#### questfortruth

##### Well-Known Member

The arXiv.org looks like a cemetery of the unchecked solutions to known conjectures, however the Positive Methodology, if widely accepted, can get them journal publication.

Today's science, if the author is not a recognized top scientist, demands that the manuscript be absolutely obvious as 2 + 2 = 4.

However, science is not always as apparent as 2 + 2 = 4. The top scripts of scientists use much more hope for the correctness of calculations than just using 2 + 2 = 4. Yes, the calculations are determitive, but much more complicated than simply writing school math. Thus, any top scientist as an author very much hopes, that if somebody will find a mistake, then it will happen not right away after the publication. Thus, the scripts, which are using University math, are always vulnerable. However, they must be rejected not but groundless pessimistic feeling "our journal does not want the paper'', but by discovering logically the errors in author's logic.

Today's science, if the author is not a recognized top scientist, demands that the manuscript be absolutely obvious as 2 + 2 = 4.

However, science is not always as apparent as 2 + 2 = 4. The top scripts of scientists use much more hope for the correctness of calculations than just using 2 + 2 = 4. Yes, the calculations are determitive, but much more complicated than simply writing school math. Thus, any top scientist as an author very much hopes, that if somebody will find a mistake, then it will happen not right away after the publication. Thus, the scripts, which are using University math, are always vulnerable. However, they must be rejected not but groundless pessimistic feeling "our journal does not want the paper'', but by discovering logically the errors in author's logic.

Last edited: