Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
No. Willful dishonesty is unhealthy. If we willingly deny what we know to be true, we will in effect be embracing insanity. And sooner or later that decision will come back to do us harm.For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
If the possibility exists, the belief is valid.For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
I can't even imagine God not existing.
Viewing existence through a theistic paradigm provides great strength and hope for some people. It's one way to provide meaning to an otherwise mundane life.
For the sake of discussion, let's assume God doesn't exist. Assuming that God doesn't exist, would there still be some benefit to believing in God?
No. Willful dishonesty is unhealthy. If we willingly deny what we know to be true, we will in effect be embracing insanity. And sooner or later that decision will come back to do us harm.
I agree that if we did not know this to be so, then we could still choose to believe that God does exists, and this would not be a dishonest choice. But this is basically the scenario we are in now, so I assumed that this thread was referring to a scenario in which we did know.you are assuming that the people would know God doesn't exist. It is entirely possible that in this scenario, God doesn't exist and nobody knows either way.
No. Willful dishonesty is unhealthy. If we willingly deny what we know to be true, we will in effect be embracing insanity. And sooner or later that decision will come back to do us harm.
But these are two different questions. To believe in your idea of God is different than to believe in a God that is beyond and apart from your idea of 'Him'. I don't think the OP was asking about our idea of God, but about a God that would or would not exist apart from our ideas or even cognizance.I don't think it's willful dishonesty. By accepting a belief in God despite contrary knowledge, you are creating a symbol that benefits you in some way. For instance, I accept God as the Spirit of Life. God is symbolic of the meanings I glean from this life experience. Whether or not there is a true, honest-to-God God somewhere, I can still believe in this symbol.