Yes, the same ones as you I think. Any prophet based religion is incompatible to me. I just can't see how God could every delineate all that power to a single person.
If I may ask, given that Christianity (as well as Alawite Islam) is an
incarnational religion which believes that the gift of prophecy has been given to everyone post-Christ by the Holy Spirit, do you think it still falls under the '
prophet-based' category? The incarnation of God in Jesus has no cognate in Judaism or Islam, but it does bear
some similarity to Hindu avatars.
In positing that Jesus is a pre-existent divine being in a Godhead with two other Divine Persons, rather than a prophet, and in adopting such practices as veneration of saints, Marian devotions ("
the Queen of Heaven") and so on, I've always thought that the differences between the other Abrahamic faiths and traditional (pre-Reformation) Christianity are at times actually greater than the similarities. I mean, you don't get statues and images in Jewish, Islamic or Baha'i houses of worship for good reason - whereas Catholic churches are just littered with statues to different saints, the Blessed Virgin and so on. The optics, at least, are very distinctive.
And then, you have Quaker Christianity with its emphasis on the "
divine light" in all people and its de-emphasising of doctrine.
For this reason, I've spoken with Jews who don't even think the Abrahamic label is all that meaningful as a signifier of this particular set of religions emanating from the Semitic near-east.