• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hey Socialist liberals...want 'immigrants'? Ya got em!

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Left or right....I can't seem to convince anyone to use a dictionary definition of "socialist".
It's either <something I like> or <something I hate>.
So by that standard, raw fish, infomercials, mint ice cream, & lutefisk are "socialist".

Only dirty socialists care about proper definitions. ;)
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Go look up what "socialist" means before using it again. You clearly have no idea what it means, and using it as a generic epithet at every opportunity is tiresome.
I already gave it and it sticks. Democrats are socialist and I'm going to keep on calling it as it is.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Go look up what "socialist" means before using it again. You clearly have no idea what it means, and using it as a generic epithet at every opportunity is tiresome.
I already gave it in another thread and it still sticks. It's not my fault you don't want to read it.

However it does not diminish the fact that Democrats are in fact socialists and I'm going to keep on calling it as it is for as long as it continues to infiltrate the United States government. You're just going to have to get used to it.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Trump's doing ya a great favor by filling up your 'Sanctuary' cities and you could show us that wonderful utopian beauty of socialist policies in action. The opportunity of a lifetime!!

And now what happens??.

The Wicked Witch is fuming!

Pelosi fumes over White House plan to release immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities

Typical socialist. Do them a favor and they go bat**** nuts.
Let him (it's not happening). He'll infuriate his base for letting him in and it might sink his 2020 ship.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
I already gave it in another thread and it still sticks. It's not my fault you don't want to read it.
It's not our fault you just do not realize Socialism and Liberalism, though both Left winged, are very different political philosophies with Liberalism being way closer to the center.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
I find that they care the least.
They're the ones who regularly tell me that it's wrong to use a dictionary definition.
I find, more or less, it's a person thing than a political thing to care or not care about dictionary definitions depending on situation and personal factors.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I find, more or less, it's a person thing than a political thing to care or not care about dictionary definitions depending on situation and personal factors.
But only avowed socialists carp about dictionary definitions.
Conservatives who misuse the word don't give me that grief.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Conservatives who misuse the word don't give me that grief.
They do, just with different words (such as, their concept of freedom does extend beyond their neighbor's nose rather than ending there). Whether it's "free markets," "communism," "socialism," medical definitions, legal definitions, I can't wait until we can install brain apps and everyone gets the OED uploaded to their brain.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
They do, just with different words (such as, their concept of freedom does extend beyond their neighbor's nose rather than ending there). Whether it's "free markets," "communism," "socialism," medical definitions, legal definitions, I can't wait until we can install brain apps and everyone gets the OED uploaded to their brain.
Even when they use a noncromulent definition, & I object, they
don't criticize me for wanting the dictionary definition used.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Even when they use a noncromulent definition, & I object, they
don't criticize me for wanting the dictionary definition used.
As I demonstrated in the transgender thread about the Canadian law, sometimes dictionary definitions don't really work (in this case strictly using the dictionary definition of mutilation being applied to life saving surgeries, which no clinician or doctor would actually accept as mutilation though it does fit by strict dictionary definition).
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
As I demonstrated in the transgender thread about the Canadian law, sometimes dictionary definitions don't really work (in this case strictly using the dictionary definition of mutilation being applied to life saving surgeries, which no clinician or doctor would actually accept as mutilation though it does fit by strict dictionary definition).
Still, I prefer standard definitions to personal ones.
I saw the "mutilation" vs "modification" argument, & blame that on subjectivity & value laden usage.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
What made up number.

There are around 5.2 native americans. You do the maths

The majority of Americans were born in America ergo not immigrants. Nor is immigrant a hereditary status. Native Americans didn't found America ergo the settlers were not immigrants. Get a dictionary before you babble about math.
 
Top