Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Because there are more red states than blue states?I wasn’t aware of that. Why?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because there are more red states than blue states?I wasn’t aware of that. Why?
You know that Democrats will never ever help those people and eliminate the problem. Ever.Thanks for your perspective. Yes, there was focus on California. There’s plenty of money in California, too, which could be used by those to practice what they say they believe about equality. There are so many homeless and poverty stricken people in California now.
I grew up in single family housing in Virginia. There's nothing as great as a home like that, unless you have a bigger one. There is always the risk that the price could drop beneath the debt invested in the house. That creates a real fear that you will be unable to afford the house that you live in. I suspect that fear is tripled in California where everybody knows that the prices are ridiculous. There must be a constant gnawing knowledge that your house is overpriced, a sort of imposter syndrome.That change was part of a suite of housing production bills Newsom signed into law on Thursday, continuing a years-long trend of California pushing forward as one of the few states attempting to tackle the housing supply crisis.
“What do Democrats actually do when they have all the power?
But Jesus should be against those things, no?Lets see, to mention but a few; Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, guaranteed health care, end forced segregation, Affirmative Action, SNAP.
But Jesus should be against those things, no?
Some of those aren't subject to state control, eg, Social Security.Lets see, to mention but a few; Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, guaranteed health care, end forced segregation, Affirmative Action, SNAP.
There must be a constant gnawing knowledge that your house is overpriced, a sort of imposter syndrome.
So, you ask a question and then answer it in the same post?Are Democrats or Republicans fueling inequality?
“What do Democrats actually do when they have all the power?" Times video journalist Johnny Harris asked at the outset of an opinion video posted by the paper last week.
Harris teamed up with Times editorial board writer Binyamin Appelbaum to examine why famously liberal states — such as New York, California, and Washington — struggle to advance the progressive policies despite little to no Republican opposition.
They focused on three core initiatives of the Democratic Party platform: affordable housing, economic equality, and educational opportunity. And in the end, they discovered that "liberal hypocrisy," not Republican opposition, "is fueling American inequality" and that things are actually much worse in blue states than they are in red.”
NY Times journalists explore what happens when Democrats have all the power, find out 'blue states are the problem'
That is definitely an issue. In the Central Valley people keep fighting it. We need more housing, but people are against it. (This is also Red California).Last week I watched most of that video. Most of it was about California. The trouble in California was that homeowners kept voting for resolutions which undermined attempts to allow for more home building. He pointed out that this seemed hypocritical since California was a heavily democrat state.
I'd say it was inconclusive about which politicians were more hypocritical, however as a wake up call to Californians I'd say it was important journalism.
That is definitely an issue. In the Central Valley people keep fighting it. We need more housing, but people are against it. (This is also Red California).
I think you’re correct. There are only a very few decent and caring voices amongst ether the Dems or Reps.Both are. Neither has any unifying qualities whatsoever for the common good of everyone.
Why are you taking about the former president?So, you ask a question and then answer it in the same post?
Secondly, I think any objective person is well aware of who's really spouting the most hypocrisy, and that's the party that has overwhelmingly supported the attempt by a former president to overturn an election.
Thirdly, that same former president in no way reflects even the most basic Judeo-Christian teachings, thus it begs the question why any professed Christian would at this time support him? Since when is materialism, hedonism, mysogyny, racism, and blatant dishonesty for starters reflect Christian values?
Category error.Are Democrats or Republicans fueling inequality?
What's the common good of everyone?Both are. Neither has any unifying qualities whatsoever for the common good of everyone.
Because the main opposition to the "left" is the blind following of the "right" under Trump. OTOH, I have no problem whatsoever with those whom are independents, but your posts do not reflect that position.Why are you taking about the former president?
I wasn’t aware of that. Why?
More importantly, the overwhelming majority of "red" states in the US consist of sparsely populated rural areas with underfunded infrastructure and massive unemployment.Because there are more red states than blue states?
Actually most red states have ample employment and a reasonable infrastructure.More importantly, the overwhelming majority of "red" states in the US consist of sparsely populated rural areas with underfunded infrastructure and massive unemployment.
Sure, if that's what you want to believe.Actually most red states have ample employment and a reasonable infrastructure.