Sorry but only appears to be wishful thinking. There appear to be even better explanations from the evolution side since they can find evidence for their claims.We see purpose, by their interaction.
Amazing y’all miss this.
Just by observing interactions between organisms… there is a balance that’s quite obvious.
There is always prey for the predator. Why? Since survival is the best pressure, prey animals should quickly evolve fangs, talons, poison their flesh, whatever is needed to stop those hunters.
But we don’t see that. The balance is maintained. Rodents have been around for eons.
If the ‘gene is selfish’, it’s mutations wouldn’t maintain the equilibrium we observe.
Selfishness does nothing but disrupt, and brings disorder & chaos.
You won’t want to believe this, but the evolution of the genome that we do observe, is of Divine origin, and has Divinely-set limits. IMO.
I will explain my thoughts, later… I’m tired.
@nPeace , @YoursTrue , y’all might like this, too.
Scientific evidence is not a hard idea to understand. Nor is the bar as to what qualifies for it very high. Which makes it even more of a puzzle why creationists cannot provide any scientific evidence for their beliefs, just as they failed in the Dover trial. An argument from ignorance is never "evidence".