How do we know the Bible was not written by demons?

[firedragon]

If it is wrong, why do we still continue following the numbering system in reference to Jesus Christ?
Assuming he is just a fictional character.
Isn't it right to change the numbering system to a more relevant or real reference so we could put things straight?
Can't we refer our years to a real historical person, assuming Jesus is a fictional character?
Is the world, stupid?

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?
2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

 

[MJFlores]

@syo
@firedragon

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?

Please look at:

#191syo, May 25, 2020

"Have you read the new testament? And did you find it historical??? It's a huge GHOST-STORY. Harry Potter has more truth than the new testament. A virgin birth??? Walking on water??? Come ON!"

2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

Assuming the people who say Jesus Christ was a fictional character, isn't it proper to change the annual number system of the calendar to correct and give reference to a non-fictional character [assuming Jesus Christ is a work of fiction]? Such as:

1. GENGHIS KHAN.
2. ALEXANDER THE GREAT.
3. TAMERLANE.
4. ATILLA THE HUN.
5. CHARLEMAGNE.
6. PHARAOH THUTMOSE III OF EGYPT.
7. ASHOKA THE GREAT.
8. CYRUS THE GREAT.

 

[firedragon]

@syo
@firedragon

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?

Please look at:

#191syo, May 25, 2020

"Have you read the new testament? And did you find it historical??? It's a huge GHOST-STORY. Harry Potter has more truth than the new testament. A virgin birth??? Walking on water??? Come ON!"

2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

Assuming the people who say Jesus Christ was a fictional character, isn't it proper to change the annual number system of the calendar to correct and give reference to a non-fictional character [assuming Jesus Christ is a work of fiction]? Such as:

1. GENGHIS KHAN.
2. ALEXANDER THE GREAT.
3. TAMERLANE.
4. ATILLA THE HUN.
5. CHARLEMAGNE.
6. PHARAOH THUTMOSE III OF EGYPT.
7. ASHOKA THE GREAT.
8. CYRUS THE GREAT.

You didnt answer the questions mate.

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?
2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

 

[MJFlores]

You didnt answer the questions mate.

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?
2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?

@syo assumed that
See #191syo, May 25, 2020

2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

Assuming the people who say Jesus Christ was a fictional character [like @syo , isn't it proper to change the annual number system of the calendar to correct and give reference to a non-fictional character [assuming Jesus Christ is a work of fiction]?

 

[firedragon]

1. Why would you assume "He is a fictional character"? Who said that?

@syo assumed that
See #191syo, May 25, 2020

Not relevant to me right mate?

2. Why would anyone want to change the numbering system? Who said that?

Assuming the people who say Jesus Christ was a fictional character [like @syo , isn't it proper to change the annual number system of the calendar to correct and give reference to a non-fictional character [assuming Jesus Christ is a work of fiction]?

Not relevant to me right mate?

 

[MJFlores]

Not relevant to me right mate?

Not relevant to me right mate?

Yep, not relevant.

 

[Muffled]

The new testament is literature written by people. It's fiction. Why do you mention demons?

I believe the Bible is the Word of God and your view of it is fiction.

 

[Muffled]

Have you read the new testament? And did you find it historical??? It's a huge GHOST-STORY. Harry Potter has more truth than the new testament. A virgin birth??? Walking on water??? Come ON!

I believe the concept that something isn't true because it is supernatural lacks foundation. However we know Harry Potter is fiction because the author states that it is. We know the Bible is the Word of God because it states that it is.

 

[Muffled]

2019 has nothing to do with Jesus.

I believe I had everything to do with 2019.

 

[firedragon]

I believe the concept that something isn't true because it is supernatural lacks foundation. However we know Harry Potter is fiction because the author states that it is. We know the Bible is the Word of God because it states that it is.

Interesting. Which verse are you referring to? What is it specifically referring to?

 

[danieldemol]

Crud, it wiped my edits.

Sweden is always rolled out as a fake example.

It was rolled out as an example that "socialism can work."...

No it was not, it was rolled out as an example that secular states can work.

Let’s define secular state;
‘A secular state is an idea pertaining to secularity, whereby a state is or purports to be officially neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion.[1]’*

*From Secular state - Wikipedia

Likewise, atheism has a suicide problem in this country where they are 30%.

But what about the other 60%? Church of Sweden. Sorry, guys.

Religion in Sweden - Wikipedia

One need not be either atheist and/or socialist or to support the concept of a secular state.