• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is beauty real?

PureX

Veteran Member
But one definition of ideal states that ideal means "existing only in the imagination; desirable or perfect but not likely to become a reality." How can reality be imagined or made up? That seems paradoxical to me. Reality can't be real if it's imagined since it can be whatever anyone wants it to be and therefore not objective.
The only 'reality' we have is the one we carry in our minds as a result of our limited experience and understanding of 'what is'.

The truth is 'what is'. Reality is what we think 'is', is.


Unfortunately, we humans are so accustomed to just blindly presuming that what we think is real, is 'what is' real, that we don't even have two different terms for designating the difference. We call them both "reality" when in fact one is what we think reality is, and the other is 'what is' regardless of what we think.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Has anyone ever considered that DNA, the building blocks of life, are symmetrical and beautiful?

7d99ef8d6df95d2ebf0edca459000f03.jpg
 

The Reverend Bob

Fart Machine and Beastmaster
The only 'reality' we have is the one we carry in our minds as a result of our limited experience and understanding of 'what is'.

The truth is 'what is'. Reality is what we think 'is', is.


Unfortunately, we humans are so accustomed to just blindly presuming that what we think is real, is 'what is' real, that we don't even have two different terms for designating the difference. We call them both "reality" when in fact one is what we think reality is, and the other is 'what is' regardless of what we think.
We mistake the map for the territory
 

Jos

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, we humans are so accustomed to just blindly presuming that what we think is real, is 'what is' real, that we don't even have two different terms for designating the difference. We call them both "reality" when in fact one is what we think reality is, and the other is 'what is' regardless of what we think.
But isn't reality defined as that which is real? Isn't truth defined as that which comports with reality? So how can reality be subjective but truth objective if they're basically the same thing?
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
The only 'reality' we have is the one we carry in our minds as a result of our limited experience and understanding of 'what is'.

The truth is 'what is'. Reality is what we think 'is', is.


Unfortunately, we humans are so accustomed to just blindly presuming that what we think is real, is 'what is' real, that we don't even have two different terms for designating the difference. We call them both "reality" when in fact one is what we think reality is, and the other is 'what is' regardless of what we think.

This also, is a reductionist bias. The human mind, IMO, is like the diamond of life. Here being animated stardust, we can begin with ourselves to unlock the mysteries of the universe... And we see beauty.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
They don't do beautiful things, we see them as beautiful

But as the most advanced lifeforms, and being made up entirely of stardust and animated and with a conciousness, why would our interpretation of beauty be not real?

...We are pretty legit beings, afterall. The product of Billions and Billions of years of evolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jos

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So true. For example: my wife thinks running horses are beautiful; I just see them as a waste of a good pair of boots.
She also thinks she has a great guy we all know thats total BSM. which brings me Back to john prine inspite of ourselves!
 

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
That's called reductionism, which is harmful to human growth.
Its also mentally unhealthy for some. The mentally ill all spin into a kind of reductive reality of self reference. It happened to nietchze but it happens in all arenas of human thought. Its normal.
 

Jos

Well-Known Member
Correct. Belief is delusional. As well as non belief and agnosticism.
That doesn't make sense. How can belief and non belief both be delusional? And if they're both delusional then what are the other non delusional options, if there are any?
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
That doesn't make sense. How can belief and non belief both be delusional? And if they're both delusional then what are the other non delusional options, if there are any?

I agree that our common interpretations and thoughts should not be so readily dismissed as "delusional".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jos
Top