Jeremiahcp
Well-Known Jerk
I am willing to bet Biden still thinks she is better than Trump.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hillary Was Not A Great Candidate Says Former VP Joe Biden
- Thread starter esmith
- Start date
I am willing to bet Biden still thinks she is better than Trump.
How about Bush the second getting a third term?
I would be ecstatic for a third Bush Jr term at this point. I would get down on my knees and thank him personally. He was infinitely more competent than Trump.
PositivePlatypus
Member
Eh. He might have done okay. It is fun to think about but I think he is done in politics.
PositivePlatypus
Member
I don't think she was a great candidate either and certainly not my first choice.
We clueless bumpkins preferred a crazy wild card to
yet another war mongering incompetent socialist crook.
But hey.....some voters like those.
"She's Richard Nixon in a pantsuit....looks good to me!"
As for Biden, it turns out he was too busy with other activities to run....
DNC Chair Tracks Down Biden In Everglades Tossing Whole Chickens To Gators
Last edited:
Jeremiahcp
Well-Known Jerk
"another war mongering incompetent socialist crook."
So then why did you elect one?
He was prettier than the other one.
(And I knew he'd make all the lefties utterly furious.)
leibowde84
Veteran Member
Everyone already knew this.
leibowde84
Veteran Member
I bet Biden would have obliterated Trump. He was worlds beyond Hillary in likability.
Jeremiahcp
Well-Known Jerk
Also I am not convinced he was much of a wild card, since he is acting very much as predicted: Vain, petty, narcissistic, and a complete disaster in the office. The majority of us knew he was a giant idiot who should never be President and that is why the majority voted against him.
He certainly would've been a fun candidate.
He had no political record by which to judge.
Add to this a whiff of instability.
"Wild card" is an ambiguous metaphor.....I mean wildly unpredictable.
Yes.....the archetypal politician with regard to those personal traits.
Too early to judge what will actually result.
If he starts no wars, I'll call it a success.
But it's premature....we've almost 4 years of exciting times ahead of us.
And a majority of voters (52%) rejected Hillary too.
When the Libertarian gets over 3% of the popular vote, we know
the Dems & Pubs are offering us 2 steaming piles of former haggis.
Last edited:
Jeremiahcp
Well-Known Jerk
"Too early to judge what will actually result.
If he starts no wars, I'll call it a success.
But it's premature....we've almost 4 years of exciting times ahead of us."
BSM1
What? Me worry?
He's still the Prez and she isn't (I started to say ain't but I didn't want to enforce your stereotyping a large section of Americans).
"Socialist"? You should know better than that. She's neoliberal and therefore pretty much an ultra-capitalist. It was Trump who played the right-wing protectionist card.
Oh, you loopy lefties.....you really believe that things are"Too early to judge what will actually result.
If he starts no wars, I'll call it a success.
But it's premature....we've almost 4 years of exciting times ahead of us."
so bad based only upon how you feel about the drama.
Tear filled eyes can blind one to reality. It's why so many
of you see him as Hitler, & us voters as Nazis.
Here.....
While drama can presage the future, I prefer tangible
things when passing judgement....
Let's consider Bush.....started 2 wars, bad tax policy, Wall St bailouts.
Now Obama....disastrous Obamacare, more bad tax policy, bail-outs for large companies instead of little people.
Trump.....nothing accomplished but one USSC nominee. The rest of his record is to be determined.
Last edited:
You're missing the humor in my response.
But while she is not a socialist, she would indeed steer
the country in that direction more so than would Trump.
By exerting ever more federal control over the means of
production, our mixed economy would have more socialism
in the mix.
"Ultra-capitalist"? No....but she certainly uses it for political
& personal advantage. To call her an "ultra-capitalist" would
be like calling a wolf "ultra-ovine".
At least we've morphed from "deplorables" to "bumpkins".
The latter sounds friendlier.
Odd, ain't it.....Hillary fans are supposed to be the progressive & tolerant ones,
but they're the ones doing the vast bulk of the name calling & personal dissing.
We're a country of illiberal liberals, uncaring conservatives, & libertarian kooks.