For the Trump supporter who can't read...

[Salvador]

Then why did Mueller write his report does not indict or exonerate Trump? Why did his investigation set into motion several additional investigations?

Two years and thirty million dollars later there's zero evidence the Trump campaign colluded with Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election; there's also zero evidence Trump obstructed with the Mueller investigation. It's time now for our Congress to move along to resolving important legislative issues.

 

[fantome profane]

The report available to me is redacted for legitimate legal reasons; therefore, I'll trust the opinion of the AG who has read the non-redacted report and William Barr knows more than just about anybody else what the entire Mueller investigation has concluded.

Even more than Mueller?

 

[Kenny]

Why are you having a problem understanding a straight forward question?

You said:

he {Mueller} never pursued the false representation of the Dossier​

I asked to specify:

What "false representation of the Dossier to the courts"? Please be specific.​

Why are you having a problem understanding and responding appropriately to a straight forward question?


At this point - dodge count = 1

Which is why I asked the question... to see if you would dodge the question -- so we are equal.

I will give you one more shot!

Got one quote:
While it’s too early to say for sure, it may also be an example of what I thought would never actually happen: the government pretextually using its national-security authority to continue a criminal investigation after determining it lacked evidence of crimes....

...To summarize, it appears there were no grounds for a criminal investigation of banking violations against Trump. Presumably based on the fact that the bank or banks at issue were Russian, the Justice Department and the FBI decided to continue investigating on national-security grounds. A FISA application in which Trump was “named” was rejected by the FISA court as overbroad, notwithstanding that the FISA court usually looks kindly on government surveillance requests. A second, more narrow application, apparently not naming Trump, may have been granted five months later; the best the media can say about it, however, is that the server on which the application centers is “possibly” related to the Trump campaign’s “alleged” links to two Russian banks — under circumstances in which the FBI has previously found no “nefarious purpose” in some (undescribed) connection between Trump Tower and at least one Russian bank (whose connection to Putin’s regime is not described)."

And so they spied on Trump... an abuse of power based on a fabricated dossier.

Should have been investigated to the fullest extent so we can know the WHOLE truth and not just the Republican side.

Obama & FISA: Trump Wiretap May Have Been Sought | National Review

There are multiple sites I could have quoted if you didn't like this one.

 

[Salvador]

Even more than Mueller?

As far as I know, Mueller has not reached any conflicting opinion nor different conclusion than that of AG William Barr in regards to there being zero evidence Trump colluded with Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election and there being zero evidence Trump obstructed Mueller's probe into this matter.

 

[fantome profane]

As far as I know, Mueller has not reached any conflicting opinion nor different conclusion than that of AG William Barr in regards to there being zero evidence Trump colluded with Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election and there being zero evidence Trump obstructed Mueller's probe into this matter.

If you read the report you would know.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Now there's no excuse to make claims about it saying things it doesn't say.

Get The Mueller Report Free on Audible

Yay the Socialist Democrats got their report.

I suppose there's no interest in you know, the dull-witted Socialists doin their jobs that they were originally elected for?

Let's see, lets take a look at the Socialist biased rag called CNN..

Investigations will continue despite submission of the Mueller report - CNNPolitics


Naw didn't think so.

Looks like some pathologically inclined socialists need to see a shrink or something.

You know, the definition of insanity?

No, forget it. Insanity never stops good socialists.

 

[Salvador]

If you read the report you would know.

How does the full non-redacted report actually differ from how the AG's report summary reads?

 

[fantome profane]

How does the full non-redacted report actually differ from how the AG's report summary reads?

For one, Mueller is very clear that the reason he did not reach a conclusion regarding obstruction is based on the policy that you can’t indict a sitting President. Mueller records all of the evidence for obstruction so that either Congress can decide, or for a future time when Trump is out of office. Mueller does not say there is no evidence of obstruction, he says the exact opposite.

 

[Salvador]

For one, Mueller is very clear that the reason he did not reach a conclusion regarding obstruction is based on the policy that you can’t indict a sitting President. Mueller records all of the evidence for obstruction so that either Congress can decide, or for a future time when Trump is out of office. Mueller does not say there is no evidence of obstruction, he says the exact opposite.

Could you please cite Mueller claiming there is evidence Trump obstructed the Mueller investigation?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Two years and thirty million dollars later there's zero evidence the Trump campaign colluded with Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election; there's also zero evidence Trump obstructed with the Mueller investigation. It's time now for our Congress to move along to resolving important legislative issues.

It's time for Congress to move on, for now, but Mueller's investigation did uncover evidence that lunched numerous other investigations.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

So you agree he is innocent until further notice as per the constitution?

I've not said otherwise.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

I expected this, whether the Mueller report vindicated or failed anti-Trumpers.
Investigations are useful to harass him & his minions, & can interfere with
any policies he's trying to advance. This is just as the impeachment of Bill
distracted him. I credit it for the defeat of Hillarycare.
So for as long as Trump is Prez, there will be investigations.

Probably, because Trump is constantly under investigation. He's also constantly being sued. For Trump, this really is business as normal.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Actually I don't, could you fill me in?

The person they chanted to lock up for at least a couple years.

 

[Revoltingest]

Probably, because Trump is constantly under investigation. He's also constantly being sued. For Trump, this really is business as normal.

As President, yes...but I doubt he endured such diverting legal woes in private life.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

The person they chanted to lock up for at least a couple years.

And still are. And yet "certain people" think they're fooling anyone by being willfully obtuse about it.

 

[ecco]

The report available to me is redacted for legitimate legal reasons; therefore, I'll trust the opinion of the AG who has read the non-redacted report and William Barr knows more than just about anybody else what the entire Mueller investigation has concluded.

Well, actually, Mueller and his staff know more about the report than Barr does.

 

[ecco]

It's time now for our Congress to move along to resolving important legislative issues.

NOW you want to move forward. When the Republicans had both Houses did they "move along to resolving important legislative issues" like immigration? No, they didn't. I wonder why?

 

[ecco]

What "false representation of the Dossier to the courts"? Please be specific.

Which is why I asked the question... to see if you would dodge the question -- so we are equal.

Not at all. You made an assertion. Post # 40...

In that he never pursued the false representation of the Dossier to the courts is evidence enough no matter what he wrote.

I asked you to back it up.

What "false representation of the Dossier to the courts"? Please be specific.

You couldn't provide anything to support your position. Instead, you tried to deflect by posting nonsense.


Now...

I will give you one more shot!

Got one quote:
While it’s too early to say for sure,...

...To summarize, it appears there were no grounds for a criminal investigation of banking violations against Trump.
Obama & FISA: Trump Wiretap May Have Been Sought | National Review

There are multiple sites I could have quoted if you didn't like this one.

I followed your link. I went to the article you posted. I searched for "dossier". The word "dossier" is not mentioned in the article.

So, again, when I asked...
What "false representation of the Dossier to the courts"? Please be specific.

You could not come up with anything.

What are you going to do now, post some more worthless links for me to chase?

 

[ecco]

How does the full non-redacted report actually differ from how the AG's report summary reads?

You know that none of us lowly citizens can ever see the "full non-redacted report". So your question is mere male bovine feces.

 

[ecco]

It's time for Congress to move on, for now, but Mueller's investigation did uncover evidence that lunched numerous other investigations.

As well as indictments and guilty pleas from close Trump insiders.