Sirona
Hindu Wannabe
While continuing to wade through the swamp I found something sounding more scientific, possibly explaining both the hurt feelings of former Baha’is that I found out about and the question why Baha’is were characterized as seemingly pedantic.
ICSA - Founded 1979 - Enemies Within - Conflict and Control in the Baha i Community
It’s from the International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA), so make of it what you will, but I think it offers valuable insights, so check it out if you want to bother yourselves with what is given as reasons for the mindset of probably a lot of Baha’is. There’s really a load to read but the main argument seems to be this:
The author also mentions that the Baha’i members in poorly-functioning assemblies are told that things will get better in the future when the Faith has grown and better administrative structures are in place.
There’s certainly a lot more to discuss in the article than what I can mention now ... so please share your views.
ICSA - Founded 1979 - Enemies Within - Conflict and Control in the Baha i Community
It’s from the International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA), so make of it what you will, but I think it offers valuable insights, so check it out if you want to bother yourselves with what is given as reasons for the mindset of probably a lot of Baha’is. There’s really a load to read but the main argument seems to be this:
...the Baha'i Faith places adherents in a psychological bind by simultaneously upholding liberal ideals, which attract intelligent and creative people, while at the same time exerting pressure towards obedience and conformity. This conformity is enforced by the attitudes of fellow adherents, intimidation by Baha'i officials, and sanctions, including excommunication and shunning, limitation of participation in community affairs, and most recently, simply dropping nonconformists from the membership rolls.
There is a real sense, among those Baha'is that experience this disillusionment, of being hoodwinked or betrayed. They believe they are joining a broad-minded and tolerant religion and become actively involved in its promotion, only to run up against authoritarian expectations that they find insupportable. Since individual experience and tolerance towards authority figures vary, it sometimes takes years for that limit to be reached, leaving former members expressing bitterness and loss for the portion of their lives they spent promoting the religion and serving the needs of the administration.
The author also mentions that the Baha’i members in poorly-functioning assemblies are told that things will get better in the future when the Faith has grown and better administrative structures are in place.
In this emphasis on future expectations, rather than serving the needs of the [current] membership, the Baha'i Faith can be fairly compared with the Jehovah's Witnesses, another strongly missionary group with a high turnover in membership.
There’s certainly a lot more to discuss in the article than what I can mention now ... so please share your views.