paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Is Secularism and secular form of government, one and the same, please?
Regards
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
According to my understanding secularism is a label for belief in the value of secular government, so no they are not the same
''One manifestation of secularism is asserting the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, or, in a state declared to be neutral on matters of belief, from the imposition by government of religion or religious practices upon its people.'' Wiki
In a secular state, the government cannot impose religious practices including religious law like Sharia or even a religion itself, on the people.
So a government that seeks a religious mandate for the state and it's people, is not compatible with secularism.
Secularism is the total separation of church and state, essential for freedom democracy and equality, the basic tenet of all free nations.
well stop it, it has to learn on it's own.It's my nurturing nature...
Muh babies...well stop it, it has to learn on it's own.
Don't know about secularism.Is Secularism and secular form of government, one and the same, please?
Regards
The words "right to be free from" also infer that people can willingly forgo that right.''One manifestation of secularism is asserting the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, or, in a state declared to be neutral on matters of belief, from the imposition by government of religion or religious practices upon its people.'' Wiki
In a secular state, the government cannot impose religious practices including religious law like Sharia or even a religion itself, on the people.
So a government that seeks a religious mandate for the state and it's people, is not compatible with secularism.
Secularism is the total separation of church and state, essential for freedom democracy and equality, the basic tenet of all free nations.
The words "right to be free from" also infer that people can willingly forgo that right.
I don't know about the former. But I agree with the latter part of your answer. But I would add that, in Islam, those laws that Muslims choose to adopt must not be forced upon non-Muslims as well. Because that, then, goes against secularism.That would be entirely unwise. To vote in a theocratic government and end secularism. Theocratic nations along with absolute monarchies, fascist and communist nations, have very poor human rights track records.
It matters not as far as definition goes if people approve of certain religious practices or press their governments by popular mandate to make laws that enshrine in legislation, religious laws. That indeed does not mean the nation isnt secular. So long as the government is and remains neutral. Does not impose religious values/laws, on it's people.
Islamic government: one in which Islamic instructions related to legislation are adopted voluntarily without any coercion by a Muslim majority; And where legislation pertaining to non-Muslims are agreed upon and kept less strict than the laws for Muslims.I guess it all depends on what you mean exactly by 'Islamic Government'. KT.
Islamic government: one in which Islamic instructions related to legislation are adopted voluntarily without any coercion by a Muslim majority; And where legislation pertaining to non-Muslims are agreed upon and kept less strict than the laws for Muslims.
Every community must, however, be covered by some treaty that is at the least secular in nature ... at the least.
This, in my opinion, is precisely how the Islamic government in Medina was governed by the Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw).
Secular means just or fair in my opinion. This should be the bare minimum standard for any government as well as an Islamic government.Does the word "secular*" mean worldly, please?
Regards
_____________
*secular (adj.)
c. 1300, "living in the world, not belonging to a religious order," also "belonging to the state," from Old French seculer (Modern French séculier), from Late Latin saecularis "worldly, secular, pertaining to a generation or age," from Latin saecularis "of an age, occurring once in an age," from saeculum "age, span of time, lifetime, generation, breed."
This is from Proto-Italic *sai-tlo-, which, according to Watkins, is PIE instrumental element *-tlo- + *sai- "to bind, tie" (see sinew), extended metaphorically to successive human generations as links in the chain of life. De Vaan lists as a cognate Welsh hoedl "lifespan, age." An older theory connected it to words for "seed," from PIE root *se- "to sow" (see sow (v.), and compare Gothic mana-seþs "mankind, world," literally "seed of men").
Used in ecclesiastical writing like Greek aion "of this world" (see cosmos). It is source of French siècle. Ancient Roman ludi saeculares was a three-day, day-and-night celebration coming once in an "age" (120 years). In English, in reference to humanism and the exclusion of belief in God from matters of ethics and morality, from 1850s.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/secular
...no.Is Secularism and secular form of government, one and the same, please?
Regards
...no.
Next?
I'm really not sure where your confusion lies, could you be more specific?paarsurrey said: ↑
Is Secularism and secular form of government, one and the same, please?
Regards
How would one define them, please?
Regards
I'm really not sure where your confusion lies, could you be more specific?
I don't know about the former. But I agree with the latter part of your answer. But I would add that, in Islam, those laws that Muslims choose to adopt must not be forced upon non-Muslims as well. Because that, then, goes against secularism.