
In reality the Iskariōtēs" and Zelotes were different Guerrilla fighters, fighting for Jewish freedom from the Romans.
The Bible says one of Jesus' apostles was an Iscariot, and another a Zelotes, obviously before 54 AD.
And again - Guerrilla fighters not a religious group "Essene." Guerrilla fighters did not become the Essenes.
Obviously they are different groups that we can read about.
Even just using the Bible - we can see they are separate, as Jesus has a named Zelote, and Sicarri, at the same time, - and obviously before 54AD as Jesus is alive.
One group did not go through three name changes.
Why would Guerrilla fighters/warriors become celibate desert monks? They wouldn't.
"A third faction, the Essenes, emerged out of disgust with the other two. This sect believed the others had corrupted the city and the Temple. They moved out of Jerusalem and lived a monastic life in the desert, adopting strict dietary laws and a commitment to celibacy." Pharisees, Sadducees & Essenes
"Essene, member of a religious sect or brotherhood that flourished in Palestine from about the 2nd century bc to the end of the 1st century ad. Essene | ancient Jewish sect
Note the dates. We therefore have all three listed separately during the same time period, including while Jesus was alive, and obviously well before 54 AD.
Wiki has an interesting page on the Essenes. Essenes - Wikipedia
*