Is title of atheist a shame?

[questfortruth]

Is it appropriate to publish an article in a scientific journal where Hawking is said to be "the leading and outspoken atheist and Professor Dr. Hawking"? Or is the title of an atheist still a shameful thing?


Please read more in:
Proof of Omniscient Being | Religious Forums

Is it good:

You might say: ``To know everything that means spanning infinity, so,
it would be impossible for such a being to exist.''
No, it is possible, because you are not sure.
If you are perfectly sure, only then it is impossible in your opinion.
Learn the depths inside your own mind.
The outspoken researcher Dr.~Richard Dawkins [the author of ``God's delusion'']
was not sure in Ben Stein's scandal documentary ``Expelled''.

there is NO evidence.

Evidence is different from proof.
Evidence for X just says in favor of X.
The proof for X says beyond reasonable doubt that X holds.

Therefore, the existence of theists, [especially of theistic scientists, physicists], tells in favor of the Existing God, not in favor of nonexisting god. So, the existence of theists is evidence for theism.
If there were only atheists and no single theist in all history of the world, then that is STRONG PROOF of Atheism.

 

[Daemon Sophic]

Is it appropriate to publish an article in a scientific journal where Hawking is said to be "the leading atheist and Professor Dr. Hawking"? Or is the title of an atheist still a shameful thing?


Please read more in:
Proof of Omniscient Being | Religious Forums

He is not “the leading atheist and Professor Dr. Hawking”.
He is “an outspoken atheist, and Professor Dr. Hawking”.

Thankfully, for all of humanity and the world, it is not a shame (or a ‘sin’, or any kind of childish insult) to be called an atheist.

 

[questfortruth]

Thankfully, for all of humanity and the world, it is not a shame (or a ‘sin’, or any kind of childish insult) to be called an atheist.

But to be called "atheist" in the top journal of Physics? Is it shame?

 

[SalixIncendium]

No.

Sorry for the long-winded response.

 

[Spirit of Light]

But to be called "atheist" in the top journal of Physics? Is it shame?

Why would it be a shame? If Hawing was an Atheist i do not see why he would feel shame about it?

 

[questfortruth]

He is not “the leading atheist and Professor Dr. Hawking”.
He is “an outspoken atheist, and Professor Dr. Hawking”.

Is it good:

The leading and outspoken Atheist Dr. Richard Dawkins is not sure:
Ben Stein's scandal documentary ``Expelled''.

 

[questfortruth]

Why would it be a shame? If Hawing was an Atheist i do not see why he would feel shame about it?

I am writing a perfect paper for Science of Physics, would it be very good to say "atheist Hawking" there?

 

[RabbiO]

No.

Sorry for the long-winded response.

Do I award the winner symbol for part one of your response or do I award the funny one for the second part?

Decisions, decisions.

 

[Spirit of Light]

I am writing a perfect paper for Science of Physics, would it be very good to say "atheist Hawking" there?

Just say"Steven Hawing", no need to say religious or atheist Hawing....or?

 

[questfortruth]

Just say"Steven Hawing", no need to say religious or atheist Hawing....or?

But is it shame, is it assault? I do not want the paper to be rejected! Is it a compliment to the mind-power of Hawking?

 

[PureX]

It's basically just self-centered foolishness on the part of the author (and the editors of journal), it's not shame.

 

[Spirit of Light]

But is it shame, is it assault? I do not want the paper to be rejected! Is it a compliment to the mind-power of Hawking?

Is it a shame or attack to write his name? No of course not.

Do you have to use the term Atheist in your paper?

 

[Daemon Sophic]

But to be called "atheist" in the top journal of Physics? Is it shame?

There would be no good reason at all in any physics journal to name or discuss the belief system/religion/philosophy of a person you are citing. Physics is not concerned with that.

Also, when naming other scientists who are not atheists, do you say “a known Christian Professor Dr. Common”, or “leading Buddhist Professor Dr. Jadhai”, etc….?
Of course you wouldn’t. Not if you expect to be taken seriously.

 

[RabbiO]

I am writing a perfect paper for Science of Physics, would it be very good to say "atheist Hawking" there?

You shouldn’t worry. Based on your track record whatever paper you write will be far from perfect in any sense of the word and it will never see the light of day in any reputable scientific journal.

 

[Revoltingest]

Or is the title of an atheist still a shameful thing?

I feel no shame whatsoever.

 

[Altfish]

But to be called "atheist" in the top journal of Physics? Is it shame?

No it is not.
But to be called a Scientologist would be a shame

 

[questfortruth]

it will never see the light of day in any reputable scientific journal

I disagree, truth will win.

 

[questfortruth]

There would be no good reason at all in any physics journal to name or discuss the belief system/religion/philosophy of a person you are citing. Physics is not concerned with that.

Also, when naming other scientists who are not atheists, do you say “a known Christian Professor Dr. Common”, or “leading Buddhist Professor Dr. Jadhai”, etc….?
Of course you wouldn’t. Not if you expect to be taken seriously.

Is it good:

You might say: ``To know everything that means spanning infinity, so,
it would be impossible for such a being to exist.''
No, it is possible, because you are not sure.
If you are perfectly sure, only then it is impossible in your opinion.
Learn the depths inside your own mind.
The outspoken researcher Dr. Richard Dawkins [the author of ``God's delusion'']
was not sure in Ben Stein's scandal documentary ``Expelled''.

 

[Spirit of Light]

I disagree, truth will win.

How many papers have you gotten published in Scientific magazines or Journals? in total I mean.

 

[ChristineM]

But to be called "atheist" in the top journal of Physics? Is it shame?

No it isn't, abusing atheiem is a shame though