paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Theists and Atheists alike to discuss it.
Proof and evidences are appreciated.
Regards
Proof and evidences are appreciated.
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Naturalism has. If you ask for proof and evidence i might report you for trolling it should be self evident. All scientific and technological progress.Theists and Atheists alike to discuss it.
Proof and evidences are appreciated.
Regards
I find it interesting and a little strange that you list those three things in the title (Atheism, Agnosticism and Skepticism) as if they are the same thing.Theists and Atheists alike to discuss it.
Proof and evidences are appreciated.
Regards
What is meant by influenced? There is no influence to speak of nor even required for atheism.Theists and Atheists alike to discuss it.
Proof and evidences are appreciated.
Regards
Agreed. but neither Pol Pot nor Stalin encouraged or even allowed skepticism.Pol Pot and Stalin were atheist.
One day people may realize people are people, and we'll be violent, nasty, and horrible as long as we are around; religion not needed.
Specifically anti-religion? Or do you mean everything that wasn't religious in origin? Everything that wasn't religious in origin covers almost all of the known science and advancements we have today. But in terms of an anti-theistic philosophy I don't know. Or do you mean secularism? I think secularism has been an objective good for our societies today yes.Theists and Atheists alike to discuss it.
Proof and evidences are appreciated.
Regards
It may be the allowance and tolerance of asking questions and skepticism have had the greatest influence. Both atheism and theism have inspired great things and unimaginable cruelties, and they have both been intolerant, to the point of death, towards questions and skepticism.Agreed. but neither Pol Pot nor Stalin encouraged or even allowed skepticism.
Not sure how much influence I would put on either belief in god or lack thereof.
Here's one fun fact: Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Linus Torvalds all atheists so the direction of operating systems comes in big part from atheists.
What do you think of this article regarding Dawkins? What makes him a militant?I think there has to be a distinction drawn between everyday normal atheists and the Hitchens/Dawkins militant type.
I wouldn't describe most atheists as militants. The days of Communist hijacking of atheism are gone.Jobs was an atheist, but he was also a buddhist who believed in reincarnation. That's not typical of militant atheists at all.
I think there has to be a distinction drawn between everyday normal atheists and the Hitchens/Dawkins militant type.
Jobs was an atheist, but he was also a buddhist who believed in reincarnation. That's not typical of militant atheists at all.
Communism has only hijacked atheism because of anti-communist propaganda. As long as the strong misconceptions about communism persists, there will probably always be those who believe atheism leads to the violent state-dictatorships we have called communist.The days of Communist hijacking of atheism are gone.