The US Senate didn't make this stuff up.
Pointless.
This is information received by them FROM a large segment of the scientific community.
LOL.
The scientific consensus is that climate change is caused by anthropogenic causes and your argument is sure but there is a large segment of dissenters...
So lets focus for a second on this. Do more people believe climate change is caused by man or not? We can quote studies and have a link fest but the point is some of us have done our homework. You have not. When you are arguing from ignorance you do this weird confirmation bias posting and your critical thinking skills seem to fly out the window.
More scientists think that climate change is being driven by anthropogenic causes but you want to use the descriptive term of "LARGE SEGMENT" in terms of the community. And by Large you mean like 700.
How do you accurately represent a group which is clearly smaller then then the consensus as large? You just think 700 is large?
Why are you so strongly opinionated on something you clearly have not spent a lot of time looking into? Why do you care so much to repeat other peoples arguments that I'm not convinced you understand.
Rick, I keep posting this report, which has over 700 prominent, very well respected scientists worldwide commenting IN DETAIL about their reservations and even outright denial of the theory of global warming - but so far not one person has commented on this information.
This is what I mean... Confirmation bias... You found a link your gonna keep harping on that represents the opinion you apparently already hold. Like a doctor in the 1800's going along with the widespread belief that bloodletting cured sickness.
Oh, by the way - it's supposed to snow again tonight and then again on Wednesday here in east Texas.
That will be the fifth and sixth snowfall we've received in less than one year.
Unprecedented!
Because Unprecedented snow fall somehow supports your point of view? This type of ignorant clown car nonsense is why I try to steer clear of people who take a religious view that opposes a scientific theory. You do not have the respect or class to research a topic but will happily bash it with pompous silliness I presume you think is clever.
How do you want someone to respond to oh and btw more snow...
There's that phrase "climate change" rather than "global warming" again
Your not going to familiarize yourself with why one would use the name "climate change" over "global warming", the controversy itself, the IPCC etc etc but you want everyone else too and then come back and tell you your wrong so you can point out that there are respected scientists that disagree with the scientific theory.
Sure Kathryn... there are also respected scientists that disagree with evolution. (Perhaps even more the 700!) Other respected scientists spend all their spare time UFO hunting and working on anti-gravity machines. I do thank you for your amusing statement though:
Being the skeptic that I am - in general - I immediately started googling the names of these particular scientists, and from what I could tell, they are indeed well respected and legitimate scientists.
Last edited: