Surya Deva
Well-Known Member
My Hindu brothers and sisters, I want to help you guys out by sharing the little knowledge I have. It is better out than in me, so I am going to be posting regular topics on Hinduism. I am not doing this for personal gain or interest, I genuinely just want to share the knowledge I have collected myself for the use of others.
The Hindu prescription for life is Yama and Niyama. The Yama and Niyamas are possibly the best way one can lead life and live a very noble life. They are the first rung of Ashtanga Yoga and the noble 8-fold path, and they are also enumerated in the Upanishads.
In a sense you could say they are like the Hindu moral commandments, but that is actually false. They are guidelines to healthy and noble living as opposed to a list of thou shall nots. They are flexible as opposed to rigid.
Yamas
Yamas are morals and they are universal. If you breach the Yamas you will necessarily incur negative karma according to Hinduism. The Yamas are:
Ahimsa or Non-harming
You should not harm others in thought, actions or speech. This does not just include people, it includes animals, plants, environment, things. Yes, it necessarily includes vegetarianism. But you could say but we cannot not harm completely(Jainism takes ahisma to the extreme) after all we have to harm something to live; we have to cut down the trees for tables; we have to take plants and fruits; we have to swat the annoying mosquitos and flies. And what about people, sometimes we have to harm them as well, maybe in self-defence, maybe by telling them a bitter truth. Yes, Hinduism recognises this, and says that it is all in the intention. To act with the intention to cause the minimum amount of harm. An animal does not incur negative karma if it kills, because it has no bad intention; it is simply acting out from its nature. But a human being if it does someting wrong suffers guilt. Hinduism is very direct about this, anybody be it even the most henious killer, will experience that guilt, they will know deeper down that what they are doing is wrong.
Thus intention is everything. If you can cause someone harm without intending it you are free from that karma. I may save a child who will grow up to be a mass murderer, does that mean I am partly responsible? No, because as far as I am concerned I did my dharma by saving the child. Had I known that the child was going to grow up to be a mass murderer and still saved it, then I would be responsible.
Do you know there are stories in Hindu lore that if an enlightened person commited a crime they would be punished more severely than an unenlightened person. Why? Because the enlightened person acts in knowledge and unenlightened person acts in ignorance. Just as we pardon the crimes of a child, likewise karma pardons the crimes of an ignorant person, but a knowledgeable person it does not.
We enter into the the karmic loop as soon we consciously harm others. Indeed even the law pardons the criminal who acts from a less than conscious state, it is called diminished responsibility. Now did Arjuna not consciously harm others by slaying his kin? No, because his consciousness did not see that as harm, it saw that as dharma/duty and it was perfectly aligned with divine will. There was no guilt. He did what was right. This is the pecularity in the Hindu Ahimsa, that sometimes harming others is the greatest act of unharming - like killing a mass murderer or killing one to save 10,000.
Now I am sure you can understand just how open to misintepretation this is and indeed the doctrine of the Gita has been used to devestating effect by Hindu extremists. They are doing the divine will by killing Muslims, raping nuns ---- that is what they say. But even the most fanatical of extremists will have an understanding that what they are doing is wrong, their conscience will not let them have a moments peace. They act with intenton and knowledge, so they become subject to karma.
Therefore Ahisma is simply living your life with the intention to not harm others in your actions, your thoughts or your speech and doing your best to maintain that.
The Hindu prescription for life is Yama and Niyama. The Yama and Niyamas are possibly the best way one can lead life and live a very noble life. They are the first rung of Ashtanga Yoga and the noble 8-fold path, and they are also enumerated in the Upanishads.
In a sense you could say they are like the Hindu moral commandments, but that is actually false. They are guidelines to healthy and noble living as opposed to a list of thou shall nots. They are flexible as opposed to rigid.
Yamas
Yamas are morals and they are universal. If you breach the Yamas you will necessarily incur negative karma according to Hinduism. The Yamas are:
Ahimsa or Non-harming
You should not harm others in thought, actions or speech. This does not just include people, it includes animals, plants, environment, things. Yes, it necessarily includes vegetarianism. But you could say but we cannot not harm completely(Jainism takes ahisma to the extreme) after all we have to harm something to live; we have to cut down the trees for tables; we have to take plants and fruits; we have to swat the annoying mosquitos and flies. And what about people, sometimes we have to harm them as well, maybe in self-defence, maybe by telling them a bitter truth. Yes, Hinduism recognises this, and says that it is all in the intention. To act with the intention to cause the minimum amount of harm. An animal does not incur negative karma if it kills, because it has no bad intention; it is simply acting out from its nature. But a human being if it does someting wrong suffers guilt. Hinduism is very direct about this, anybody be it even the most henious killer, will experience that guilt, they will know deeper down that what they are doing is wrong.
Thus intention is everything. If you can cause someone harm without intending it you are free from that karma. I may save a child who will grow up to be a mass murderer, does that mean I am partly responsible? No, because as far as I am concerned I did my dharma by saving the child. Had I known that the child was going to grow up to be a mass murderer and still saved it, then I would be responsible.
Do you know there are stories in Hindu lore that if an enlightened person commited a crime they would be punished more severely than an unenlightened person. Why? Because the enlightened person acts in knowledge and unenlightened person acts in ignorance. Just as we pardon the crimes of a child, likewise karma pardons the crimes of an ignorant person, but a knowledgeable person it does not.
We enter into the the karmic loop as soon we consciously harm others. Indeed even the law pardons the criminal who acts from a less than conscious state, it is called diminished responsibility. Now did Arjuna not consciously harm others by slaying his kin? No, because his consciousness did not see that as harm, it saw that as dharma/duty and it was perfectly aligned with divine will. There was no guilt. He did what was right. This is the pecularity in the Hindu Ahimsa, that sometimes harming others is the greatest act of unharming - like killing a mass murderer or killing one to save 10,000.
Now I am sure you can understand just how open to misintepretation this is and indeed the doctrine of the Gita has been used to devestating effect by Hindu extremists. They are doing the divine will by killing Muslims, raping nuns ---- that is what they say. But even the most fanatical of extremists will have an understanding that what they are doing is wrong, their conscience will not let them have a moments peace. They act with intenton and knowledge, so they become subject to karma.
Therefore Ahisma is simply living your life with the intention to not harm others in your actions, your thoughts or your speech and doing your best to maintain that.
Last edited by a moderator: