rosends
Well-Known Member
exactly!So let's discount them - in which case these no argument whether Jesus is the Messiah
because the Gospels are fiction.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
exactly!So let's discount them - in which case these no argument whether Jesus is the Messiah
because the Gospels are fiction.
No it doesn't. The verse from Micah is referring to Jesse as the progenitor of the Messiah having come from there.Knowing how to distinguish the Messiah is clearly a problem.
Micah 5:2. 'But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.'
Do you not believe this prophecy of Micah? It's not a New Testament passage.
Yet you do believe that Jesse lived in Bethlehem [1 Samuel 16:1], and that his family are associated with the city. Birth in this city gives credence to the Messianic claim.
That narrative tells you more about what the authors of the Christian Testament believed, then what regular Jews believe.You can't have it both ways. The Jews accused Jesus of being fake because he was
a Galilean. And they cited scripture to the effect that the Messiah must come from
Bethlehem.
I once heard that the Raelian prophet Rael visited a Rabbi and said, "If Moses came back to life would you follow Moses or continue to follow the Torah?" He said, "I would continue to follow the Torah." Perhaps that is what's going on here.
Christian belief is that they are supposed to try to get Jews back to Christianity. I'm sorry for saying so but it's the most important thing in my entire church. I am only allowed to do so much on RF.
I cannot read those scrolls/books (although I do try to read the Torah in Hebrew daily), so I don't know what you're reporting to not meet the requirements of the Jews.
No, just tell it what it is saying.
Knowing how to distinguish the Messiah is clearly a problem.
Audie tiresomely points out that this is why predictionss "cone true".The Bible verse about Jesus having a long life is a reference to the resurrection. There are verses in the Tanakh where things are plainly implied but not explicitly stated. How could the Messiah have died and yet prolonged his days? I believe Isaiah 53:10 refers to the servant's continued activities after his death.
And you believe that this means that any future messianic person has to be born in Bethlehem? Maybe the problem is in clearly understanding the verse and prophecy. This verse remarks about the family that came from Bethlehem and how from that family a future leader will arise. That family is the origin of the Davidic line which would exclude anyone not (paternally) from the family.
No it doesn't. The verse from Micah is referring to Jesse as the progenitor of the Messiah having come from there.
Actually, that is not true. The HEBREW text makes it clear how one knows who is who.
For example, the word messiah for Christians means something different than the word (משיח) means for Jews. Thus, Christians confuse themselves when they think we Jews are looking for someone when the Hebrew Tanakh is clear that we Jews won't be looking for anyone. No different than the generation that was taken out of Egypt didn't have to look for Mosheh - especially when one considers what Hashem stated the sign would be.
View attachment 46505
So if you understand the prophecy incorrectly, the rest flows from that.The first thing to accept is that prophecy points us to the Holy One of God.
'Out of thee shall he come forth', are the words used in the KJV, but maybe you have a completely different reading?
Yes, I believe that the Messiah born on earth of the line of David must be born in Bethlehem. It's consistent with all the Davidic parallels used of the Messiah.
The genealogy of Jesus Christ gives a paternal line from David.
The genealogy of Jesus Christ gives a paternal line from David.
Are you disagreeing with the statement that the Messiah will be a man born on earth?
Actually, that is not true. The HEBREW text makes it clear how one knows who is who.
For example, the word messiah for Christians means something different than the word (משיח) means for Jews. Thus, Christians confuse themselves when they think we Jews are looking for someone when the Hebrew Tanakh is clear that we Jews won't be looking for anyone. No different than the generation that was taken out of Egypt didn't have to look for Mosheh - especially when one considers what Hashem stated the sign would be.
View attachment 46505
Are you disagreeing with the statement that the Messiah will be a man born on earth?
It doesn't have to be a monarchy although I think that's the most likely. But it could just as well be a Prime Minister or other such national leader.
It's currently not possible, however, the Messiah isn't chosen because of his lineage. There could and probably are many people today carrying the right lineage. But if his lineage isn't the right one, then that would disqualify him. Again, not something we know about most people today.
In Gen. 1:28. Since there's a commandment to have children and the Messiah is righteous, he would not absolve himself from this commandment.
Of course, it's possible that the Messiah would be impotent or his wife barren. But Isa. 35:5-6 describes the Messianic Age as a time when the ill and lame would be made whole again, so even if either of them were, they'd be healed.
Quick question. Which geneology is the paternal line? Matthew or Luke?
This may also help you.