BSM1
What? Me worry?
does your eye offend you?
Good question. Looking at it that way I may have to have my wife's middle finger surgically removed.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
does your eye offend you?
you said something about rescuing people from their superstitions...Who said anything about "saving" anyone? I don't even know what you mean by that word.
Instead, I just think that the choice between blind, superstitious belief informed by a vague fear of death (which I don't really have in the first place) and a rational approach to existential questions is actually rather simple and quick.
you said something about rescuing people from their superstitions...
and who are you to label another person's belief as superstition?
and then recue them away from their superstitions
There's nothing wrong with the former. The latter is very very sad. I dont know if some realize it, though.
I think you should withdraw.....and consider why you are here in a religious forumBy George, that is not "saving" anyone. It is just having basic human decency.
I happen to be Luis Dantas, but I could be anyone really. There is no particular requisite to be met.
Someone who often has to face the choice between doing so or failing to.
Again, that is in no way remarkable. Unfortunately.
That what I said ... "helping" people to question their own beliefs. No need to repeat what I just said.only if they are actually helping....
Well, at least he isn't vague with his comments.I have considered.....and said so....
and no....I see no quality in you that you can save anyone.
I assume it is to debate religious beliefs/dogma/ideas. And, he does a good job of being direct rather than vague . It's pretty absurd to think that a religious debate forum would be confined to religious people. Actually, that would be a travesty, imho. Very boring.I think you should withdraw.....and consider why you are here in a religious forum
I think it's fair to demand that the religious defend their beliefs as not being mere superstitions. If they can't, that is a clear indication that they should question said beliefs and get to the bottom of what made them start believing in the first place and whether that reasoning is sound. That is ALWAYS beneficial for EVERYONE.you said something about rescuing people from their superstitions...
and who are you to label another person's belief as superstition?
and then recue them away from their superstitions
People who are not forced to believe and rather Want to believe, I see nothing wrong with that. If their religion is all they see and it helps them find meaning, who am I to say they are wrong or they have an unhealthy relationship with their religion. Not everyone falls in the category of religious abuse. I mean there was one person here that said he/she was completely happy in their faith that there were no flaws. Which surprise me because I love myself some chocolate. Its one lf my favorite flavoes but it does leave an after taste.I don't know if there is nothing wrong with someone so ingrained in religious ideas that they can't seek non-religious meaning in life. Don't you know a lot of sad/angry/confused religious people with no direction? I do.
Some people are comfortable with religion defining their lives, and for those folks that's fine. Some have religion so strongly thrust on them at such and early age that they don't know they have a choice. They are uncomfortable with their faith but it's so ingrained they can't seek a truth that fits them better. I think those cases are sad.
I think you should withdraw.....and consider why you are here in a religious forum
What about kids though? Should they be brought up to believe things that aren't accurate simply because their parents have held true to their faith?People who are not forced to believe and rather Want to believe, I see nothing wrong with that. If their religion is all they see and it helps them find meaning, who am I to say they are wrong or they have an unhealthy relationship with their religion. Not everyone falls in the category of religious abuse. I mean there was one person here that said he/she was completely happy in their faith that there were no flaws. Which surprise me because I love myself some chocolate. Its one lf my favorite flavoes but it does leave an after taste.
Who can claim perfection? As long as no one is hurt. Did you read my example/post of my therapist and the man who hears voices?
He may be dellusioned and he lives with it. He is no longer in need of medical attention. Same as the religious, if we want to compare them to those delluted. There is nothing wrong with thejr dellusion as long as its helping them.
I cant see why it is so wrong that religion helps people.
Good question. Not sure what he meant by that. I like how he threw the tired ... "why is a non-religious person on a religious debate forum" ... at you, though. I've found that when theists on RF get pushed into a corner, they lash out using either this or the equally tired personal assaults on your personal beliefs.Withdraw from what?
What about kids though? Should they be brought up to believe things that aren't accurate simply because their parents have held true to their faith?
I think human progression in understanding is paramount to any religious belief. When we stifle progress by adhering stubbornly to religious beliefs, ignoring any evidence that contradicts them, we aren't only harming ourselves, but our future as a species. Religious beliefs are fine, but when stubbornness denies someone's ability to learn and discover, that is dangerous and unacceptable.If their parents feel that is reality, logically why would they not?
If the parents feel stealing is wrong, then why is it wrong to "teach" not force them to believe that it is a d the consequences of it. Later on in life, that child might do otherwise. They can change their view and steal all they want. Howeverx according to the parents (not me) if that is their morals and it isnt being forced on the child, I see nothing wrong with that.
For me personally, it would be nice to grow up ina healthy, religious environment. However, I love learn about others truth. So defining mine from childhood would not help Me.
Not All kids feel the same way when they are older. Thats why I see nothing wrong with it in and of itself.
I dislike religion because it portrays lies as truth to children too young to know the difference.
People who are not forced to believe and rather Want to believe, I see nothing wrong with that
Not everyone falls in the category of religious abuse. I mean there was one person here that said he/she was completely happy in their faith that there were no flaws.
Which surprise me because I love myself some chocolate. Its one lf my favorite flavoes but it does leave an after taste.
Who can claim perfection? As long as no one is hurt. Did you read my example/post of my therapist and the man who hears voices?
He may be dellusioned and he lives with it. He is no longer in need of medical attention. Same as the religious, if we want to compare them to those delluted. There is nothing wrong with thejr dellusion as long as its helping them.
I cant see why it is so wrong that religion helps people.
Do you think religious beliefs themselves prevents one from learning or he use and indoctrination of those beliefs whatever it is prevents learning?I think human progression in understanding is paramount to any religious belief. When we stifle progress by adhering stubbornly to religious beliefs, ignoring any evidence that contradicts them, we aren't only harming ourselves, but our future as a species. Religious beliefs are fine, but when stubbornness denies someone's ability to learn and discover, that is dangerous and unacceptable.
If their parents feel that is reality, logically why would they not?
If the parents feel stealing is wrong, then why is it wrong to "teach" not force them to believe that it is a d the consequences of it
I think this has been proven to be the case in certain circumstances. Of course, there are no absolutes, so there are always exceptions. But, there is an apparent danger.Do you think religious beliefs themselves prevents one from learning or he use and indoctrination of those beliefs whatever it is prevents learning?