dfnj
Well-Known Member
Hey, I'm new to this forum and I'd like to kick around some ideas. Not looking for a fight and I don't want to go down the rabbit hole of dogmatism, but if you help me sharpen some of my ideas, I would greatly appreciate it. Here's a proof that I accept for the existence of God. It's basically based on rationalism, as I understand it. If you see points of error or need for clarification, please share. Thanks!
Definition - God is the self-sufficient existence of general consistency
- Rational reason assumes all reality is generally consistent (with self and other reality)
- This means all of reality exists in a manner that respects general consistency
- Things exist (eg your thinking about this God proof)
- Things that exist have a nature that is either arbitrary (bounded by something other than itself) or non-arbitrary (bounded only by itself)
- All arbitrary things are ultimately contingent upon some non-arbitrary thing. This is because either
- An arbitrary thing has a finite number of arbitrary things in a chain of causes
- An arbitrary thing has an infinite number of arbitrary things in its chain of causes. This means the thing is defined as the consequence of its infinite chain of causes, thus the thing is equivalent to the infinite chain of causes in a generally consistent reality. This chain is not bounded by anything outside the chain and therefore is non-arbitrary. Thus the thing, which is the chain, is non-arbitrary.
- Since (1) some thing(s) exist, (2) all things are either arbitrary or non-arbitrary, (3) all arbitrary things are contingent upon some non-arbitrary thing, then there must exist some thing that is non-arbitrary.
- God is the non-arbitrary thing that is self sufficient (being non-arbitrary) and generally consistent.
I do not see that it follows that just because bla bla bla then "then there must exist some thing that is non-arbitrary." It seems to me it is purely subjective are arbitrary to dub something as arbitrary or non-arbitrary. By the same chain of reason to include how we formulated our choices, then you could argue everything is non-arbitrary because we have no choice in thinking things are arbitrary and finite. This is because we are finite.
Also, your conclusion "God is the bla bla bla" has problems because you are using the word God to mean "plain old existence". Essentially your argument becomes God exist because existence exists and God is all of existence. All sounds and rings true as you read it but there is no way to know or prove that it is perfectly true.