Have you noticed how much fun it is to fool yourself by attacking and condemning someone else for "feeling smug and superior" in such a manner that it makes you feel smug and superior to them?
Like,"Those religious folks think their religion makes them better than us atheists, but us atheists are really better than those religious folks because we don't go around feeling superior like they do".
Or, "Those atheist folks think their atheism makes them better than us religious folks, but us religious folks are really better than those atheist folks because we don't go around feeling superior like they do".
Ever notice how easy it is to fool yourself?
Ever notice how much fun it is?
I thinking ranking oneself as superior or inferior in comparison to other people pretty much goes with the territory of being human. It's almost impossible to escape doing it. So why should we condemn people for doing it? It is one thing to point out to folks that they are doing it -- but why try to condemn them for it? Does condemning people for feeling superior or inferior to you make any sense to you? Do you think condemning people is gong to change human nature? If so, why? If not, why not?
Like condemning Trump supporters?
I know this is not a political discussion but there is where most of the condemning takes place.
One has to feel they are right, possess the truth of being right.
Me condemning someone else doesn't resolve anything. The trick maybe is to get a person to consider condemning themselves. We try to establish moral absolutes and show the immorality of our "opponent". If we can encourage the acceptance of our moral high ground, then they may change their position.
Being amoral, like myself, allows a bit more flexibility in the position which one argues from.