Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Democrats will vote to either condemn a resolution for his racist comments on twitter or to impeach?What the heck is condemn? They keep saying they are voting on weather to condemn Trump? Whats that gonna do if anything, what the heck is condemning?
Democrats will vote to either condemn a resolution for his racist comments on twitter or to impeach?What the heck is condemn? They keep saying they are voting on weather to condemn Trump? Whats that gonna do if anything, what the heck is condemning?
That passed already with the votes from many Democrats.They could vote to increase funding to improve living conditions for detainees, but that would mean they actually care about illegal immigrants though...
That passed already with the votes from many Democrats.
That is not the truth either. You are using an equivocation on the word crisis. The alleged problem was not that the conditions were poor, the alleged problem was that immigrants were invading and there were a whole bunch of nefarious people intermixed between them.Only after 6 months of denial, and even then they changed the bill so that more border patrol couldn't be hired etc.
Should have got passed 6 months ago if they really cared.
The alleged problem was not that the conditions were poor, the alleged problem was that immigrants were invading and there were a whole bunch of nefarious people intermixed between them.
The funds Trump was askingfor were for a wall.
Let us not play like the conservatives were the humanitarians here.
Nope, out of $4.6 billion, $3 billion was earmarked for aid. Food, shelter, medical care for the detainees. The rest was for hiring more border patrol and repairing existing structures.
Obviously that's grossly simplified
Democrats will vote to either condemn a resolution for his racist comments on twitter or to impeach?What the heck is condemn? They keep saying they are voting on weather to condemn Trump? Whats that gonna do if anything, what the heck is condemning?
I do not remember hearing anyone talk about the horrible conditions in border detention. You have a link of conservatives or republicans or libertarians or liberals or Democrats talking about the conditions of detention as a crisis?Both were true. Dems denied the whole situation in the beginning, then later tried the narrative of it was a fabricated crisis, then eventually "oh yeah it's a crisis".
Nope, out of $4.6 billion, $3 billion was earmarked for aid. Food, shelter, medical care for the detainees. The rest was for hiring more border patrol and repairing existing structures.
It is the truth though.
I do not remember hearing anyone talk about the horrible conditions in border detention. You have a link of conservatives or republicans or libertarians or liberals or Democrats talking about the conditions of detention as a crisis?
Maybe it's used more loosely in charities or private companies. But in the U.S. govt it's bit more strict.
Earmark (politics) - Wikipedia
That's pretty interesting, actually, so thanks.
But based on my simplistic example, the earmarked funds (for the med equipment) are indeed allocated to the med equipment. However that was paired with a reduction in other funding, then redirected to spend within the same broad budget group.
This would still work, if I'm understanding things correctly. All the more formal earmarking does is ensure the new spend goes to what it's been allocated to...although in reality that can be harder to track than it sounds.
That was may of this year... that you said this was the issue 6 months ago is getting shakier every post.Well when the Pres draws up a $4.6 billion bill and says we need it for extra food, beds, shelter, and medical care. That kinda says it all.
That was may of this year... that you said this was the issue 6 months ago is getting shakier every post.