"Friends" and "Sex and the City" question

[ronki23]

I haven't seen both series in their entirety but:

In Sex and the City the character least likely to be a relationship (Samantha) gets with a character even less likely to stick around (Smith) and he becomes the love of her life. But in the movie they break up.

So why don't they do a Friends movie to tie up the loose end: get Joey and Phoebe together. They're the only pairing that didn't happen in the show.

Movies can make big changes to the overall story

 

[Subduction Zone]

I never watched Sex and the City. But there was a follow up Fiends movie recently. I haven't seen it yet, but who knows? Maybe they did answer those questions for you.

 

[ronki23]

I never watched Sex and the City. But there was a follow up Fiends movie recently. I haven't seen it yet, but who knows? Maybe they did answer those questions for you.

It wasn't a movie; it was an on screen reunion and it was rather good

 

[Subduction Zone]

It wasn't a movie; it was an on screen reunion and it was rather good

Thanks for the response without spoilers. I guess that I should watch it.

 

[The Hammer]

I just saw "friends" and "sex" and I was intrigued.

Now I am disappointed.

It's about TV.

 

[Left Coast]

I haven't seen both series in their entirety but:

In Sex and the City the character least likely to be a relationship (Samantha) gets with a character even less likely to stick around (Smith) and he becomes the love of her life. But in the movie they break up.

So why don't they do a Friends movie to tie up the loose end: get Joey and Phoebe together. They're the only pairing that didn't happen in the show.

Movies can make big changes to the overall story

Joey and Phoebe are really nothing alike and would make a terrible couple. They didn't get together because their match would make no sense.

 

[ronki23]

Joey and Phoebe are really nothing alike and would make a terrible couple. They didn't get together because their match would make no sense.

Why didn't she get with David?

 

[SkepticThinker]

I haven't seen both series in their entirety but:

In Sex and the City the character least likely to be a relationship (Samantha) gets with a character even less likely to stick around (Smith) and he becomes the love of her life. But in the movie they break up.

So why don't they do a Friends movie to tie up the loose end: get Joey and Phoebe together. They're the only pairing that didn't happen in the show.

Movies can make big changes to the overall story

Phoebe already married Paul Rudd.

 

[ronki23]

Phoebe already married Paul Rudd.

Why not Hank Azaria ?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Why not Hank Azaria ?

I think he finally came back from Russia looking to hook up with her but she was in love with Paul Rudd by then and she turned him down. (I think?)

 

[ronki23]

I think he finally came back from Russia looking to hook up with her but she was in love with Paul Rudd by then and she turned him down. (I think?)

Bad writing

Same as Samantha and Smith breaking up

 

[SkepticThinker]

Bad writing

Same as Samantha and Smith breaking up

Yeah, I always wanted her to wind up with Hank Azaria.
No idea why they introduced Paul Rudd.