Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
JUst to clarify. This was not an insult. I was obviously joking. I think very highly of the person I was speaking to. Some people don't know that, so thought I'd make it clear.
Maybe he is rehabilitating and evolving though?If that deity you mentioned promotes and condones mass murder then Hell Ain't A Bad Place To Be.
PS
I wouldn't be using the words sinful or depravity though.
Is that a contraction of "women is"?
Shhhhhhh!Picky poopy head
Picky poopy head
Shhhhhhh!
I was making a funny based upon the
ambiguity of possessives vs contractions.
We are evolved to eat a wide variety of foods, including meat, as can be discerned from out dentition and our digestive system.
If it were really immoral to eat meat, why would we permit carnivores to live, and eat the meat we think should be saved? There is such a thing as a natural world.
Awww...Don't worry yourself, if i thought it was anything other than fun i wouldn't have replied to it.
That is a better reaction than I'd hoped for.Well just stop it, you are being a very naughty boy
That's the spirit! You go girl!Well just stop it, you are being a very naughty boy
So, you don't think of intelligence as being any sort of evolutionary advantage then.....interesting.If humans were meant to eat meat, it would be what a human could naturally take down. We don't have the claws, teeth, or muscle mass to take down a cow or pig. If we were meant to eat meat, it would probably be vermin...
Being cruel to animals is forbidden in Islam.
Perhaps you don't see humans as animals -- and omnivores?What is the connection? What has the ethics of humans eating or not eating meat got to do with the natural behaviour of carnivores? Nothing.
I think we have a different interpretation of cruelty, i believe that leaving an animal alive while it is bleeding to death its veins, arteries, the associated nerves and surrounding tissue are severed in my opinion is cruel. Far better for the animal to humainly put it out of its misery before it can suffer the pains of mutilation.
The fastest way to kill an animal is to get the jugular. It is the safest way to let the blood drain out since we are not to eat the blood. It doesn't take that long before it is dead. But to kill it and then the blood stays is not the way for a clean slaughter. The nerves that move doesn't necessarily mean it is alive.
Ever see how animals kill animals? Lion gets the wildebeest how? The tigers kill how? They all grab the jugular veins. This is how to slaughter. They even know how to kill.
It takes long enough that it feels pain and yes, research shows that the animal being slaughtered while still conscious does feel pain
For your enjoyment
Animals feel the pain of religious slaughter | New Scientist
Stunning alleviates the pain?....what about the pain of the stun
In Islam, a painful blow is not merciful neither is letting other animals see or hear.
Any animal that is alive will feel the pain of death sure, but we are to minimalize it to the least and the best way. No blood is to be left to eat and shooting, hitting, stunning, etc. all hurt the animal and may even cause it to be brain dead and that is not mercy at all.