sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Of course Moses was a mystic. He had direct experience of the Divine. That’s the definition of a mystic.And was Moses also a mystic applying ones incorrect yardstick?
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course Moses was a mystic. He had direct experience of the Divine. That’s the definition of a mystic.And was Moses also a mystic applying ones incorrect yardstick?
Regards
You don’t interpret the Bible that way. But it’s there. Of course mysticism has its roots in paganism. Paganism is older than Judaism.No there is no a single scripture in all the bible that teaches mysticism which has it's origin in pagan teachings and the occult. It is not biblical. You have to go outside of the bible to learn about mysticism. This alone should tell you not to go there
Not always, and not necessarily. Mysticism is a much broader umbrella term than you realize. In Christian mysticism, contemplation leads to greater attention and awareness."Mysticism is the practice of religious ecstasies, together with whatever ideologies, ethics, rites, myths, legends, and magic may be related to them
The article speaks in very general terms, and does not describe Christian mysticism. Did you miss the definition I provided? It comes from a much more reliable source than Wikipedia.
Again, contemplation and some forms of meditation focus the awareness, and bring knowledge. Does the Psalmist not say that he will meditate on God’s precepts daily? It is biblical.As posted earlier it has its origins from the occult and is not biblical. The difference is that the occult knows what it is doing and retains knowledge and consciensness and mysticism does not
It’s origins are not biblical, but then, the origins of much of the OT stories are pagan.This is not biblical and does not have it's origin in the scriptures or the teachings of JESUS and the bible
“As defined” is an incorrect definition.None of what you have listed above is mysticism as defined earlier
Christian mysticism doesn’t utilize either one.Leviticus 20:6 “If a person turns to mediums and necromancers, whoring after them, I will set my face against that person and will cut him off from among his people
It was also practiced in OT Judaism.Nonsense. Mysticism predates Christianity and was practiced in the old testament occult and pagan religions as shown in the scriptures already provided above
Everything has its roots in Shamanism. Shamanism is the earliest known religious practice.Mysticism has roots in Shamanism
You write it from a position of ignorance and fear.Goodness I write this with all love and genuine concern
What in the world does the Rosary have to do with mysticism? The definitions provided are the wrong definitions.Really? Never practiced Rosary beads in the Catholic Church? Read the definitions already provided above your post
You’ve splattered the forum with meaningless misunderstanding, using incorrect definitions that don’t define what you think they define.. I have discussed it in detail here
Isn’t that what the Serpent said to Eve? Just sayin’...Trust me
What you’ve demonstrated is your complete lack of understanding.I have already demonstrated this through the scriptures and outside of the scriptures quoting many difference sources
Whatever the definitions later people make, Moses never made any claim to mysticism. Did Moses, please?Of course Moses was a mystic. He had direct experience of the Divine. That’s the definition of a mystic.
You haven’t considered anything we’ve written. It’s like you’re sticking your fingers in your ears going LALALALALA I’M NOT LISTENING!!!!!!Look all your post shows is that you have not read anything that has posted to you
Isn’t that what you’ve done?You and your friends have not adressed any of the content in the posts provided to you except to deny and ignore it
Translation: “I’ve lost the argument; I’m taking my marbles and going home.Go off and practice your magic if you want to
Apparently, you can’t prove that it’s not biblical.. You cannot prove mysticism through the bible and the scriptures as it is not biblical
This, right here, is the only thing you’ve posted that’s not nonsense. ALL of what you posted is your opinion — and it is skewed.
Joshua 1:8, Psalm 119:78 among others.Nonsense. Please demonstrate this from the scriptures
Most mystics don’t use that nomenclature. But that doesn’t mean they’re not mystics.Whatever the definitions later people make, Moses never made any claim to mysticism. Did Moses, please?
Regards
If they didn't claimed to be one, why fit them into mysticism, please?Most mystics don’t use that nomenclature for themselves. The fact is that all three are depicted as having mystic experiences.
Christian mysticism is a set of prayer forms. Are you asserting that there’s nothing about prayer in the Bible?Actually I believe it means if the word of God condemns the things we do many will not come to the Word of God because men love to be in darkness rather then receive the correction of the scriptures or what God's Word condemns. If your thread here is promoting occult teachings why why try and teach things that are clearly not biblical?
Heroes generally don’t claim to be heroes. Shall we not fit them into that role if they fit the definition?If they didn't claimed to be one, why fit them into mysticism, please?
Regards
Better scrape the scales from your eyes and take your fingers out of your ears then.He is calling all who have ears to hear and eyes to see. These are they that are blind and deaf
They (Moses, Jesus, Muhammad) were people who were engaged with the life fully and they shaped human history, please.Hero’s generally don’t claim to be heroes. Shall we not fit them into that role if they fit the definition?
You certainly haven’t shown that here. He has answered you; you’re not paying attention.Actually I believe I know more than you think. That is why you cannot respond to my questions I ask you.
That’s what mysticism does: engages us fully in life.They (Moses, Jesus, Muhammad) were people who were engaged with the life fully and they shaped human history, please.
Regards
I disagree. In fact, biblical scholarship shows us that the texts have changed very little. The phenomenon of different views is due to the nature of the texts themselves. The Bible has endured, not because it is true, but because it is multivalent.Sorry to say this but i don't see it as proof in the way you hoped. Do you know the real reason why there is so many different views of Christianity and Catholicism? Because man has changed the word that was there originally, So did the protestants in the time of Martin Luther too. So the teachings in the bible has been altered by man, and this confuses them until the teaching is no longer recognizable the way it was originally thought. So No i do not get surprised when i see so much difference even within the same church.
And other problem is that when the scripture is changed the truth of it falls away, because humans can not see the teaching they took away was very important from the beginning. If i am not mistaken it even says in the Bible. Do not remove or change a word of the holy bible. Because if the teaching is true, those words was true word from a God. And Gods do see the truth clear whereas human see truth though muddy glasses until they enlighten to the truth that was originally thought to the first disiples
One word that get changed is enough to make it more or less impossible to gain the result spiritual practice is all about. And there has been many people trying to interpret the bible and got it wrong. And in the later days now when clear guidance has been changed because followers disagree with what is written, They think something is unfair to them when it is a "rule" or guideline that go against what they want. Spiritual practice is not about what we want, but what is the truth, and until man understand the truth they will walk in the darkness.I disagree. In fact, biblical scholarship shows us that the texts have changed very little. The phenomenon of different views is due to the nature of the texts themselves. The Bible has endured, not because it is true, but because it is multivalent.
. Spiritual practice is not about what we want, but what is the truth, and until man understand the truth they will walk in the darkness.
That’s what mysticism does: engages us fully in life.
I believe the God's Word and it says that all scripture is given by inspiration of God and only God's Word is true and we should believe and follow it over the teachings and traditions of men that break the commandments of God. The only critical error IMO is someone that does not believe and follow God's Word as it is only in God's Word that any or us have God's salvation. You neglect God's Word I believe you are neglecting your own faith and salvation.
You’re missing the point. “The truth” isn’t found in exact wording. Much of truth isn’t even found in language. The truth is found in what we bring to the texts — not in what we get out of the texts. The texts are largely inspirational and not instructional. Yes, there are many people who get interpretation wrong, but it’s because of what they bring to the texts: eisegesis and proof-texting, rather than exegesis and critical disciplines.One word that get changed is enough to make it more or less impossible to gain the result spiritual practice is all about. And there has been many people trying to interpret the bible and got it wrong. And in the later days now when clear guidance has been changed because followers disagree with what is written, They think something is unfair to them when it is a "rule" or guideline that go against what they want. Spiritual practice is not about what we want, but what is the truth, and until man understand the truth they will walk in the darkness.