Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The indirect effects have a considerably greater body count.Per year? If so, that seems low.
Let me try again:
@julianalexander745, what scientific bodies would you hold to be most credible on the issue?
The world's smallest violin is playing.
Don't act like I'm dodging.
Any ethical scientist working in a scientific institution would suffice.
Nice try.
And you still fail to answer the question. I'm sorry, but you really aren't very god at this.
If you were an outdoor person who is mindful, you should have been able to tell the difference in weather, fauna and flora which has been occurring over the last 10 years or so. A very noticeable increase in wind days, stronger fall and spring storms, very noticeable decrease the amount of wild animals, birds and insects in your own backyard.I can remember being a young boy in primary school learning, in great scientific detail, about what climate change is, why it is happening and the role that human beings play in causing it.
This was something like circa 1998.
Since then, there have been modest yet genuine attempts to rectify the issue through carbon emissions schemes, changes to the materials corporations use, et al. It's modest, but progress has been made.
On the other hand, apocalyptic visions for the outcome of our impact of the world and a complete exaggeration of how we are all in imminent danger seems to have exploded into the forefront of the international media this year.
Personally, I think the biggest problem humans face today is that too many people in the West get off on being outraged.
I may not be god, but I am intelligent enough to know that a persistent insistence that a person is failing to answer a question is not sufficient enough to discredit them.
Try again.
I may not be god, but I am intelligent enough ...
At issue here is whether you are intelligent enough and honest enough to answer the question.
It's dangerous propaganda designed to get people to support certain political positions without thinking to hard about it and while ignoring their conscience. After all ... "to save the planet" everything is expedient.I can remember being a young boy in primary school learning, in great scientific detail, about what climate change is, why it is happening and the role that human beings play in causing it.
This was something like circa 1998.
Since then, there have been modest yet genuine attempts to rectify the issue through carbon emissions schemes, changes to the materials corporations use, et al. It's modest, but progress has been made.
On the other hand, apocalyptic visions for the outcome of our impact of the world and a complete exaggeration of how we are all in imminent danger seems to have exploded into the forefront of the international media this year.
Personally, I think the biggest problem humans face today is that too many people in the West get off on being outraged.
Lol and what "question" is that?
Personally, I think the biggest problem humans face today is that too many people in the West get off on being outraged.
As you wish. I'm done with you.
Darn you must live a very sheltered life.
That their power and wealth came through their manipulation of the status quo. That there is great profit in maintaining the current political and business models. That any changes that would negatively affect stock prices or their re-elections.And what do they all agree on?