questfortruth
Well-Known Member
I am using it as analogy to my situation. Stats is a secret place.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is Darwinism useful?
- Thread starter questfortruth
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So not a real peer reviewed journal. Just a predatory publisher.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
It is so strong and perfect peer-review journal that it is not listed in Google. The place for genius works.
Bring listed in Google does not make a peer-reviewed journal reputable and reliable, It is the recognition of the scientists of the world ,universities, scientists and other scientific societies. The better journals of the world have a long history of reputable and reliable publishing.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
The Stats has such qualities, please read about it on their web-site.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, it is a place where sheep are shorn.
One does not play hide and seek while trying to do science.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
If you want, I can create a web page which says right there on the web page that it is the most perfect web page in existence.
Apparently, that impresses you.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Because you want to claim to have published a peer reviewed article, but that claim fails when we examine the publisher that you used.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Even the Sun has black spots. Look for positive aspect of my publication. It is really peer-reviewed. There was intense correspondence between us (me and Dr. Groote) and the three critically minded referees.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Perhaps they work a bit harder to maintain the illusion, but why can't the source be found? It may be a new and struggling predatory journal.
You never answered why you did not submit it to a well respected professional journal. Besides that what does that article have to do with this thread?
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
I was kicked off. It is not me to blame, please.
I have shown that I am not crazy.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
If you think that falling for a predatory journal proves that you are not crazy you are mistaken. I am not claiming that you are crazy, but I have not seen any evidence to the contrary.
But if you were "kicked off" from well respected journals that should tell you something.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
It is not me to blame, please. Blame a devil or bad luck or something. But not blame me, please.
So what?!?!?! Everything has quantities. Not the subject of the thread.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
To those who reject me, I will answer with the
words of the great visionary Nikola Tesla [strengthened by me]:
``You can steal the Present from me, but the Future is mine''.
This Rhyme resonates with me: ``you are amusing to Me; you are
the Mystery.'' (Madonna, Like a Prayer) Like the Father sings about my way
of doing mathematics and science. But this
Rhyme of the Celtic Woman song ``T\'ir N\'a N\'og'' predicts the unfair
total rejection: ``The world you left, it forgot your name''.
No intent tp harm, but nonetheless . . .
Everything has quantities. Not the subject of the thread.
questfortruth
Well-Known Member
Nonsensical.
Clear and plain English. What is the subject of the thread?