metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
In this case, "big bang" isn't a reference to what happened 13.8 million years ago but has a sexual aspect to it that may not have been obvious unless one understand American slang.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How could first big-bang explode?
- Thread starter paarsurrey
- Start date
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
My three kids are not a "myth".
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Yeah...but do they believe in your big bang theory?My three kids are not a "myth".
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
They better because they're a byproduct of it. Although for some reason when someone mentions it I hear "Ewwwwwwwwwww!!!".Yeah...but do they believe in your big bang theory?
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
That'll change in time......
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Not. They're 47, 46, and 42, and I still hear "Ewwwwwwwwwwww!" even though each of them is married and have kids. Now it's my turn to say "Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww, our kids aren't virgins!!!".
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Good grief...you must be as old as I am....no more big bangs for me....
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
I'm too tired to even think about it.
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Well celibacy is supposed to be appropriate for spiritual practice.....there's that to it...