Native
Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
OP Subject: Impossible Galaxy Debunk Conventional Cosmology.
Once again, astrophysical and cosmological theorists and scientists are baffled over new discoveries which don´t confirm the standing theories and its predictions.
Article citation:
"Scientists have found the oldest, most distant galaxy yet: EGS8p7 appears to be a mere 600 million years younger than the universe itself. But according to current theories on the history of the universe, this galaxy shouldn’t even exist.
Remark # 1: "mere 600 million years younger than the universe itself".
Remark # 2: "this galaxy shouldn’t even exist".
"Soon after researchers at Caltech spotted EGS8p7 using the Hubble and Spitzer Telescopes, they set about to determine its approximate age. This is done by examining the amount and spectrum of light radiated by the galaxy and comparing its “redshift” to those of other galaxies. Redshift is a distortion caused by distance akin to the Doppler effect, except it works on light instead of sound. The further away an object is, the redder and dimmer its light appears to the observer. The researchers used a detection device called multi-object spectrometer for infrared exploration (MOSFIRE) to pick up the galaxy’s spectral signature".
Remark # 3: ME: Redshift measuring can only be used on a ROTATING object and not as a linear distance measuring of a local object.
"EGS8p7 has a redshift of 8.68, which makes it the most distant galaxy yet to be discovered. When we start dealing with exceptionally distant cosmic objects, light emission and age are linked by the speed of light and the time it takes for an object’s image to reach us across space. Based on this combination of data, this ancient galaxy is approximately 13.2 billion years old. It’s so far away that we’re looking at a snapshot of the galaxy from its infancy, as it first formed.
Remark # 4: The speed of light and its luminosity isn´t constant as it dispersed on its way to the measuring instruments, thus giving wrong impressions of cosmic distances.
"This takes us back to a time in the universe’s first billion years when it was full of clouds of uncharged hydrogen atoms. A few hundred million years later, young galaxies heated up the hydrogen gas and gave it an electric charge. This boiling, ionized hydrogen created a spectral light signal called the Lyman-alpha line, and it is this signal that gave away the existence of EGS8pt"..
Remark # 5: This directly debunks a Big Bang.
Remark # 6: This also debunk the conventional idea of formation of stars and galaxies in general.
"But the detection of this Lyman-alpha line is at odds with our current timeline for the universe. The galaxy’s redshift and age indicates that it created this light signature during a phase when there was no medium for light to travel through. 13.2 billion years ago, the universe’s hydrogen gas had yet to become ionized, and these thick clouds would have absorbed the photons making up EGS8p7’s light signal before they had a chance to travel across the light-years towards us. The researchers should not have picked up the signal at all".
Remark # 7: The BB-Timeline doesn´t fit.
Remark # 8: No medium for light to travel through.
Remark # 9: No yet ionizing of hydrogen.
"Astrophysicists are still fumbling to explain the galaxy’s spectral presence. The authors of the paper speculate that hydrogen ionization occurred in fits and bursts across the universe. EGS8p7 may have contained extraordinarily bright and powerful stars that released strong enough ultraviolet rays to ionize a bubble of hydrogen gas, allowing the galaxy’s light signature to propagate".
Remark # 10: This speculation goes against the very even distribution idea of a Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
"Further analysis of the data will reveal whether this theory holds, or if astrophysicists need to rewrite their timeline for the infancy of the universe".
Remark # 11: Every time the standing conventional cosmological science meets such significant surprises, they "possibly need to rewrite" their basic cosmology, but this happens very seldom.
1) Newtons assumed gravity cannot be explained scientifically by what dynamical means it should work, but it´s still taken for granted.
2) Newtons "universal law of celestial motion around a central governing gravitational object" was contradicted on galactic scales > "Dark Matter" was invented but Newtons law is STILL in work, thus having TWO different theoretical orbital motions in the same local Milky Way galaxy.
3) "Dark energy" was invented to "explain" and exponential distance faster expanding of the Universe, not pondering over from where a Big Bang expansion suddenly got this extra expansive energy.
-----------
Summing up the above remarks and these 3 paragraphs, it certainly is much needed to go back to the cosmological drawing board and rewrite the entire theory, possibly by discarding the Big Bang and gravitational ideas completely, and logically revising the standing distance measuring methods.
No further inventions of "dark this or that" or further inventions of new "pink or scottish tartan colored forces" is needed to patch up the 350-100-Present year cosmological problems, which keeps on popping up in the faces of conventional thinking cosmological scientists.
It´s about high time the present astrophysical and cosmological science practice a real scientific method instead of inventing and adding artificial thinks to the observable Universe just to make it fit impossible and unnatural human theories and ideas.
Regards
Native
Once again, astrophysical and cosmological theorists and scientists are baffled over new discoveries which don´t confirm the standing theories and its predictions.
Article citation:
"Scientists have found the oldest, most distant galaxy yet: EGS8p7 appears to be a mere 600 million years younger than the universe itself. But according to current theories on the history of the universe, this galaxy shouldn’t even exist.
Remark # 1: "mere 600 million years younger than the universe itself".
Remark # 2: "this galaxy shouldn’t even exist".
"Soon after researchers at Caltech spotted EGS8p7 using the Hubble and Spitzer Telescopes, they set about to determine its approximate age. This is done by examining the amount and spectrum of light radiated by the galaxy and comparing its “redshift” to those of other galaxies. Redshift is a distortion caused by distance akin to the Doppler effect, except it works on light instead of sound. The further away an object is, the redder and dimmer its light appears to the observer. The researchers used a detection device called multi-object spectrometer for infrared exploration (MOSFIRE) to pick up the galaxy’s spectral signature".
Remark # 3: ME: Redshift measuring can only be used on a ROTATING object and not as a linear distance measuring of a local object.
"EGS8p7 has a redshift of 8.68, which makes it the most distant galaxy yet to be discovered. When we start dealing with exceptionally distant cosmic objects, light emission and age are linked by the speed of light and the time it takes for an object’s image to reach us across space. Based on this combination of data, this ancient galaxy is approximately 13.2 billion years old. It’s so far away that we’re looking at a snapshot of the galaxy from its infancy, as it first formed.
Remark # 4: The speed of light and its luminosity isn´t constant as it dispersed on its way to the measuring instruments, thus giving wrong impressions of cosmic distances.
"This takes us back to a time in the universe’s first billion years when it was full of clouds of uncharged hydrogen atoms. A few hundred million years later, young galaxies heated up the hydrogen gas and gave it an electric charge. This boiling, ionized hydrogen created a spectral light signal called the Lyman-alpha line, and it is this signal that gave away the existence of EGS8pt"..
Remark # 5: This directly debunks a Big Bang.
Remark # 6: This also debunk the conventional idea of formation of stars and galaxies in general.
"But the detection of this Lyman-alpha line is at odds with our current timeline for the universe. The galaxy’s redshift and age indicates that it created this light signature during a phase when there was no medium for light to travel through. 13.2 billion years ago, the universe’s hydrogen gas had yet to become ionized, and these thick clouds would have absorbed the photons making up EGS8p7’s light signal before they had a chance to travel across the light-years towards us. The researchers should not have picked up the signal at all".
Remark # 7: The BB-Timeline doesn´t fit.
Remark # 8: No medium for light to travel through.
Remark # 9: No yet ionizing of hydrogen.
"Astrophysicists are still fumbling to explain the galaxy’s spectral presence. The authors of the paper speculate that hydrogen ionization occurred in fits and bursts across the universe. EGS8p7 may have contained extraordinarily bright and powerful stars that released strong enough ultraviolet rays to ionize a bubble of hydrogen gas, allowing the galaxy’s light signature to propagate".
Remark # 10: This speculation goes against the very even distribution idea of a Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
"Further analysis of the data will reveal whether this theory holds, or if astrophysicists need to rewrite their timeline for the infancy of the universe".
Remark # 11: Every time the standing conventional cosmological science meets such significant surprises, they "possibly need to rewrite" their basic cosmology, but this happens very seldom.
1) Newtons assumed gravity cannot be explained scientifically by what dynamical means it should work, but it´s still taken for granted.
2) Newtons "universal law of celestial motion around a central governing gravitational object" was contradicted on galactic scales > "Dark Matter" was invented but Newtons law is STILL in work, thus having TWO different theoretical orbital motions in the same local Milky Way galaxy.
3) "Dark energy" was invented to "explain" and exponential distance faster expanding of the Universe, not pondering over from where a Big Bang expansion suddenly got this extra expansive energy.
-----------
Summing up the above remarks and these 3 paragraphs, it certainly is much needed to go back to the cosmological drawing board and rewrite the entire theory, possibly by discarding the Big Bang and gravitational ideas completely, and logically revising the standing distance measuring methods.
No further inventions of "dark this or that" or further inventions of new "pink or scottish tartan colored forces" is needed to patch up the 350-100-Present year cosmological problems, which keeps on popping up in the faces of conventional thinking cosmological scientists.
It´s about high time the present astrophysical and cosmological science practice a real scientific method instead of inventing and adding artificial thinks to the observable Universe just to make it fit impossible and unnatural human theories and ideas.
Regards
Native