Why?
It's a lost of Self, a submission to something higher. This is right hand path, as far as I understand the term.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why?
Satanism is about freedom.Why?
There was a time I saw it in a similar vein. I argued extensively that any sort of theism or belief precluded the LHP. That was before I had a hard look at its roots.It's a lost of Self, a submission to something higher. This is right hand path, as far as I understand the term.
Here's a thought; where is the line for freedom? How much is too much?Satanism is about freedom.
Here's a thought; where is the line for freedom? How much is too much?
Does freedom end before or after one freely chooses to bow down before something or worship and believe in unseen forces?
Is that one choice too many?
These are of course rhetorical questions, but feel free to answer them if you want
What is "freedom" anyways?Here's a thought; where is the line for freedom? How much is too much?
Does freedom end before or after one freely chooses to bow down before something or worship and believe in unseen forces?
Is that one choice too many?
These are of course rhetorical questions, but feel free to answer them if you want
Why?
Wait? Aren't you the guy that thinks it's called 'left hand path' because of left handed people?The Left Hand Path is a path of individualism and NOT being the property of some greater entity.
A convincing illusion made so by our perception of the sequential nature of events. That is, we can read what has been but not will be. The mysterious nature of the latter makes it seem as though we are 'choosing'.What is "freedom" anyways?
And if you freely choose to destroy yourself?Hm, I'd say that freely worshiping is not the same as "selling your soul." It's an individual choice as opposed to a destruction of Self.
Hm, I'd say that freely worshiping is not the same as "selling your soul." It's an individual choice as opposed to a destruction of Self.
I see "selling your soul in exchange for freedom and/or power" to be the same thing as "self" destruction.And if you freely choose to destroy yourself?
Or, you may, in the shedding a lifetime of conditioning bit by bit through exercising these 'nastika', discover 'that pesky thing'.I see "selling your soul in exchange for freedom and/or power" to be the same thing as "self" destruction.
Do you want to be free from feeling bad due to your pesky conscience? Well, you can destroy your conscience, that part of you that is unique to you as an individual that helps you to discern and make judgements, by doing those very things that make you feel bad! If you do enough of these things, your conscience will die from assault and battery! You won't have to worry about that pesky thing that is unique to you as an individual anymore!
Here's a thought; where is the line for freedom? How much is too much?
Does freedom end before or after one freely chooses to bow down before something or worship and believe in unseen forces?
Is that one choice too many?
These are of course rhetorical questions, but feel free to answer them if you want
I prefer antinomianism, myself.Or, you may, in the shedding a lifetime of conditioning bit by bit through exercising these 'nastika', discover 'that pesky thing'.
Apparently you don't know what a rhetorical question is. Whoosh, right over top.The fact that you ask that shows that you have a fear of freedom - a fear of what you might do with it. That's exactly what god wants you to have. It's a way to keep you under his dominion and authority. If you can cast of those shackles, you will find that there is nothing to fear in relation to freedom.
To what?I prefer antinomianism, myself.
Destroying ones conscience.To what?
I prefer feather pillows to Ford trucks.Destroying ones conscience.
Are you confusing conscience with conscious?Destroying ones conscience.
no.Are you confusing conscience with conscious?