Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
NSA?
Try Facebook and Twitter and Tik Tok and Linkedin and SnapChat and Instagram and WeChat and Tumblr and Messenger and QQ and Qzone and Reddit and .....
Phew, that's better!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
NSA?
Try Facebook and Twitter and Tik Tok and Linkedin and SnapChat and Instagram and WeChat and Tumblr and Messenger and QQ and Qzone and Reddit and .....
That is default narc behavior, I would not have expected anything else from TrumpIt only happened because of Trump's bull****
Maybe on January 20thAre we still on about the election stuff? The horse is already dead... When's enough gonna be enough?
Great summary but you whiffed on that last part, Lyndon, I’m afraid.This is all total BS from our primary BS source, once the ballot signature is verified the envelope with the persons name is separated from the ballot and there is no way to re verify the signature as the ballot has no information on it to show who the voter is and after the first stage it is totally and finally separated so no one can possibly know who the person voted for, as as any idiot can see there is no way to check the signature a second time.
Have you noticed how few lawsuits and investigations there have been to uncover the fraud that illegitimately increased the Trump vote? It seems like no one is looking at that. We’ve barely scratched the surface.That would be like looking on top of a rug and saying the rug is clean. It is honest statement that they looked on the top of a rug, but the real honesty is when you lift the rug up and check underneath.
Actually, no.Have you noticed how few lawsuits and investigations there have been to uncover the fraud that illegitimately increased the Trump vote? It seems like no one is looking at that. We’ve barely scratched the surface.
See? The Fraud of the Gaps argument cuts both ways ... the less evidence, the more my suspicions are confirmed that Biden really won in a landslide.
Can I ask a question? Yes, many of the lawsuits have failed on the basis of standing (as they should) and some have failed based on merit (as they should).Actually, no.
I see where most lawsuits are denied on the bases of standing without reviewing its merits. And a 60+ error rate by machines which opens the door to fraud.
Those that are still under litigation. Additionally, the statement of dueling electors in States in which they are saying there is enough fraud that should be addressed.Can I ask a question? Yes, many of the lawsuits have failed on the basis of standing (as they should) and some have failed based on merit (as they should).
My question is how many lawsuits have succeeded based on the merits?
At this time, how many of these lawsuits have succeeded on the basis of the merits?Those that are still under litigation. Additionally, the statement of dueling electors in States in which they are saying there is enough fraud that should be addressed.
Actually, no and yes.
This one is a more substantive and complete review. That's why it is being done again.
So, here you go again, posting nonsense.And a 60+ error rate by machines which opens the door to fraud.
Those that are still under litigation.
Confirming you are looking for ratification, not truth.I see where most lawsuits are denied on the bases of standing without reviewing its merits.
This site lists them but was last updated Dec 11 2020Oh, there are still some cases under litigation? Care to list them so we can see what you are going on about.
I see where most lawsuits are denied on the bases of standing without reviewing its merits.
If the door was open to fraud, Trump would be the first to walk through it. I say Biden won by a much larger margin until we prove once and for all that all these votes were legitimate.Actually, no.
I see where most lawsuits are denied on the bases of standing without reviewing its merits. And a 60+ error rate by machines which opens the door to fraud.
I say Biden won by a much larger margin until we prove once and for all that all these votes were legitimate.
This is not totally true, and I forget this point myself at times. I know that there are two states where there remains a tie between envelopes and ballots. North Carolina is one of them. I cannot remember which other state does this. It turns out that there is not a Constitutional guarantee to an anonymous ballot. I am still looking for confirming sources, but I have found them before.This is all total BS from our primary BS source, once the ballot signature is verified the envelope with the persons name is separated from the ballot and there is no way to re verify the signature as the ballot has no information on it to show who the voter is and after the first stage it is totally and finally separated so no one can possibly know who the person voted for, as as any idiot can see there is no way to check the signature a second time.
There were no "dueling electors." Biden won that election as well. Biden will be sworn as president in a month, and Trump will have to find a new home.Those that are still under litigation. Additionally, the statement of dueling electors in States in which they are saying there is enough fraud that should be addressed.