Gowdy: If they had something on Trump, Schiff would have already leaked it.

[tytlyf]

That's OK, have it your way. I have decided I'm done.
Bye

Tim Allen's reason isn't good enough for ya? Too many conspiracy theories from RW media. Let's see if I can find one.

Here we go. Look at all the conspiracy theories. Just as I predicted. First comment too.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-holly...servative-tim-allen-sitcom-last-man-standing/

 

[fantome profane]

Again didn't read or as I suspected didn't comprehend
It was the "second rated comedy" in ABC lineup. Hardly call that "poor ratings". Well maybe poor ratings for those without a sens of humor. Hint hint

Even if this were so, so what? ABC is not the government.

 

[ecco]

Or Benghazi

Watergate and Iran Contra resulted in criminal charges and convictions, Benghazi didn't. Why bring it up?

 

[ecco]

I was talking about prime time fictional boob-tube programs.

Well I understand the "View" is, how should I say, in the tank for the liberal/socialist (and no we don't watch it).

You don't watch it but you "understand" it is in the liberal/socialist tank.

That's a very telling comment. You apparently make decisions based on what other people tell you rather than finding out first hand for yourself.

You don't even know that it's not on in prime time.

I am out there as a liberal Democrat and I watch and enjoy Last Man Standing. For all of Tim Allen's RW Conservative spoutings, there are plenty of views from the other family members that counter it. Actually Tim Allen comes across as a caricature of RW Conservatives. I also watched Roseanne -same comment applied to her show. I also watched and enjoyed All in the Family.

Apparently some people cannot distinguish between Sit-Coms and Glenn Beck.

I, like other posters, would like you to tell us what "fictional boob-tube programs" you consider to be so liberal they offend you? Perhaps it's Big Bang Theory because Sheldon is an atheist.

 

[fantome profane]

Watergate and Iran Contra resulted in criminal charges and convictions, Benghazi didn't. Why bring it up?

It is interesting to note that some of the very same people who are screaming that the Russia investigation has gone on too long and must end are the same people who prolonged the Benghazi investigation(s) for years finding nothing.

 

[Shad]

I try not to pay too much interest to this topic, but, regardless of Trump, haven't some people already pled guilty?

Yes but mostly fraud, lying under oath, failure to disclose representation and conspiracy to cover up said representation.

 

[tytlyf]

Yes but mostly fraud, lying under oath, failure to disclose representation and conspiracy to cover up said representation.

Yep, the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. The investigation was accurate from the beginning. I'd put money on it that the Trump is caught up there somewhere. He's a liar too. Let's all just let the FBI finish their investigation. There is no time limit on these things. How about the phony Benghazi scandal? How many years and how many investigations that turned up nothing? Republicans are crooked.

That would be like democrats starting a silly investigation over the Niger attack. Democrats don't waste tax payer dollars over phony scandals like republicans do.

Don't worry, democrats are going to help drain the republican swamp in a few months. Clearly the republican base doesn't understand that the way to drain the swamp is to stop voting for swampsters.

 

[ecco]

It is interesting to note that some of the very same people who are screaming that the Russia investigation has gone on too long and must end are the same people who prolonged the Benghazi investigation(s) for years finding nothing.

Oh, OK & agree.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Watergate and Iran Contra resulted in criminal charges and convictions, Benghazi didn't. Why bring it up?

Seemed to go on for a long time

 

[ecco]

Impeach Rosenstein?



By Katie Benner

• July 25, 2018 WASHINGTON — A group of House Republicans escalated their feud with the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, on Wednesday, introducing articles of impeachment in a long-shot bid to oust the official overseeing the special counsel inquiry into Russian election interference.

However...

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/398923-gop-lawmaker-i-do-not-support-impeaching-rosenstein

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, last week ruled out the possibility of impeaching Rosenstein, saying there is not enough support for his ouster.

​

GOWDY???

 

[idav]

I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ?

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder

I highly doubt Schiff is the leaky faucet Trump, Guilliani, and Nunes are. Besides Mueller hasn’t been especially forthcoming with the choir boy Nunes ready to spill anything they get.