My sincere apologies if my word choice seemed unfriendly. It was not my intent.
In thinking about a possible relationship between organ transplant and AIDS, I am wondering if you are skeptical of the reported deadliness of AIDS. If we can suppress the immune system and people live long lives in that state, perhaps you are questioning whether a disease that attacks our immune system is as deadly as it is portrayed.
I must say, alluding to "hidden truths" and "things not to be heard at any cost" is not exactly friendly either. It is much better to be honest and open, and plainly and exactly state the "hidden truths" and "what cannot be heard at any cost".
It was another language barrier. It happens in best families
If we analyze the answer of the third question attentively we will deduce the inverse of what you expected me to say (bold above).
Let us analyze its two possibilities:
[1] The patient has to keep using immunosuppressant drugs to live in relative harmony with the planted organ while his body is vulnerable to any infection during the rest of his life.
Speaking practically, every patient who got a donor organ has to live as if he were infected by AIDS (whatever the claimed cause is). In other words, if a healthy victim got the main constituents of these drugs, in one way or another and without his knowledge (this can happen easily at hospitals, in the criminal world, by taking advantage of the victim's ignorance), he would lose his body's immunity and be presented to the world as being infected (during his sexual activities) by AIDS (a virus or whatever). And the victim cannot defend himself, in any way, because no one will believe him/her, even his/her own family; this is a clear example of the modern 'perfect' crimes.
[2] The patient got the 'Immunosuppressant drugs before the operation. But after staying for a while in the intensive care room, his doctor will let him return back home to live normally again as a healthy person does. This case means that the medical discovery was completed fully by also finding a way to restore the lost immunity (actually in the case of such patients, its functions were just dimmed or paralyzed). This explains how almost every rich victim (male or female) can buy his life (and his honor!) to restore his lost immunity by paying any amount and/or accepting any proposed deal since he thinks he was infected by AIDS while he was doing sex with a stranger!
The loss of immunity in the victim's body could be 'partial' or 'total' (the two cases are likely related to the dose, inserted in the body).
In the latter case, there is no way to restore it and it will be a question of time for the victim to die soon after he will be infected by any virus or microbe.
I will jump now to tell you how it was possible for me to save certain lives:
A couple of years after my city was connected to internet, I got an email from a Nigerian girl asking me for financial help. This was the trend at that time! I saw myself asking her if she heard of AIDS. She replied: "Yes of course I did. Many hundreds die daily in my city because of it". So I asked her: "Didn't your city welcome some foreign doctors to save its citizens from AIDS?". She was surprised for knowing this. And she added that she also helps one of these doctors as a nurse. So my next email was something like:
"I like you know, though you don't have to believe me, that AIDS is not a decease which can propagate from one person to another (during sex for example; as the international news insists on almost daily). The loss of immunity is caused by something which has to be inserted in one's body intentionally though I am not sure how exactly. So to protect yourself, don't let any stranger, mainly if he is a foreign doctor, touch your body for any reason and don't get any medicine that you and your family are not familiar to or is claimed to be related to AIDS in any way."
About a year after my last email, she wrote me:
"Do you remember me? I liked to tell you that I am alive with a few members of my family and some friends who trusted and applied your advice as I did. Alas, all other people with whom I lived died because of AIDS."
In fact, too many millions of Africans died because of AIDS. And I recall a white man telling me: Aren't you white? Why do you care of what happened or may happen to Africans? Well, if an ordinary person, he was, can think that way, we may imagine to how far some powerful ones can think and do.
Soon later, I thought it was good to write an article and publish it on a local newspaper. I wrote it in Arabic and its title was: "What behind AIDS stories". A local journalist, he was one of my customers, read it and asked my permission to publish it. He didn't find anything on it which could prevent publishing it. But, a few days later, he returned back to inform me that his boss refused it. I bet you cannot guess the reason for which it was refused
Well, his boss found (and he was right) that the article would certainly upset to a great extent ‘all’ Muslim and Christian clergies in the city who were telling their believers, almost daily at that time, that AIDS is a clear sign of Wrath of Allah/God (because they live some evil sexual fantasies!).
Since no one I knew in my surrounding got AIDS, I had no urgent reason to convince the authorities of what I know (there are other details not mentioned here). But those who knew me or live with me were glad for knowing that they won't get infected by the so-called AIDS decease/virus (leading to loss of immunity) no matter how they live sexually
For instance, I learnt later that even the local authorities had (still has) no choice but to be involved in spreading and confirming officially all AIDS stories (as being a natural global decease, threatening the existence of human race!) as they are approved by the greatest systems (hence by UN too, as usual).
Now, it is your turn to comment. Please, be free to present anything that you know and contradicts what I said.
(More to come if you like)
