I understand.I don't think anyone should hide their religion. But some disagree.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I understand.I don't think anyone should hide their religion. But some disagree.
Its has absurd and false claims the Left is so hostile and intolerant of religion it wants it out of public and private lives.Nah. It's not the same. Obama could talk faith all he wanted because at the end of the day (and the start of it. And the middle) he held the views so dearly prized by the left. In our case, that BLM rocks and the police must be shutdown. Flynn disagrees, so when he talks about faith and God, he's a nut.
I think that view is based on weird things like:Its has absurd and false claims the Left is so hostile and intolerant of religion it wants it out of public and private lives.
Those arent attacks on religion. Lots of us can't go do things we want, and if America has taught is anything its that Americans believe the rules don't apply to them and cannot be trusted to do outdoor gatherings.I think that view is based on weird things like:
- Average people are discouraged from having large funerals for their loved ones whilst people like George Floyd and John Lewis have ginormous ones and no one says anything.
- Large protests are a-okay but churches and other houses of worship must remain closed. Not even drive-in services are allowed...
- Statues of religious figures are being torn down without much, if any, outcry.
There may be more, this is just off the top of my head.
Quite a few people on the right disagree with you on that.Those arent attacks on religion.
And holding views of the left, means you really don't believe in God? What about all those millions of believers who are politically left? You have to be right-wing politically in order to be a Christian?Nah. It's not the same. Obama could talk faith all he wanted because at the end of the day (and the start of it. And the middle) he held the views so dearly prized by the left.
What he is a nut about is this hysterical fear monger that anyone is trying to take God away from churches or your homes. That's tinfoil hat worthy nuttery.In our case, that BLM rocks and the police must be shutdown. Flynn disagrees, so when he talks about faith and God, he's a nut.
How did you infer that from what I wrote? Did I deny Obama's religiosity?And holding views of the left, means you don't believe in God? What about all those millions of believers who do?
No need to support what was never suggested.Care to support that somehow?
So why cancel drive-in services?What he is a nut about is this hysterical fear monger that anyone is trying to take God away from churches or your homes. That's tinfoil hat worthy nuttery.
You see canceling people mass gathering together in cars, which was decisions of local mayors as I recall, during a pandemic which threatens to kill people like a wildfire if not contained, to be a persecution against faith?So why cancel drive-in services?
Don't misunderstand me. I'm against the double standard. If it's rioting or protesting for BLM, all things go. If it's funerals for George Floyd or John Lewis, all things are peachy. But drive-in services will be the end of the world! Right.You see canceling people mass gathering together in cars, which was decisions of local mayors as I recall, during a pandemic which threatens to kill people like a wildfire if not contained, to be a persecution against faith?
That is laughable. What if there was actually raging fires in the area that threatened to burn down the church, and the sheriff ordered the church evacuated? Is he an agent of Satan in your mind? Does he hate God? Does he want to replace God in the churches with secular humanism? Maybe? You think that?
Is it? I guess there is nuttery about, but I'm not sure it's what you consider to be nuttery.So, as I said. Nuttery.
Is that you Hannity? Someone teaches you that gossip.BLM is doing the Conservative a favor by openly showing the left wing agenda that in the past was usually more hidden. The worse places in USA for blacks to live, are Democrat controlled cities like Chicago, NYC, Detroit, LA, etc. Yet BLM doss not point this out, since helping these blacks, at the source of the problem, is not their real agenda. Instead, they bust up and terrorize these places to keep these slaves from leaving the plantation. BLM is part of a modern multi-racial version of the KKK.
A survey was done of people who were asked whether they openly discuss their ideas and opinions in polls and in public. The answer was over 60% said no, out of fear of the anarchists and PC police. The fear mongering is working. However, what this means is a very large army of freedom fighters are waiting to pounce, when the time is right. Trump will be re-elected since he is for law and order. Law and order protects the innocent and fights the criminals, not the other way around.
This is at least the third time on this forum I've seen someone compare leftist people of color with slaves on a Southern plantation.BLM is doing the Conservative a favor by openly showing the left wing agenda that in the past was usually more hidden. The worse places in USA for blacks to live, are Democrat controlled cities like Chicago, NYC, Detroit, LA, etc. Yet BLM doss not point this out, since helping these blacks, at the source of the problem, is not their real agenda. Instead, they bust up and terrorize these places to keep these slaves from leaving the plantation. BLM is part of a modern multi-racial version of the KKK.
A lot of BLM activists are white, though.This is at least the third time on this forum I've seen someone compare leftist people of color with slaves on a Southern plantation.
What is it with these tasteless slavery metaphors?
They're mainly allies, not the focus of the movement. It's like straight and cis allies to the LGBT movement.A lot of BLM activists are white, though.
Yes, let's let's pretend there were no mentions of conspiracy theories regarding BLM or socialism, or that cops should allowed to abuse their power with impunity. Let's also pretend that religion disappears if governmemt isn't imposing it upon people.An op-ed of an op-ed that essentially claims that Flynn is crazy because he dared do the unthinkable, which is to write about the importance of having faith in God. Gasp, the horror! Yes, lock up all the religionists! Shut down RF!
This is something family actually put on their family facebook page. This is not just an article I have found on the internet or daily onion or the china daily. What the man is saying appeals to people who already agree with him. Thus it has potency, even if we have never heard of the medium carrying it.WND as a source for anything? Not in my book.
You have some points there about speaking openly about faith. I am actually more curious about his accusations of the BLM movement. I am a little disappointed that most replies were just "Well its because he's crazy." I thought the comment "He's a crook" was more relevant.Nah. It's not the same. Obama could talk faith all he wanted because at the end of the day (and the start of it. And the middle) he held the views so dearly prized by the left. In our case, that BLM rocks and the police must be shutdown. Flynn disagrees, so when he talks about faith and God, he's a nut.
On facebook a relative posted a link to this article by someone calling themselves Gen. Michael Flynn.
Gen. Michael Flynn: If we don't act, 2% of the people are about to control the other 98%
He claims that there is an organized effort to drive God and prayer out of our churches, associates this with the Black Lives Matter movement and says the police are our defense against totalitarianism. He finishes his article by saying we must challenge every politician and always support our police. Some alarming quotes follow from the linked article:
"There is now a small group of passionate people working hard to destroy our American way of life. Treason and treachery are rampant and our rule of law and those law enforcement professionals who uphold our laws are under the gun more than at any time in our nation’s history."
"If the United States wants to survive the onslaught of socialism, if we are to continue to enjoy self-government and the liberty of our hard-fought freedoms we have to understand there are two opposing forces: One is the 'children of light' and the other is the 'children of darkness.' "
"They are also intent on driving God out of our families, our schools and our courts. They are even seeking the very removal of God from our churches, essentially hoping to remove God from our everyday lives."
These are just three of the many claims made against BLM in this article. Is this what BLM means when it says "We are trained Marxists?" What, exactly, are the aims of BLM? Does it, in fact, believe in marxism? Does it aim to drive God out of our families, schools and our courts? If so, why? If not then why does a US General believe this?
Maybe as he claims BLM is merely a marxist bloody uprising falsely claiming to be a movement for the benefit of black Americans. That appears to be the gist of this article. If you know something this is a chance to comment and to reply to the charges.
Many of them also believe wearing a mask is a fundamental assault on their rights and oppression comparable to that suffering by the Jews under Nazi Germany.Quite a few people on the right disagree with you on that.