There can be structure and function without a designer. That is common sense.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is Theory of Evolution absurdic?
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
There can be structure and function without a designer. That is common sense.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
You think not having common sense is a compliment?
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
No, that's nonsense.
I can't find anything that exists that has function but no creator.
Even the simplest machine you can imagine doesn't invent itself.
Of course what we actually have in DNA is infinity more complex. To believe it happened by accident is laughable.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It depends upon how the one that uses the phrase employs it. For example, a person could say "It is common sense that 2 + 2 = 5". If that person said that I did not have common sense I would thank him or her.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nice, now you are comparing manufactured objects to those that are not manufactured. Please tell me that I do not have common sense.
And those that do not understand science are the only ones that try to claim that evolution is random.
Tiberius
Well-Known Member
So, you've got the argument from incredulity.
A rose and a flea are related, but you have to go back to a time when life was not like either of them. A simplistic explanation would be that life was like one celled organisms, and some of those evolved to become fleas, and others became roses.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
You are made up of millions of machines.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No. At least not in the sense that you have used the word. They are similar to machines.
Perhaps you might want to learn what is and what is not evidence in the sciences? There is no reason that creationists cannot pursue evidence, if they really believe what they claim to believe.
EDIT: Why did you use an optimistic fruble on @Tiberius 's post? Were you optimistic that you would understand this? He was not being optimistic. What he posted is a known fact.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
Yes... you are literally made up of gene machines.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, we are not. Very similar to machines, but not machines. You are trying to use semantics as a source of evidence. You can only fool creationists with that poor logic.
You see you are trying to use the fact that human made genes are manufactured to get in your "designed claim". That is not allowed in the sciences. You can't be sneaky and think that you will not be laughed at.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Enjoy your bliss, because your beliefs are not consistent with facts, science, and reason. You make many posts and claims that are simply wrong according to facts and science. You refuse to accept what science reports. Not much common sense in that.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
How dare you insult God's high scientist! (cf. Acts 23:4).
I am the first author of the brilliant ``Evaluation of the Gauss integral'', arXiv:2202.12394 [math.NA].
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
arXiv is not a peer reviewed source. An article in it is all but meaningless. By the way, if you had done what you claimed, some mathematician would have picked up on it by now.
Hey, it's OK because I'm not convinced any Gods exist. And you have contempt for science, so we both win.
Was the second author the one that corrected all your errors?
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
I am perfect genius, but a loser. "the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, living in caves and in holes in the ground." Hebrews 11:38
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
A looser? Who did you free?
What's a looser? Someone that reduces the tightness of things?
PruePhillip
Well-Known Member
You have about 80% of the genes of a daffodil. How can that be true?
Can't you believe that 'God commanded the sea to bring forth life' ????