Aupmanyav
Be your own guru
Perhaps the Indians were closest to it with Maya and Impermance.Meanwhile, fundamental underlying reality remains as deeply hidden as it ever did.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps the Indians were closest to it with Maya and Impermance.Meanwhile, fundamental underlying reality remains as deeply hidden as it ever did.
Simulation hypothesis confirmed.Perhaps the Indians were closest to it with Maya and Impermance.
Not that I did dismiss as superstition in
the way you suggest, or that, you idea is more than half baked.
Still, I think there's much to it that is worth
working through, so I will rate your dismissal
as comparably half baked
It is not orchestrated by any God. It is nature of things.Simulation hypothesis confirmed.
Or maybe they were the farthest from it with Maya.Perhaps the Indians were closest to it with Maya and Impermance.
Science has not reached any conclusion on the matter.What does science say?
What does science say?
That appears to be true of particle physics.Science is a systemic study of natural phenomena, it doesn’t say anything about it’s own philosophical or ontological implications. It’s up to individual scientists and philosophers to do that. Here’s theoretical physicist Anthony Aguirre;
“We break things down into smaller and smaller pieces, but then the pieces, when we examine them, are not there. Just the arrangements of them are…if things are forms of forms of forms, and if forms are order, and order is defined by us…they exist, it would appear, only as created by, and in relation to, us and the universe. They are, as the Buddha might say, emptiness.”
That appears to be true of particle physics.
And so....?
That appears to be true of particle physics.
And so....?
Then we have two options: 1. Wait for science to find out, or 2. Say 'Goddidit'.Science has not reached any conclusion on the matter.
Breaking down things to smaller and smaller pieces, I get 'space / energy'.We break things down into smaller and smaller pieces, but then the pieces, when we examine them, ..
Maybe it's more that we are perceived little, and mistake the part for the whole.And so nothing is ever quite as it seems. Our experience of the world around us is often quite illusory. This much became apparent on the grand scale, when humanity collectively accepted that the sun neither rises in the east nor sets in the west.
Braking down just makes yaThen we have two options: 1. Wait for science to find out, or 2. Say 'Goddidit'.
Braking down things to smaller and smaller pieces, I get 'space / energy'.
I'll go with option #1, wait for science to find out.Then we have two options: 1. Wait for science to find out, or 2. Say 'Goddidit'.
Then we have two options: 1. Wait for science to find out, or 2. Say 'Goddidit'.
Breaking down things to smaller and smaller pieces, I get 'space / energy'.
Maybe it's more that we are perceived little, and mistake the part for the whole.
If ya say soThe reductionist mindset, prevalent in “post enlightenment” Europe, and now perhaps the world, sees a universe composed of a plurality of discrete things, but easily loses sight of the whole altogether.
Yes. There is no other way.That’s some faith you have, in science’s capacity to reveal truths about nature. But can science ever tell you why we are here .. or indeed why anything is? Can it tell you why the universe goes to all the trouble of existing?
No. In my belief (Advaita Hinduism), there is no duality. The name itself means absolute non-duality without any exception.The reductionist mindset, prevalent in “post enlightenment” Europe, and now perhaps the world, sees a universe composed of a plurality of discrete things, but easily loses sight of the whole altogether.