MyM
Well-Known Member
I like your analogy; it gets to the heart of the matter. It is a no win contest. I have religious ideas from revelations, others may agree or not, but, when my ideas conflict, I have little or no defense. In particular, my idea of God's duality isn't found in religious literature. I have an argument for God's duality, but it can be disputed, as shown. Yes, the idea of one God is far more appealing, but it may not be correct. I claim there is one God, but its split into two parts. In heaven there are two Gods in a sphere. No matter how you spin it, it is difficult to comprehend. Human logic shouldn't be a prerequisite for understanding God. Why would the creator of everything be subject to human understanding?
man thinks they know more than God and interpret God to their own limited understanding.