Isaiah 49:22.

[John D. Brey]

Although every verse in the latter chapters of Isaiah seems central to understanding the whole amazing puzzle of the prophesy, there's cause, as well as sound exegesis, to support a claim that Isaiah 49:22 is the pièce de résistance, the central piece, required to overcome the book's resistance to a more naked revelation of its unthinkable glory. Furthermore, two former exegetical excursions into the chapter (Isaiah 49:16, and Isaiah 49:18) revealed that it's not just the text of the prophet that's resistant to a more naked revelation of its glory since the Jewish guardians of the text have crowned their servitude to God by placing something like a thorny fence around the spirit of the text in order to keep anyone out who's not at least as serious as they are in their unguarded desire to guard traditional orthodoxy.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

Although every verse in the latter chapters of Isaiah seems central to understanding the whole amazing puzzle of the prophesy, there's cause, as well as sound exegesis, to support a claim that Isaiah 49:22 is the pièce de résistance, the central piece, required to overcome the book's resistance to a more naked revelation of its unthinkable glory. Furthermore, two former exegetical excursions into the chapter (Isaiah 49:16, and Isaiah 49:18) revealed that it's not just the text of the prophet that's resistant to a more naked revelation of its glory since the Jewish guardians of the text have crowned their servitude to God by placing something like a thorny fence around the spirit of the text in order to keep anyone out who's not at least as serious as they are in their unguarded desire to guard traditional orthodoxy.

It would probably seem strange to follow up the statement that a person need take the prophet as, or more, serious than his kin folk (in order to pass beyond the thorns that crown their protective services to God) with the suggestion that the key to Isaiah 49:22 exists in 2 Samuel 1:18:

(Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the book of Jasher.)​

Does that verse clarify this:

Thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I will lift up mine hand to the Gentiles, and set up my standard to the People [of Israel].​

On the surface one might say that one of these verses is not like the other; one of these verses just doesn't belong. And yet cutting more than skin deep reveals that indeed 2 Samuel 1:18, properly interpreted, is the key to Isaiah 49:22. Which is all a somewhat long-winded attempt to justify the exegesis of 2 Samuel 1:18 in the service of a thread about the meaning of Isaiah 49:22.



John

 

[Muffled]

I believe Ephesians 2:8,9 best describe the essence of this chapter.

 

[John D. Brey]

I believe Ephesians 2:8,9 best describe the essence of this chapter.

In a general sense the verses you mention could be called the essence of the entire Bible. And yet Isaiah 49:22 has some specificity that requires some elbow grease in order to make its meaning more salubrious.



John

 

[sun rise]

Jewish guardians of the text

Who are those "Jewish guardians" you refer to and what is your evidence that they manifest their

unguarded desire to guard traditional orthodoxy.

 

[John D. Brey]

Who are those "Jewish guardians" you refer to and what is your evidence that they manifest their

Everything the typical reader of the Tanakh reads comes from the Masoretic text; which is the traditional interpretation of the text of the various books in the Tanakh. Every English translation of the "Old Testament" (the Tanakh) comes from the Masoretic text.

What non-students of the Tanakh often don't realize is that the Masoretic text is not a plain and simple rendition of what the Hebrew text says. It's an interpretation of the Hebrew text based on a traditional set of presuppositions about what the text must be saying for the pre-intepretive presuppositions and traditions to be correct. The Hebrew text is subject to an incredible number of legitimate interpretations many of which would seem incredible to someone who misunderstands the broad nature of the Hebrew text. And that's particularly true where a literal and faithful interpretation of the Hebrew text appears to refute, and or contradict, the Masoretic interpretation of the text.

Case in point.

In Genesis chapter 17, which is Judaism's marching orders, the Masoretic text, that's the source of the interpretation translated to English, implies, verse 9, that Abraham's offspring shall "keep" the covenant established in the chapter. The Hebrew word translated "keep" is שמר (shamar, shamor, or samar) which literally interpreted means "guard." The natural offspring of Abraham are to "guard" the covenant not "keep" the covenant; and definitely not keep the covenant for themselves.

Abraham's natural offspring aren't the target of the covenant in Genesis 17. That would be (i.e., the target of the covenant) the offspring of Zion personified, i.e., Abraham's spiritual offspring through his spiritual seed who isn't either Isaac, Jacob, nor any of their immediate family.

Not only does the Masoretic text interpret the Hebrew in often self-ingratiating ways, but the Masoretes are not beyond an occasional twist of the scribal wrist to throw off the sectarians, which means those of that other Jewish originated faith.

The corrected interpretation of 2 Samuel 1:18 shows that that verse is a case in point concerning how changing the meaning of a single word, or even letter, can change the meaning of the entire Bible, and therein manipulate or even distort the cultural phenomenon that's generated according to the perceived meaning of the book of truth.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

The corrected interpretation of 2 Samuel 1:18 shows that that verse is a case in point concerning how changing the meaning of a single word, or even letter, can change the meaning of the entire Bible, and therein manipulate or even distort the cultural phenomenon that's generated according to the perceived meaning of the book of truth.

An expanded context for 2 Samuel 1:18 is as follows:

And he [David] smote him [the Amalekite] that he did die. And David said unto him, Thy blood be upon thy head; for thy mouth hath testified against thee saying, I have slain the Lord's anointed [messiah משיח]. And David lamented with this lamentation over Saul and over Jonathan his son: (Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold it is written in the book of Jasher.) The beauty of Israel is slain upon thy high places.​

The key word in this pointy but not that sharp interpretation/translation of the Hebrew text is the word "bow" קשת (qeset). The great Hebrew scholar, Rabbi Samson R. Hirsch, informs us not only about the meaning of the word, but his deep knowledge of the Hebrew language, schools us concerning what's going on in 2 Samuel 1:18:

In Rabbinic literature, קשט also means, "to adorn.". . At the same time, it is significant that there is also an obvious relationship with קשת, "bow," and, in Aramaic, קשט itself my also be employed to mean, "to shoot arrows.". . In this context, either meaning ("bow" or "adornment") would be quite appropriated for the word קשט.

The Hirsch Tehillim, 60:6.​

Since the words קשת and קשט are interchangeable (to mean either "bow," or "ornament"), it's patently obvious which word belongs in 2 Samuel 1:18. The word should be קשט not קשת (a tet ט not a tav ת) since the very next verse speaks of the "ornament" of Israel, i.e., the ornament that adorns Israel, beautifies Israel, the beauty of Israel, slain on the altar of Israel: "The beauty of Israel is slain upon thy high places."

Correcting this one word, one letter really, has an effect on the interpretation of 2 Samuel 1:18 that's literally impossible to overestimate since it leads us directly into the true thoughts in David's mind when he speaks his elegiac prophetic utterance.

Israel's first king, the anointed of God, has just been killed (the "anointed" king is always a representation of Israel's true king, Messiah, who isn't himself anointed, since he inherits the throne by birth, but is himself the anointer). Saul, has just been killed by the hand of an Amalekite. David's prophetic utterance that the Beauty of Israel will be slain on the altar of Israel is based on David referencing the prototype and quintessential textual support for his prophetic statement. We read in Exodus 17:8-15 (emphasis mine):

8 Then came Amalek, and fought with Israel in Rephidim. 9 And Moses said unto Joshua, Choose us out men, and go out, fight with Amalek: tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in mine hand. . .11 And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed: and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. . . 13 And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. 14 And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven. 15 And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Jehovah['s]-Banner:​

When the Israelites strike down the Amalekites, who are the age-old enemy of God (as the Amalekite has just been struck down in 2 Samuel 1:18), Moses erects an altar he names "Yahweh's Banner" יהוה נס. The "rod of God," lifted up in Moses' hand, presages the very lifting up in God's hand of the Beauty of Israel, when God declares war on his enemies by lifting the Beauty of Israel in his right hand.

And by way of the Truth, during the time of exile He hath cast down from heaven unto the earth the beauty of Israel. He, therefore states that now in an acceptable time He will lift His hand to the highest heavens, the reference being to the great hand that fights on behalf of Israel.

Ramban, Commentary on the Torah, Deuteronomy 32:40.​

Moses takes the "rod of God," later ornamented with brass, and thus named Nehushtan, i.e., God's right hand of power, and he places it on an altar which he therefore names either "Yahweh's Banner," or else, "Yahweh the Banner," the exegesis allows either interpretation.

It's this very narrative, defeating Amalek just prior to erecting the ornament of ornaments, Yahweh's Banner, Yahweh the Banner, that's passing through David's mind when right after the death of the Amalekite who strikes down God's anointed (משיח), David literally remembers Moses' striking down the Amalekites (the enemy of Israel), with the Beauty of Israel lifted in his right hand (Exodus 17:9), just prior to turning the rod of God, the ornament of Israel's salvation, Nehushtan, as it were, and was, into an altar (Exodus 17:14), the Banner, that's in the cross hairs of sound exegesis of Isaiah 49:22.

Thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I will lift up mine hand to the Gentiles, and set up my Banner to the People [of Israel].​

In his prophetic brilliance, David intuits the meaning of Moses placing the Banner of Yahweh יהוה נס (the Lord's Banner, or the Lord as Banner) on an altar such that David remarks in remarkable fashion that the Beauty of Israel, the right hand of God, will be cast down from heaven, and slain on the altars במתי of Israel. "Jehovah's Banner," Jehovah the Banner, is the altar where the rod of God is placed, by the hand of Moses, when by means of the lifting of that rod, on that hill, God defeats the age old enemy of Israel. When David defeats, destroys, the hand of the Amalekite, who struck down God's anointed, his mind immediately hearkens back to Exodus 17, such that he immediately replies that the rod of God, the Beauty of Israel, Israel's Salvation, will be slain on a hill in Israel, on the altar of Israel.

Since this transparently correct exegesis of the text has been guarded by an orlah, or covering, of the Masoretes' own making, for so long, no stone should remain unturned in authenticating this reading of the text. . . Which is where David's reference to the book of Jasher comes in.




John

 

[John D. Brey]

Since this transparently correct exegesis of the text has been guarded by an orlah, or covering, of the Masoretes' own making, for so long, no stone should remain unturned in authenticating this reading of the text. . . Which is where David's reference to the book of Jasher comes in.

Not wanting anything to do with what David is saying, the Jewish exegetes mangle the Hebrew beyond belief: "he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow as it is written in the book of Jasher."

The book of Jasher is not an archery instruction manual. And there's nothing in it about bows and arrows such that at this intense moment of prophetic emotion David's mind contemplates teaching Israel archery (the word interpreted "bow" speaks of, the Lord the Banner, the beauty of Israel, her priestly ornamentation).

And although it's not an archery manual, nevertheless, there's a narrative in the book of Jasher that fits David's mind-set at this moment of prophetic importance when he's meditating on the death of the messiah (anointed) of God (at the hand of his enemies). The narrative David employs is found in Jasher chapter 23. It's here that we find the story David employs to spit out his elegiac ode concerning the Beauty of Israel being slain on the altars of Israel. In Jasher 23, Satan confronts Abraham on the way to slaying Isaac on the first altar of Israel. In the narrative Satan says to Isaac:

Now therefore, my son, do not listen nor attend to him, for he is a silly old man, and let not thy precious soul and the beauty of Israel be lost from the earth.

Jasher 23:31.​

Even as the anointed kings of Israel are all symbolic of the one true king, Messiah, Isaac, as the symbolic firstborn Jew, symbolizes Messiah, who is the first spiritual son of Abraham: the first son of a new spiritual species, conceived, and born, uniquely, rather than the old fashioned way. Therefore, Isaac's sacrifice, on the altar, represents the beauty of Israel, Israel's firstborn, being sacrificed on the altar, such that it's this sacrifice, of the beauty of Israel, the firstborn of Israel, that's passing through David's elevated mind right after the sword descends on the Amalekite.



John

 

[Yahcubs777]

Everything the typical reader of the Tanakh reads comes from the Masoretic text; which is the traditional interpretation of the text of the various books in the Tanakh. Every English translation of the "Old Testament" (the Tanakh) comes from the Masoretic text.

What non-students of the Tanakh often don't realize is that the Masoretic text is not a plain and simple rendition of what the Hebrew text says. It's an interpretation of the Hebrew text based on a traditional set of presuppositions about what the text must be saying for the pre-intepretive presuppositions and traditions to be correct. The Hebrew text is subject to an incredible number of legitimate interpretations many of which would seem incredible to someone who misunderstands the broad nature of the Hebrew text. And that's particularly true where a literal and faithful interpretation of the Hebrew text appears to refute, and or contradict, the Masoretic interpretation of the text.

Case in point.

In Genesis chapter 17, which is Judaism's marching orders, the Masoretic text, that's the source of the interpretation translated to English, implies, verse 9, that Abraham's offspring shall "keep" the covenant established in the chapter. The Hebrew word translated "keep" is שמר (shamar, shamor, or samar) which literally interpreted means "guard." The natural offspring of Abraham are to "guard" the covenant not "keep" the covenant; and definitely not keep the covenant for themselves.

Abraham's natural offspring aren't the target of the covenant in Genesis 17. That would be (i.e., the target of the covenant) the offspring of Zion personified, i.e., Abraham's spiritual offspring through his spiritual seed who isn't either Isaac, Jacob, nor any of their immediate family.

Not only does the Masoretic text interpret the Hebrew in often self-ingratiating ways, but the Masoretes are not beyond an occasional twist of the scribal wrist to throw off the sectarians, which means those of that other Jewish originated faith.

The corrected interpretation of 2 Samuel 1:18 shows that that verse is a case in point concerning how changing the meaning of a single word, or even letter, can change the meaning of the entire Bible, and therein manipulate or even distort the cultural phenomenon that's generated according to the perceived meaning of the book of truth.



John

The corrected interpretation of 2 Samuel 1:18 shows that that verse is a case in point concerning how changing the meaning of a single word, or even letter, can change the meaning of the entire Bible, and therein manipulate or even distort the cultural phenomenon that's generated according to the perceived meaning of the book of truth.

Exactly, and that is what happened over time. And today it is far worse than ever before.

 

[Yahcubs777]

Not wanting anything to do with what David is saying, the Jewish exegetes mangle the Hebrew beyond belief: "he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow as it is written in the book of Jasher."

The book of Jasher is not an archery instruction manual. And there's nothing in it about bows and arrows such that at this intense moment of prophetic emotion David's mind contemplates teaching Israel archery (the word interpreted "bow" speaks of, the Lord the Banner, the beauty of Israel, her priestly ornamentation).

And although it's not an archery manual, nevertheless, there's a narrative in the book of Jasher that fits David's mind-set at this moment of prophetic importance when he's meditating on the death of the messiah (anointed) of God (at the hand of his enemies). The narrative David employs is found in Jasher chapter 23. It's here that we find the story David employs to spit out his elegiac ode concerning the Beauty of Israel being slain on the altars of Israel. In Jasher 23, Satan confronts Abraham on the way to slaying Isaac on the first altar of Israel. In the narrative Satan says to Isaac:

Now therefore, my son, do not listen nor attend to him, for he is a silly old man, and let not thy precious soul and the beauty of Israel be lost from the earth.

Jasher 23:31.​

Even as the anointed kings of Israel are all symbolic of the one true king, Messiah, Isaac, as the symbolic firstborn Jew, symbolizes Messiah, who is the first spiritual son of Abraham: the first son of a new spiritual species, conceived, and born, uniquely, rather than the old fashioned way. Therefore, Isaac's sacrifice, on the altar, represents the beauty of Israel, Israel's firstborn, being sacrificed on the altar, such that it's this sacrifice, of the beauty of Israel, the firstborn of Israel, that's passing through David's elevated mind right after the sword descends on the Amalekite.



John

Even as the anointed kings of Israel are all symbolic of the one true king, Messiah, Isaac, as the symbolic firstborn Jew, symbolizes Messiah, who is the first spiritual son of Abraham: the first son of a new spiritual species, conceived, and born, uniquely, rather than the old fashioned way. Therefore, Isaac's sacrifice, on the altar, represents the beauty of Israel, Israel's firstborn, being sacrificed on the altar, such that it's this sacrifice, of the beauty of Israel, the firstborn of Israel, that's passing through David's mind right after the sword passes through the Amalekite.

I understand where you are going with this, but Abraham was not supposed to kill Isaac. For how can death lead you to GOD? Abraham, contending for the convenant to be called "Father of many" was supposed to prove it by giving his Son Isaac, back to GOD alive. For Enoch was the first to be given back to GOD alive, and the one who gave him back is Father Adam. Abraham, was supposed to do as Father Adam did, and return his son to GOD alive, by transfiguration in life.

Abraham, is also defining the GOD, who gave birth to the first born, Adam. Father Adam is the Son of GOD and and the Principal Ancestor of the Mankind Race. Father Adam trained Enoch who is the first Angel of the Church, to the point that Enoch transfigured in life. And Enoch pleased GOD. Abraham, was supposed to do that with Isaac. But Abraham wasn't understanding the messages that GOD was sending to him. That is why HE came to Abraham as Melchizadek, and brought him bread and wine, which is pointing to Revelations from GOD, and then it is written that HE said: walk perfect before to me, which shows that Abraham was not doing well.

The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, the Titan of the Mankind Race, the Beauty of Israel, is Father Adam, the Son of GOD. For he set the Altar, for the alteration of his glory state, to migrate his physical body to the mortal state, so that procreation would be possible. That only two trees were mentioned, the others were not, only served to keep the truth hidden. But Father Adam ate from 12 trees in the Garden of Eden, and each tree preset the functions and abilities they would have in the fallen state. And it was the 13th tree that was called: The tree of knowledge of good and evil that they ate from. So Father Adam set the altar for the fall, and then ate from the tree that would migrate their physical body to the mortal state. And he needed to eat from each tree in the correct order, else it would have caused serious problems for us in a mortal body.

And this was revealed in the life of Jacob, who had 12 sons, and one daughter. And the Daugher, was called Dinah. That was not by mistake. That 13th tree, which caused the fall, affected their body. And the woman defines the body. This is the exegesis of Genesis. its not something that you will find in any book. And you can believe me or don't, thats up to you. I am not mincing words, this is what i have known, by Revelations being dispensed in the earth today by a certain preacher.

And Father Adam His Eminence body was not made of dust like it was written. Moses, being the Law was not able to get to the height of the Prophet. So everything he said was literalised. But the Prophet, can reach that height of Revelation. Father Adam His Eminence body, was coupled by 12 Most precious Stones, which GOD took from HIS own substance, and baked them into 12 Most Precious Stones, and buried them in the earth before the fall in strategic places in the earth. And that is how the earth was baptized into them. Then HE took them out, and coupled the body of Father Adam with them, in HIS image,and after HIS likeness. Moses could only get to the height of, what moulded the body was taken from the ground. And that is why there is a Precious Stone for each tribe.

And Father Adam Produced his model Type, Mother Eve. And GOD took a rib from Father Adam body to couple the body for Mother Eve because that is where you can get all 12 Most Precious Stones from,the RNA and DNA of Man before the fall. And then HE gave them their mission, which is to Procreate, and to subdue the systems of the terrestrial earth, and to transfigure the terrestrial earth into a heavens world. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Well ive explained alot here. As I said believe me or dont its up to you. I decided to share this with you because you seem to be a good student of the bible and have insight that others lack.

 

[John D. Brey]

Even as the anointed kings of Israel are all symbolic of the one true king, Messiah, Isaac, as the symbolic firstborn Jew, symbolizes Messiah, who is the first spiritual son of Abraham: the first son of a new spiritual species, conceived, and born, uniquely, rather than the old fashioned way. Therefore, Isaac's sacrifice, on the altar, represents the beauty of Israel, Israel's firstborn, being sacrificed on the altar, such that it's this sacrifice, of the beauty of Israel, the firstborn of Israel, that's passing through David's elevated mind right after the sword descends on the Amalekite.

It's specifically the connection between Moses erecting the Lord as a Banner (Exodus 17:14), and David's remembrance of that event when the messiah of Israel, the anointed king, Saul, is slain (2 Samuel 1:18), that's passing through Isaiah's elevated mind in chapter 49 (specifically verse 22) where he, Isaiah, prophesies God lifting his hand to the Gentiles, and setting up the Lord the Banner for the People [of Israel], such that having been put in their correct place allows them to become the filter for properly interpreting the second part of the verse: Isaiah 49 verse 22. The Masoretically malfeasant interpretation, translates into English as follows:

And they shall bring thy sons in their arms and, and thy daughters shall be carried upon their shoulders.​

The connective-vav (translated "And") between speaking of the lifting of the Lord the Banner, and the activities of the sons and daughter in the cross hairs of that lifting, means that what follows (the activities of the sons and daughters) is directly related to what comes before, i.e., the lifting of the Lord the Banner, such that the activities of the sons and daughters are connected by the connective-vav. In other words, the bringing in their arms, and wearing around their shoulders, is in some direct and meaningful way directly related to God lifting his hand with the Banner of the Lord in it?

The Masoretes muff it up. It's not the sons and daughters being brought in the arms and on the shoulders of the Gentiles that's being connected to God lifting up his Banner for the Gentiles, and the People of Israel. It's the Banner of the Lord that's being worn, not in the "arms" חצן, but in the "bosom" (the correct interpretation of חען), of the Gentiles and the People of Israel (as was thoroughly exegeted in the threads Isaiah 49:18, and Isaiah 49:16).



John

 

[John D. Brey]

Even as the anointed kings of Israel are all symbolic of the one true king, Messiah, Isaac, as the symbolic firstborn Jew, symbolizes Messiah, who is the first spiritual son of Abraham: the first son of a new spiritual species, conceived, and born, uniquely, rather than the old fashioned way. Therefore, Isaac's sacrifice, on the altar, represents the beauty of Israel, Israel's firstborn, being sacrificed on the altar, such that it's this sacrifice, of the beauty of Israel, the firstborn of Israel, that's passing through David's mind right after the sword passes through the Amalekite.

I understand where you are going with this, but Abraham was not supposed to kill Isaac. For how can death lead you to GOD?

God decreed Abraham to kill Isaac. God's decrees can't be rescinded. Abraham was supposed to kill Isaac. And since he didn't, Abraham is worthy of death. But God saved Abraham and Isaac by providing a surrogate for the one Abraham was unable to kill:

Neither Abraham nor Isaac are the primary focus of the Akedah: the Lamb of God is. Neither Moses nor the children of Israel are the primary focus of the Passover: the Lamb of God is. Neither Abraham, Isaac, nor Moses, are worthy of worship and or idolization. They failed. They we’re overpowered by the angel of death; recognized in a heretical first century tract as Samael, Lucifer, the angel of the Lord, the lawgiver, the god of this world, the ruler of the realm of death, the god of the natural-born offspring of Abraham (and natural born of everyone else), the angel known to be the devil to those supernaturally re-born through the blood of the Lamb of God seen and appreciated only by going all the way rather than worshiping under half-measures, half-cuttings, half-circumcision, half the scripture (Galatians 5:12).

The Binding Meaning [of] Isaac's Bondage.
​

​

John

 

[Yahcubs777]

God decreed Abraham to kill Isaac. God's decrees can't be rescinded. Abraham was supposed to kill Isaac. And since he didn't, Abraham is worthy of death. But God saved Abraham and Isaac by providing a surrogate for the one Abraham was unable to kill:

Neither Abraham nor Isaac are the primary focus of the Akedah: the Lamb of God is. Neither Moses nor the children of Israel are the primary focus of the Passover: the Lamb of God is. Neither Abraham, Isaac, nor Moses, are worthy of worship and or idolization. They failed. They we’re overpowered by the angel of death; recognized in a heretical first century tract as Samael, Lucifer, the angel of the Lord, the lawgiver, the god of this world, the ruler of the realm of death, the god of the natural-born offspring of Abraham (and natural born of everyone else), the angel known to be the devil to those supernaturally re-born through the blood of the Lamb of God seen and appreciated only by going all the way rather than worshiping under half-measures, half-cuttings, half-circumcision, half the scripture (Galatians 5:12).

The Binding Meaning [of] Isaac's Bondage.
​

​

John

GOD never said to kill Isaac. If HE said that, then why did HE stop Abraham? And again I ask you, how can Death lead you to GOD? The Lamb of GOD is Adam. And lucifer is a cherub not an angel.

 

[John D. Brey]

Abraham, contending for the convenant to be called "Father of many" was supposed to prove it by giving his Son Isaac, back to GOD alive.

Adam brought sin into the world when, in Genesis 2:21, he allowed the same hand, of the same angel whose hand stopped the hand of Abraham, to cut into his body and sew it up forming the flesh created in the image of that angel, the serpentine flesh the Roman church says is the deliver and delivery mechanism of death, original sin.

What Adam sinfully acquired, the phallus, Abraham ritually removed, brit milah, ritual emasculation, circumcision.

Abraham understood that since he was ritually emasculated prior to the conception and birth of Isaac, hell, Isaac's conception is founded on Abraham's ritual emasculation, therefore, Isaac, being born, ritually speaking, of a virgin, should be as Adam's firstborn would be had the Fall not occurred: free of the authority of the angel of death.

This idea ate at Abraham as Isaac was growing in the grace and knowledge of the Lord until one day Abraham's faith in the dictates of the foregoing caused him to prove his faith in the power of circumcision to free those born of a circumcised conception from the power of the angel of death.

So he brought Isaac to a hill to show that Isaac, as the first person born of an emasculated pregnancy, was thus not subject to the angel of death since the flesh created in the image of the angel of death didn't father him.

But the angel of death stops the hand of Abraham with the same hand that sewed up Adam after the manufacture of the flesh Abraham ritually removed such that Abraham's experiment failed. And for good reason, since Isaac later senescenced and died just like father Abraham.

And naturally so, since Abraham's emasculation was only ritual, as Isaac's virgin birth was only ritual, such that the lamb of God Abraham sacrificed rose, after Abraham and Isaac left for home, and lives to this very day as the surrogate for those whose allegedly great faith is only ritually great and not great through and through to the very blood and bone as was the lamb of God's.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

GOD never said to kill Isaac. If HE said that, then why did HE stop Abraham? And again I ask you, how can Death lead you to GOD? The Lamb of GOD is Adam. And lucifer is a cherub not an angel.

Abraham understood that God's decree to ritually emasculate himself was in order that all those born of the sin of Adam, i.e., allowing strange flesh to be created on his body in the image of the angel of death, the serpent, creating phallic-sex, and thus the sole means of giving birth, might be rescinded (Adam's error fixed), precisely when Abraham removed the flesh Adam added.

In this sense, the Akedah is the natural result of Abraham's circumcision. For Abraham, the Akedah is part and parcel of the decree to remove the fleshly angel of death co-habitating with him betwixt his legs.

Adam isn't the Lamb of God. The true firstborn of Adam, the second Adam, is.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

And again I ask you, how can Death lead you to GOD?

Ye must be born again. And Jesus is clear that unless he dies, no one can be reborn. His body is the veil blocking those who die, and salute him, from passing from this realm of death to the realm of everlasting life. That veil must be torn, and his body shorn, like a lamb, if anyone can be born again. Death, the death of the lamb of God, is the requirement for life eternal, so that the blood of the lamb is the elixir Ponce de Leon seemingly never found though it was right there in front of him in a chalice embossed with gold leaf on the edges.

Death is, blood, the death and blood of one person in all of humanity, required for life to escape the fangs of death. The blood of one man is poison for the serpent. A poison so fast-acting that if it's on you, in you, it will kill the serpent even before he sinks his teeth or sickle deep enough into you to harm you.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

Abraham, is also defining the GOD, who gave birth to the first born, Adam. Father Adam is the Son of GOD and and the Principal Ancestor of the Mankind Race.

Adam, like Eve, wasn't born. He was manufactured, like Eve, from adamah, earth. The true firstborn of God is not manufactured, but born. And the spade (which is used to manufacture from earth), the spade the ancients connected with the phallus, perhaps calling a spade a spade, so to say, is probably based on Genesis claiming Adam will till the adamah after the phallus is manufactured. The phallus is a manufacturing tool of the devil. It's the very tool through which he manufactured every one of us save the one who saved us, who, that one, was never manufactured. He was breathed into the female body of the first human, the adam, and then stillborn, until still, late, he was born of a virgin, after Adam and the serpent conspired to make, manufacture, a human civilization in their own image.

If you're conceived again, of blood rather than semen, then you are a new species conceived in Christ before the fall of the world and the rise of the flesh that adorns our animal nature.



John

 

[Yahcubs777]

Adam brought sin into the world when, in Genesis 2:21, he allowed the same hand, of the same angel whose hand stopped the hand of Abraham, to cut into his body and sew it up forming the flesh created in the image of that angel, the serpentine flesh the Roman church says is the deliver and delivery mechanism of death, original sin.

What Adam sinfully acquired, the phallus, Abraham ritually removed, brit milah, ritual emasculation, circumcision.

Abraham understood that since he was ritually emasculated prior to the conception and birth of Isaac, hell, Isaac's conception is founded on Abraham's ritual emasculation, therefore, Isaac, being born, ritually speaking, of a virgin, should be as Adam's firstborn would be had the Fall not occurred: free of the authority of the angel of death.

The idea ate at Abraham as Isaac was growing in the grace and knowledge of the Lord until one day Abraham's faith in the dictates of the foregoing caused him to prove his faith in the power of circumcision to free those born of a circumcised conception from the power of the angel of death.

So he brought Isaac to a hill to show that Isaac, as the first person born of an emasculated pregnancy, was thus not subject to the angel of death since the flesh created in the image of the angel of death didn't father him.

But the angel of death stops the hand of Abraham with the same hand that sewed up Adam after the manufacture of the flesh Abraham ritually removed such that Abraham's experiment failed. And for good reason, since Isaac later senescenced and died just like father Abraham.

And naturally so, since Abraham's emasculation was only ritual, as Isaac's virgin birth was only ritual, such that the lamb of God Abraham sacrificed rose, after Abraham and Isaac left for home, and lives to this very day as the surrogate for those whose allegedly great faith is only ritually great and not great through and through to the very blood and bone as was the lamb of God's.



John

John[/QUOTE]

GOD is not a ritualist.

This is where the church has lacked serious understanding in what sin is. Isaiah said our righteousness is like that of a filthy rag, pointed also to the leaf that can fade away. Because it's pointing to the mortal body that can fade away. Isaiah also said: Come let us reason together, though your sins be red as crimson, though they be scarlet, they shall be made white as snow? Why red? And why White? Because sin is actually the blood cell system. And the White, was pointing to the cell system of immortals which is Light. Sin is mortality. The body Father Adam and Mother Eve had before the fall was not mortal. The very systems of their body was not mortal. The cell system even of their body was not blood; blood cannot inherit the kingdom. When they ate a certain fruit, it set the alteration of their cell system in the negative, which took their body from celestial to terrestrial; from immortal to mortal. Mortality is the sin nature that everyone is born in, and it was required for procreation to be possible. And the cell system in the negative changed over time from Glory (Jordan) to water (Jericho), from water (Jericho) to wine (bethel) , and from wine (Bethel - Gilgal) to blood (Egypt).

And GOD sent us Prophets, and Angels of the Churches, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Joshua, Apostle Peter, and to come, the Son of Man Elijah, to lead the church back to heaven alive. And each Angel of the Church has his message that he preached concerning salvation and was contending for to inherit the earth.

Enoch preach the Gospel of transfiguration
Noah preached the Gospel of the washings of regeneration
Abraham preached the Gospel of Circumcision
Moses preached the Gospel of At-one-ment
Joshua preached the Gospel of Revelation
Apostle Peter preached the Gospel of the remission of sins.

The Son of man will preach the Gospel of immortality+ Incorruptibility.

Take all 7 of their messages together, and you can bring down the walls of jericho, which was typifying the walls of mortality, pointing to the rebirth of the physical body. And that is why they weren't supposed to push the walls down, but had to walk around them 1x a day for 7 days, and on the 7th day, 7x and shout HailElYah, and the walls came down. That 1x per day, is the message of each Angel of the Church for 7 days (which is what the feast of unleavened bread was pointing to), and then on the 7th Day, Elijah will revisit all of their messages, + his own, and restore all things. And then the walls of Mortality will come down.

GOD does not command anyone to die. GOD cannot kill or murder, for that is a result of the Sin nature; and its not something the Spirit can do. Just like the Spirit cannot age, the body can. So there is the Laws of the body, and the laws of the Spirit. Spirit Being cannot talk to Spirit Being audibly, which is why a mouthpiece is needed to vocalise what was said. This is a Law of the Spirit.

Father Adam and Mother Eve kept a Law also, and broke a law as well. The law they kept, is the Law of Procreation John 12:24, the Law they broke, is the Sacred law of Eternal life. And the only place where the Law was kept is in Noahs ARK.

Mortality is sin. Mortality is what needs to be shed, put off, and immortality needs to be put on, to be saved. That is what parting the red Sea that Moses did was pointing to; the shedding of blood in the body. Jacob means supplanter, and he was named that for a reason. For the cell system, the original gene of the Son of GOD hatched by assimilation of Revelations, meditating in them day and night, is what supplants the blood cell system, and crushes ageing, sickness and when it reaches her genome, it crushes death. At that point, you have brought down the walls of Jericho, and you are born again. Old things have passed away, and everything has become new. The systems of that body is all new. Then Crossing the River Jordan was pointing to draining the water in the body, so that your Spirit Being and body can become one. That is the wedding garment Jesus His Pre-Eminence spoke of. Then transfiguration happens.
No wonder Jesus His Pre-Eminence shared a parable and said a Man was robbed on his way to Jericho.

This is the path to life. The fact that there is the transfigured body, is proof that it is the original body of Man. We must transfigure in life, as Enoch and Elijah did, by the Revelations which washes us clean, which sanctifies us, which supplants the blood cell system, And circumcise ourselves from mortality, and then we have atoned for our sins, by Revelations that brought down the walls of Jericho. For without shedding of blood there can be no RE-MISSION ( pointing to the fact that its going back to the mission of sin) of sin. And that is when we have put off mortality, and put on immortality in life alive.

Abraham, being the 3rd Angel of the Church, was supposed to feed his son Revelations that he was getting from GOD. But he misunderstood the coded revelation: Living Sacrifice, so he interpreted what GOD was saying as give your son as a burnt offering. Abraham was receiving revelations about the constellation and stellar orders of the Mankind Race. He was receiving revelations about what it means to be an Abraham. And he was supposed feed his son Isaac with Revelations to supplant his sons blood cell system, and launch into jericho and then take him across the River Jordan, where a Chariot of Fire will pick him up. That is what Abraham was supposed to do.

 

[Yahcubs777]

Adam, like Eve, wasn't born. He was manufactured, like Eve, from adamah, earth. The true firstborn of God is not manufactured, but born. And the spade (which is used to manufacture from earth), the spade the ancients connected with the phallus, perhaps calling a spade a spade, so to say, is probably based on Genesis claiming Adam will till the adamah after the phallus is manufactured. The phallus is a manufacturing tool of the devil. It's the very tool through which he manufactured every one of us save the one who saved us, who, that one, was never manufactured. He was breathed into the female body of the first human, the adam, and then stillborn, until still, late, he was born of a virgin, after Adam and the serpent conspired to make, manufacture, a human civilization in their own image.

If you're conceived again, of blood rather than semen, then you are a new species conceived in Christ before the fall of the world and the rise of the flesh that adorns our animal nature.



John

No it isn't exactly true. What was written in genesis is just about the coupling of the body. But Man is a Spirit Being, he isn't the body. His Spirit Being was birthed by the Most Holy Spirit of GOD.

 

[John D. Brey]

And Father Adam His Eminence body was not made of dust like it was written. Moses, being the Law was not able to get to the height of the Prophet. So everything he said was literalised. But the Prophet, can reach that height of Revelation. Father Adam His Eminence body, was coupled by 12 Most precious Stones, which GOD took from HIS own substance, and baked them into 12 Most Precious Stones, and buried them in the earth before the fall in strategic places in the earth. And that is how the earth was baptized into them. Then HE took them out, and coupled the body of Father Adam with them, in HIS image,and after HIS likeness. Moses could only get to the height of, what moulded the body was taken from the ground. And that is why there is a Precious Stone for each tribe.

I like the spirit of this. It's a wonderful attempt to properly situate the first scripture, the Pentateuch and Tanakh, with the second, the Gospels and Apostolic writing.

The precious stone, the shetiya stone (foundation stone) is the stone all things are said to emanate from.

So it's utterly ironic, strange to our way of thinking, that the stone the builders, and the building, the manufactured ones, rejected, has been made the chief cornerstone through a birth not associated with the sin of the Fall, the manufacture of the flesh created in the image of the serpent, and all those manufactured thereon; on those testimonial stones, from those testes.

In other words, the shetiya stone, from which all things emanate, must be born to the mother that emanated from him. Which is part and parcel of the fact that the firstborn of creation, is the source of not only creation, but his own birth.

It's important that as your statement implies, correctly, Adam was designed to be the mother of the shetiya stone, not the father. Adam's body is feminine in that it was manufactured. Our bodies are feminine in that they were all manufactured by means of the spade Abraham's circumcision called a spade.

The only true male flesh is the flesh of the stone of foundation born of a virgin conception and pregnancy.



John