Of course, people have the right to choose wrong.michel said:Right Sir!!! Stands to attention.
Ever heard of freedom of choice ?Knockout
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course, people have the right to choose wrong.michel said:Right Sir!!! Stands to attention.
Ever heard of freedom of choice ?Knockout
while that may be true, on this forum, people do not have the right to say anothers religion is wrong - lets watch what we say please :tsk:mormonman said:Of course, people have the right to choose wrong.
sorryMike182 said:while that may be true, on this forum, people do not have the right to say anothers religion is wrong - lets watch what we say please :tsk:
not a problemmormonman said:sorry
Okies! Here we go, over here. Please let me know if there are any aspects of the opening statement you'd like me to change. Thank you. *bows*mormonman said:I can go into a one-on-one debate.Knockout lol
Perhaps you would benefit from opening your closed mind a bit and letting in some light.mormonman said:Of course, people have the right to choose wrong.
Sure you do. Let me take a wild guess: You voted for George W. Bush, right? :biglaugh:mormonman said:I have an open mind to things that make sense.
Ummmmmmmm..........What has a persons political beliefs have to do with an open mind? One could say the same thing of just about every single person ever voted into office. So other than making light of or just joking around and merely being something of jest, I don't get it. Are we now as a people going to attack others and belittle them with the saying.......... "You voted for George W. Bush, right? :biglaugh:" I think it no worse than "Hey, you voted for Al Gore, right?" Or "Hey, you voted for Kerry, right?" I'm sorry I shouldn't have said "we as a people". Only a flaming left wing democrat would suggest something to someone without even having a clue as to whether they were of the same political party as themselves. Further proof why that party is dying a slow and painful death. So this brings me to the OP and me wondering just what percentage, I wonder, of democrats as to republicans are wanting to see the change of the "In God We Trust" on this nations currency? What a no-brainer question that is. :bonk:retrorich said:Sure you do. Let me take a wild guess: You voted for George W. Bush, right? :biglaugh:
your welcome.steve at JRM said:Thank you Mike182. What does minion of darkness mean?
I would have if I could have, but I'm 17 right now. I know who I'm voting for in the election in 2008, Mitt Romney.retrorich said:Sure you do. Let me take a wild guess: You voted for George W. Bush, right? :biglaugh:
I have a prediction related to this...if Michael Newdow gets in the news regarding one of his lawsuits to remove 'Under God' from the pledge or 'In God We Trust' from money, the Republicans will paint the Democrats as the party supporting him. In that scenario, the Democrats will lose famously.wmam said:...So this brings me to the OP and me wondering just what percentage, I wonder, of democrats as to republicans are wanting to see the change of the "In God We Trust" on this nations currency?...
Ah...Mitt Romney: The poster boy for homophobia. Perhaps he could choose Sen. Santorum as his running mate on the Bigots for Jesus ticket. Their campaign slogan could be "Go STRAIGHT to Heaven!" :biglaugh:mormonman said:I would have if I could have, but I'm 17 right now. I know who I'm voting for in the election in 2008, Mitt Romney.
retrorich said:Ah...Mitt Romney: The poster boy for homophobia. Perhaps he could choose Sen. Santorum as his running mate on the Bigots for Jesus ticket. Their campaign slogan could be "Go STRAIGHT to Heaven!" :biglaugh:
I agree to a point. I have already posted that I personally would have rather seen "In YAH We Trust" or so, but I really do not believe that even with what anyone would call "god" I am finding it really hard to see that anyone truly trust in anything other than what I again have already posted as in death and taxes. I do agree, though, that for any party to back such a thing as to take what has been a national tradition for so many years and especially one that has, as you put it, been "debated ad nauseum and backed up and attacked with quotes from our Founding Fathers ad infinitum" something of thought and foundation since the formation of this nation would be sudden and painful death in my honest opinion.CaptainXeroid said:I have a prediction related to this...if Michael Newdow gets in the news regarding one of his lawsuits to remove 'Under God' from the pledge or 'In God We Trust' from money, the Republicans will paint the Democrats as the party supporting him. In that scenario, the Democrats will lose famously.
For the record, I support keeping God in both. His being there does not constitute 'state-sponsored religion' but serves as a reminder to the important of religion in the founding and growth of the U S of A. These points have been debated ad nauseum and backed up and attacked with quotes from our Founding Fathers ad infinitum, so I have no interest of reliving them here.
Yeah, well, Rome did pretty good for some 500 years with their pagan gods as well.steve at JRM said:I think our country has became one of the most powerful on earth is because we do trust in God. Think about it, in 200 years, we've become more successful than other countries that have been around for a couple of 1000. Founding our great country on the belief that all are equal because everyone is one of God's children has been pretty successful. The only reason we have problems today is because people forget that.