I don't think we can inhabit both our physical reality and the true ecstatic union. We can live in union with God, but to push beyond into the furthest depths I believe we both agree exist, we have to shed our physical existence. Something that I believe has happened to living people who have experienced assumption.Rather, more how I've come to see it is that what "heaven" is, who we are in that state, is fully possible right here and now.
I fully agree.I find looking to an "afterlife" to be a distraction from the Eternal in every present moment.
I again agree with you, at least in principle, I just don't see my Theism as contradictory to that notion. The idea of "up there" is allegorical to the spiritual in my understanding. God is omnipresent, which means he's fully present in all, down to a true atomic unit.Theism tends more to too removed from the world, too aloof. God is far too much Present to be wholly transcendent save for a few miracles here and there dotted throughout history.
I was asking what you mean by separation itself, not what you believe separates us. When I say I am other than God, I mean that I don't share ontological identification with the divine. Not that he isn't present with us. I agree with you on that completely.As far as "separation" goes, my view is that the only thing separating us from God is our perceptual sense of self. We see ourselves as separate from others, and we imagine God as some entity "out there" like an "other", and that becomes the reality of our experience. Until we let God accidently come blasting through some crack we allowed. Then the Light that shines there tells you in no uncertain terms, God was never anywhere but fully Present the whole time.
I get the feeling that we may be coming at the same thing and using polar opposite terms. I could be wrong though. I'd say what separates us from God is losing our intended selves. It is when we surrender some part of ourselves, our goodness, our rationality, our emotionality and embrace that which isn't the perfect that we look around and see ourselves alone. It is when we still ourselves and find the I/ego/self given by God, and drive towards it, and eventually simply be, that we become aware of God with us.As far as "separation" goes, my view is that the only thing separating us from God is our perceptual sense of self.
I suggest that the right faith, idea, concept, belief, practice, behavior, etc. are complementary to the mystical. The presence of God demands, it demands action, thought, belief and faith. With faith in fact being of more import than mysticism. The mystic who has lit upon the divine but doesn't believe in and isn't moved by the willful God is not closer to God than the steel worker who has faith, in a God he's never had a mystical experience with, to share in love and joy.We don't see, because we are turned inward facing our own mind and thoughts, looking to them to see God; the right idea, the right concept, the right belief, the right practice, stopping this or that, etc.
That is an incorrect assumption. If I said anything that sounds like that, it certainly doesn't reflective my thinking.
Maybe I took it incorrectly. How could you explain, for instance, what you call my deity mystical experience bolstering the self-god distinction being authentic when you also say that a 'higher level' mystical experience leads to the self being illusion and promotes panentheism?All of what I believed to be true, was an illusion.
That's depressing. Not unexpected, but still. God in my experience is the author of confidence, and I have so far seen only where He has built upon prior knowledge and understanding imparted. In my life God has shown me that He exists, then that Christianity is true, then led me to being Catholic(something I Jonah'ed for quite a while), and now leads me to deeper and more fruitful, I believe, understandings of the faith He set down for man. There has never been a negation of what came before.I don't.
That wasn't my intention. I was merely attempting to illustrate that this isn't an area where 'research' comes to fast and hard conclusions and that I don't have much regard for claims that specific conclusions are 'higher level' spirituality. I can only point to my experiences with the divine and what they have revealed to me.I don't want to go the route of debating sources at this point, rather I would point to my own personal experiences.
You seem to have missed my point, Meister Eckhart maintained that he never went beyond the bounds of acceptable theology; that his views were firmly rooted in the truth of Christ as upheld by the Catholic faith.Yes, and critics there were! This is what happens when one pushes beyond the bounds of acceptable theologies the scholars have decided teach us of God.
You specifically said that you categorized my spiritual experience and understanding as "deity mysticism" and below the non-dualistic mysticism that you experience and understand which is "at the top". That is superiority.Well, I'm not sure where you have gotten the idea I am claiming superior insight.
Off the rails was for dramatic effect; maybe you don't see it this way, but I believe we are close in our ideas and it is in some, significant, minutia we find our disagreement.
It is indeed beautiful and true. Him and I, as one. But, still, Him and I. The unity of God doesn't eradicate the individuality of the participants. The ego/self doesn't die in death, it is perfected; in the perfection, unity. Separate in essence we willfully join with God in one existence.Interestingly, as I was typing this just now, I recall a quote I read from Meister Eckhart probably about 6 years ago I used to love, but had not thought of in years. Let me quote this and see if you see the same thing I just said about breathing as one.
"The eye through which I see God is the same eye through which God sees me; my eye and God's eye are one eye, one seeing, one knowing, one love."
That is absolutely beautiful, and absolutely true. One breath. One heart. One mind. One seeing. One knowing. One love. "I am my Father, are One".
I'm going to try to make a few more straightforward statements to ensure I haven't lost what you are really saying in the imagery we choose to use.I think there is something that may help get past the understanding that the self "dissolves" into God.
When I join the union with God, my "I", my personage, my separate identity remains. I will still be Mister Emu, perfectly connected with God, whom I am not. We, God, and all extant men and spiritual beings, will all be joined into one unified existence thus. We retain our ontological separation, we don't fuse into one being.
The way I've so far read you, is largely on the side of our identities and essential natures are included in the unification "the ego/self dies at death" "our identity is dissolved in God" "I find that God is not other to me", etc. Something like henosis? If I have read you incorrectly, please let me know.