1. Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Food for Thought: Analytic vs Intuitive thinking and Religion

Discussion in 'Science and Religion' started by Copernicus, Apr 27, 2012.

  1. Copernicus

    Copernicus Godless Hierophant

    Messages:
    4,421
  2. Storm

    Storm ThrUU the Looking Glass

    Messages:
    44,609
    Religion:
    UU/ panentheist/ neopagan/ process theology
    I don't know. Either the experiment was... rather odd, or badly misrepresented by the article.

    "Researchers used problem-solving tasks and subtle experimental priming – including showing participants Rodin’s sculpture The Thinker or asking participants to complete questionnaires in hard-to-read fonts – to successfully produce “analytic” thinking. The researchers, who assessed participants’ belief levels using a variety of self-reported measures, found that religious belief decreased when participants engaged in analytic tasks, compared to participants who engaged in tasks that did not involve analytic thinking."

    I don't see what viewing art has to do with analytical thinking, to say nothing of giving people headaches with poorly designed letters.
     
  3. Quiddity

    Quiddity UndertheInfluenceofGiants

    Messages:
    19,503
    That actually makes sense.

    It's hard to attach meaning when you systematically break things down to the umpteenth degree.

    Analytical philosophy is great and useful. An analogy would be like describing a cup to the point that you break it down to quarks and atoms. At that point, you lose track of the big picture and argue about anti-matter and the space between atoms. It's just harder to attach meaning at that point.

    Now, if you are going to argue that religion and analytical philosophy don't mix, I will most assuredly disagree.
     
  4. bobhikes

    bobhikes Happyologist

    Messages:
    4,401
    That will be true for New thinkers, once the people understand analytic thinking completely they will either be thrown in to the middle or revert back.

    Analytical thinking is the New Star on the block, Once enough people join it will no longer be welcome and everyone will move on to the new thing. New things are more fun and Analytical thinking will prove itself tedious and boring.
     
  5. Quiddity

    Quiddity UndertheInfluenceofGiants

    Messages:
    19,503
    I don't think this will ever happen. People spend lifetimes trying to decifer Bertrand Russell and Wittgenstein works.

    In short, it just means the pulpit and priest have shifted from the religious front, the a more secular one.
     
  6. Copernicus

    Copernicus Godless Hierophant

    Messages:
    4,421
    The article left out a lot of details, so it is hard to assess the study on that basis. I'm going to assume that the results were statistically significant, so something was going on to affect the factor that the authors called "religious belief". To me, analytic thinking suggests weighing evidence for both sides of a proposition and coming to some judgment on the basis of evidence. When that happens, you temporarily suspend judgment in order to reassess. Becoming "less religious" is opening your mind to an atheistic point of view. Intuitive thinking, on the other hand, does not seem to involve suspension of judgment. You just make a decision on the basis of what "feels" right.

    So my question for the authors of the study would be whether they would expect strong atheists to become "more religious" under conditions that elicited analytic thinking. That is what I would expect. Anyway, it is food for thought. :)
     
  7. bobhikes

    bobhikes Happyologist

    Messages:
    4,401

    People spent the last 2000 years trying to decifer the bible.

    How old is judism
    How old is confucuisism

    Every Religion today is much older than Bertrand Russell and Wittgenstien and people are still trying to decifer these religions and these religions are shrinking. Just being analytical would prove the same for all future results.
     
  8. PolyHedral

    PolyHedral Superabacus Mystic

    Messages:
    6,333
    Oh, that's just more philosophy. The actual science takes only a couple of decades. ;)
     
  9. Quiddity

    Quiddity UndertheInfluenceofGiants

    Messages:
    19,503
    I'm guessing you are using the term in a much more broad way and not in it's more academic and professional use.
     
  10. Quiddity

    Quiddity UndertheInfluenceofGiants

    Messages:
    19,503
    :shrug:......what can I say? Science isn't really going to make an impact beyond what it's already made which is getting nominal and uneducated religious folks to leave for unphilosophical reasons.
     
Verification:
Draft saved Draft deleted