"the assumption that everything moves at the maximum velocity of light has apparently already been proven incorrect in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiments. These experiments Einstein himself took part in, but then refuted for no discernable reason. So it is widely assumed that the logical connections in Einstein’s theories are sacrosanct, when actually they are not universally accepted."
Gravitational Waves & General Relativity
This is from your site. You really should look this stuff up before you make statements such as the above. First, EPR didn't perform any experiments. EPR is
a paper, published in 1935 based on an idea developed initially by Einstein but formulated into a specific example with the help of his co-authors and written largely by the formal logician of the trio. Second, the paper was an attempt to show that quantum mechanics must be incomplete, because it predicted theoretical outcomes that it could not account for. Specifically, singlet states could be prepared that were, according to QM, single systems yet which possessed seperable properties measurable by experiments. Bohm, in his textbook
Quantum Theory, reformulated the idea into the form it is almost always presented in: that of spin states of paired photons in a singlet state. The theory describes such a system as a single entity, but of course the actual individual photons can be and have been observed in actual experiments such that a measurement of the system in one location means that the outcome of measurement yet to be performed is somehow determined instantaneously by the observation in the first location.
Third, EPR didn't show (or prove) that the velocity of light is the maximum velocity (in fact, nobody believes this- rather, nothing with mass can travel faster than light nor can signals propagate faster than light but there exist theoretical entities like tachyons which must always travel faster than light). Rather, they attempted to show that quantum mechanics contained within it the possibility of learning the outcome of a measurement of a quantum system without it being measured. Hence the operation definition in the paper of objective reality in the terms used.
Fourth, Einstein didn't "take part" in any of these imaginary "experiments", he was the initiator and was primarily responsible for the whole of EPR, which again was
not an experiment but a paper. He showed that QM allowed for measurements in one location at some time
t forced possible but as yet unrealized measurement outcomes of the same system to have definite values despite the uncertainty principle and (more importantly) in contradiction to the representation of the system in QM, which did not yield or even really allow for such a value to be definite.
