Nah...I never would have got the hot chick if I followed that advice...
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I need help forming opinions
- Thread starter Cooky
- Start date
Nah...I never would have got the hot chick if I followed that advice...
The foundation is reasonable premises.
Logic & reason are the scaffolding.
Wikipedia has a fine article on Chinese history that includes a lot of information about their politics of the 10th Century. Apparently, the political landscape was very divisive in that place and period. You should support the Song Dynasty.
Cooky
Veteran Member
Thanks For that! I especially thank you For not posting links.
No problem. I think with the right set of outside directions you can effectively argue China into the 11th Century.
Would you like to buy an argument?
Cooky
Veteran Member
Oh, no, that would be going overboard. All I need to know is that my team supports the Song dynasty. I'm set.
The big push right now is to make Louie Louie the official dynasty song. You should be good.
Cooky
Veteran Member
Let me guess, you were never a fan of Seinfeld when that show came out. A lot of people weren't.
Mine is a kind of dark sarcasm, I'll admit. Not exactly 'humor' per se, but in that general category.
...Basically I'm making fun of RF.
Last edited by a moderator:
Cooky
Veteran Member
I mean seriously. If you think about it, It's just a bunch of people throwing out their opinions on stuff, and typically, people are not anxious to teach via providing sources.
Honestly, there were a few times I did request a link, and was basically told to shove it. Also, a lot of the SJW topics are based on perceived expectations on what others are supposed to 'think'.
...But don't get me wrong, I enjoy RF. That's why I come here, and even partake in the very things I'm talking about... But sometimes, I just have to make fun of it for what it is.
Honestly, there were a few times I did request a link, and was basically told to shove it. Also, a lot of the SJW topics are based on perceived expectations on what others are supposed to 'think'.
...But don't get me wrong, I enjoy RF. That's why I come here, and even partake in the very things I'm talking about... But sometimes, I just have to make fun of it for what it is.
Cooky
Veteran Member
An effective method for teaching on forums, which I've seen in the past, is to not only provide a link, but to also copy and paste a paragraph or two that illistrate your point, and put it in italics with parenthesis around it.
...I know the Christians always do it with their scripture, but It's been shown to be effective in other circles as well, especially when citing scholarly articles.
Generally, I think It's fun to learn new things. I wish people would teach me more. I know people here know stuff -they just need to share it.
...I know the Christians always do it with their scripture, but It's been shown to be effective in other circles as well, especially when citing scholarly articles.
Generally, I think It's fun to learn new things. I wish people would teach me more. I know people here know stuff -they just need to share it.
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me guess, you were never a fan of Seinfeld when that show came out. A lot of people weren't.
Mine is a kind of dark sarcasm, I'll admit. Not exactly 'humor' per se, but in that general category.
...Basically I'm making fun of RF.
Nah, I liked Seinfeld. But more to the point, I liked Blackadder.
I just fell into the Poe's Law trap.
*Tips hat*
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
Let me guess, you were never a fan of Seinfeld when that show came out. A lot of people weren't.
Mine is a kind of dark sarcasm, I'll admit. Not exactly 'humor' per se, but in that general category.
...Basically I'm making fun of RF.
Good point.
is that what Trump is doing with the USA.?
or is that giving him too much credit?
he specilises in unsupported opinion.
Last edited:
Cooky
Veteran Member
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
I sort of doubt That's what he's doing.
You mean that that would need too much intelligence and wit for him to manage.?