Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
61% + 49% = 110%. And no, your own article pointed out that this was an exceptional year. Hmm, I wonder why
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If the Rich needs to pay their fair share in taxes, Biden needs a mirror then.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Prices were lower back then.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Yes, your post IS hypocritical... as expected.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Yes, your denial is quite evident, since we never once saw a post from you complaining about how the Orange Clown fought so hard to get a huge tax break for the rich while fighting to keep his own taxes a secret.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I don't mind tax breaks as long as it's being shared across the board
you went from one thing to another. i think you've already made up your mind; so why did you start a thread?
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Please do point out where you posted complaining about the grossly disproportionate share of tax cuts that the rich received during the Trump years.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It's your job to look in the archives. I don't have the patience to devolve through the drudge.
I will give you a hint however:
I made threads in the past about the inequality of wealth distribution particularly involving fortune 500 companies that paid 0 taxes.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Your hypocrisy stems from your constant need to criticize the sitting president for doing things that are a fraction as egregious as the Orange Clown you rarely if ever criticized.
Lol... My mistake makes it even more poignant. 39% of the people paid all the taxes.61% + 49% = 110%. And no, your own article pointed out that this was an exceptional year. Hmm, I wonder why
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yep, but again one never tries to make a case with an extreme anomally.
As my post suggested... the case isn't more money - it is less spending... no anomaly, whether R or D - it is spend more and more and then cry and cry that there isn't enough money.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It could be. But again, one never uses an extreme anomaly to supports one case. If one can show how that one year was extremely unusual it effectively refutes your argument. NOw think really hard. was there an event in 2020 that could have affected how much money that people earned?
Regular year - 58% pay for all the taxes... same issue.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
But that is still incorrect.
Not according to the article I read.
2018 -https://money.cnn.com/2018/05/22/pf/taxes/2018-no-income-tax-explainer/index.html
Is it true that only 53 percent of Americans pay income tax?
what we do have to do... is cut out loop holes... not increase the rates.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You appear to have misunderstood it because I did not see that claim there.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You edited your post and it does not match your later claims. I doubt if you will see your error.
You said this:
"Regular year - 58% pay for all the taxes... same issue."
The article was not about all the taxes. Have you ever ran a business?